Court TV may have lost a misandrist when Nancy Grace left. However they have a new one and that is Star Jones. Jones is a former prosecutor and current misandrist. She jumped on the case of an NFL star whom had a lot of children with different women, 9 to be exact but she said she would ask 3 of those women why they did sleep with him. Yes,they slept with him voluntary so I'm guessing he didn't rape them but Jones practically compares the two nor is there any mention of the quality of the relationship between the NFL star and his children but it must be good otherwise Jones would have said something about it. She also comes down hard on prostitution-hard on both prostitutes and their customers,making women out to be victims and men out to be predators. She talks to two authoresses about young girls getting sexual in their teens and conviently forgot the whores that the media glamorizes and when girls do this boys pay,but I'll guess Jones and the whore authoresses don't understand this and/or they don't give a shit. They did say that a rendezvous between a teen girl and teen boy ended up with the boy going to jail and this was in a New England state but I don't know which one because it wasn't mentioned so obviously boys and men don't count with these cunts. She also talked about seriel killers and their survivors and guess what? They were all MALE seriel killers. No mention of Aieleen Wuarous or Karla Faye Tucker or their ilks. Nope,just men were profiled,she even meniton Ted Bundy and I believe none of his victims survived. But he is a man and only good for dumping on as that is apparently Jones' attitude. Finally she concludes her show with girl power cowshit on how women should go to college and not be beautiful and not be nice to men. Yada yada yada. Roll credits.
These are usually the same cunts that have a problem getting a guy (sarcasm) gee,I wonder why(/sarcasm) and usually call these men "wimps" and other names because men won't date these castratrixes. I wouldn't put these men down as they seem to demonstrate high intelligence.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Someone in the MSM sees the misandry in society
This article confirms what a misandric prick John Walsh is,check it out:
MOVING ON
By JEFF ZASLOW
Are We Teaching Our Kids
To Be Fearful of Men?
August 23, 2007; Page D1
When children get lost in a mall, they're supposed to find a "low-risk adult" to help them. Guidelines issued by police departments and child-safety groups often encourage them to look for "a pregnant woman," "a mother pushing a stroller" or "a grandmother."
The implied message: Men, even dads pushing strollers, are "high-risk."
Are we teaching children that men are out to hurt them? The answer, on many fronts, is yes. Child advocate John Walsh advises parents to never hire a male babysitter. Airlines are placing unaccompanied minors with female passengers rather than male passengers. Soccer leagues are telling male coaches not to touch players.
A Virginia public-service ad that angered fathers'-rights groups.
Child-welfare groups say these are necessary precautions, given that most predators are male. But fathers' rights activists and educators now argue that an inflated predator panic is damaging men's relationships with kids. Some men are opting not to get involved with children at all, which partly explains why many youth groups can't find male leaders, and why just 9% of elementary-school teachers are male, down from 18% in 1981.
People assume that all men "have the potential for violence and sexual aggressiveness," says Peter Stearns, a George Mason University professor who studies fear and anxiety. Kids end up viewing every male stranger "as a potential evildoer," he says, and as a byproduct, "there's an overconfidence in female virtues."
In Michigan, the North Macomb Soccer Club has a policy that at least one female parent must always sit on the sidelines, to guard against any untoward behavior by male coaches. In Churchville, Pa., soccer coach Barry Pflueger says young girls often want a hug after scoring a goal, but he refrains. Even when girls are injured, "you must comfort them without touching them, a very difficult thing to do," he says. "It saddens me that this is what we've come to."
TV shows, including the Dateline NBC series "To Catch a Predator," hype stories about male abusers. Now social-service agencies are also using controversial tactics to spread the word about abuse. This summer, Virginia's Department of Health mounted an ad campaign for its sex-abuse hotline. Billboards featured photos of a man holding a child's hand. The caption: "It doesn't feel right when I see them together."
More than 200 men emailed complaints about the campaign to the health department. "The implication is that if you see a man holding a girl's hand, he's probably a predator," says Marc Rudov, who runs the fathers' rights site TheNoNonsenseMan.com. "In other words, if you see a father out with his daughter, call the police."
Virginia's campaign was designed to encourage people to trust their instincts about possible abuse, says Rebecca Odor, director of sexual and domestic violence prevention for the state health department. She stands by the ads, pointing out that 89% of child sex-abuse perpetrators in Virginia are male.
Mr. Walsh, host of Fox's "America's Most Wanted," began advocating for missing children in 1981, after his son was killed by a stranger. He knows some men are offended by his advice to never hire a male babysitter. But as he sees it, if a teenage boy wants to experiment with sex, you don't want him using your kids.
"It's not a witch hunt," he says. "It's all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle. Who's more likely to molest a child? A male."
Airlines use similar reasoning when they seat unaccompanied minors only with women. They are trying to decrease the odds of a problem. Certainly, many men would be safe seatmates for kids, but sometimes, especially on overnight flights in darkened cabins, "you have to make generalizations for the safety of a child," says Diana Fairechild, an expert witness in aviation disputes. Airlines have had decades of experience monitoring the gender of abusive seatmates, she adds, quoting a line repeated in airline circles: "No regulation in aviation takes effect without somebody's blood on it."
Most men understand the need to be cautious, so they're willing to take a step back from children, or to change seats on a plane. One abused child is one too many. Still, it's important to maintain perspective. "The number of men who will hurt a child is tiny compared to the population," says Benjamin Radford, who researches statistics on predators and is managing editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer. "Virtually all of the time, if a child is lost or in trouble, he will be safe going to the nearest male stranger."
Email: Jeffrey.Zaslow@wsj.com.
Source: here
MOVING ON
By JEFF ZASLOW
Are We Teaching Our Kids
To Be Fearful of Men?
August 23, 2007; Page D1
When children get lost in a mall, they're supposed to find a "low-risk adult" to help them. Guidelines issued by police departments and child-safety groups often encourage them to look for "a pregnant woman," "a mother pushing a stroller" or "a grandmother."
The implied message: Men, even dads pushing strollers, are "high-risk."
Are we teaching children that men are out to hurt them? The answer, on many fronts, is yes. Child advocate John Walsh advises parents to never hire a male babysitter. Airlines are placing unaccompanied minors with female passengers rather than male passengers. Soccer leagues are telling male coaches not to touch players.
A Virginia public-service ad that angered fathers'-rights groups.
Child-welfare groups say these are necessary precautions, given that most predators are male. But fathers' rights activists and educators now argue that an inflated predator panic is damaging men's relationships with kids. Some men are opting not to get involved with children at all, which partly explains why many youth groups can't find male leaders, and why just 9% of elementary-school teachers are male, down from 18% in 1981.
People assume that all men "have the potential for violence and sexual aggressiveness," says Peter Stearns, a George Mason University professor who studies fear and anxiety. Kids end up viewing every male stranger "as a potential evildoer," he says, and as a byproduct, "there's an overconfidence in female virtues."
In Michigan, the North Macomb Soccer Club has a policy that at least one female parent must always sit on the sidelines, to guard against any untoward behavior by male coaches. In Churchville, Pa., soccer coach Barry Pflueger says young girls often want a hug after scoring a goal, but he refrains. Even when girls are injured, "you must comfort them without touching them, a very difficult thing to do," he says. "It saddens me that this is what we've come to."
TV shows, including the Dateline NBC series "To Catch a Predator," hype stories about male abusers. Now social-service agencies are also using controversial tactics to spread the word about abuse. This summer, Virginia's Department of Health mounted an ad campaign for its sex-abuse hotline. Billboards featured photos of a man holding a child's hand. The caption: "It doesn't feel right when I see them together."
More than 200 men emailed complaints about the campaign to the health department. "The implication is that if you see a man holding a girl's hand, he's probably a predator," says Marc Rudov, who runs the fathers' rights site TheNoNonsenseMan.com. "In other words, if you see a father out with his daughter, call the police."
Virginia's campaign was designed to encourage people to trust their instincts about possible abuse, says Rebecca Odor, director of sexual and domestic violence prevention for the state health department. She stands by the ads, pointing out that 89% of child sex-abuse perpetrators in Virginia are male.
Mr. Walsh, host of Fox's "America's Most Wanted," began advocating for missing children in 1981, after his son was killed by a stranger. He knows some men are offended by his advice to never hire a male babysitter. But as he sees it, if a teenage boy wants to experiment with sex, you don't want him using your kids.
"It's not a witch hunt," he says. "It's all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle. Who's more likely to molest a child? A male."
Airlines use similar reasoning when they seat unaccompanied minors only with women. They are trying to decrease the odds of a problem. Certainly, many men would be safe seatmates for kids, but sometimes, especially on overnight flights in darkened cabins, "you have to make generalizations for the safety of a child," says Diana Fairechild, an expert witness in aviation disputes. Airlines have had decades of experience monitoring the gender of abusive seatmates, she adds, quoting a line repeated in airline circles: "No regulation in aviation takes effect without somebody's blood on it."
Most men understand the need to be cautious, so they're willing to take a step back from children, or to change seats on a plane. One abused child is one too many. Still, it's important to maintain perspective. "The number of men who will hurt a child is tiny compared to the population," says Benjamin Radford, who researches statistics on predators and is managing editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer. "Virtually all of the time, if a child is lost or in trouble, he will be safe going to the nearest male stranger."
Email: Jeffrey.Zaslow@wsj.com.
Source: here
Saturday, August 18, 2007
Sick cunt
I want to give a shout out to Unit01 for posting this on Chris Key's Forum. I found this shit so disturbing that I had to post it here hoping it gets the attention of a CPS official.
Check it out:
This disgusted me, and I thought I would share. This was posted by a woman who calles herself "Bitingbeaver", and though now her blogspot is private, I thought I would share her article so that we can all see what radical feminism can be like.
I would love to call CPS and see if her son is in any true danger.
Several years ago my accountability program found that the computer had been accessing pornography. Turns out it was my middle son. To date he has been 'caught' accessing pornography many times since then. He was 13 I think when this started.
I banned him from the computer, but after a few months I would allow him to be on it for short periods of time. Each and every single time my son would access pornography within days (and sometimes hours) of being allowed back online. He was aware that he would be caught because the computers are monitored but he chose to do it anyway.
Most recently my youngest son allowed my middle son to play with his PSP. Brandon (the middle child) used it to immediately access pornography online. The child is now banned from computers, video games and so forth. I've talked until I'm blue in the face, I've grown angry and yelled, I've cried when I was alone and when I was in front of him. I've had him read Dworkin, my site, and other places (namely OAG's site) and I still can't unseat this problem. He can recite feminist literature all day long, he can understand the tenets, the ideas behind it, how it links together but he will not allow this knowledge to stand in the way of his porn use.
I don't think I'm looking for advice (I've tried everything I could think of so far) but more a place to simply be sad. I can clearly see why he's looking at pornography, I've figured all that out readily enough, but I can't seem to make it stop.
I know, that as soon as my child leaves my home and moves into his own place that he will be looking at porn immediately. I know that I am raising a problem for women. I know that this child will one day grow and will fully absorb the messages that porn sends to men. I know that my child masturbates to degradation of my people (when I use that phrase I mean womyn) and that with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
I know that there will likely come a day where my son coerces a young woman into sex (rape) and there isn't a damned thing I can do about it. I look into the eyes of my son and they still sparkle like they did when he was a baby, but he's not a baby anymore, he's growing into a man and that man will have trained himself to degrade women before he leaves my home.
As a radical feminist who puts women first I cannot begin to determine what I should do with regards to this issue. My heart breaks because there is nothing I can do to protect the womyn he will come into contact with.
I have three boys. One of them is lost to me and as a mother and a radical womyn this breaks my heart in a way I can scarcely express. I don't know if it says something terrible about me, but you know what haunts me late at night? More than anything else? I know, in my heart of hearts that, knowing what I know now, if I had it to do over again I would have had that abortion.
I also find myself blaming myself over and over again, even though that radical womyn inside of me stands up and yells that I'm placing blame in the wrong place. I'm not sure what I intended to say with this message. I began writing it this morning and put it away again and finally decided to finish it this evening. I think that maybe I just wanted to share, I keep trying with Brandon and I keep failing. He simply doesn't care. When he wants to jerk off, everything goes right out the window.
It chills me, as a father myself to think that a young mans mother is responding this way to what are perfectly natural urges in a teenage boy.
She can be reached as well for comment at bitingbeaver@yahoo.com, I have already given her a bit of my mind. I am sorry if I come across as so angry for a firstpost, but this very much worries me. She is also the author of "When is it Rape?" I am sure some of you have read.
Check it out:
This disgusted me, and I thought I would share. This was posted by a woman who calles herself "Bitingbeaver", and though now her blogspot is private, I thought I would share her article so that we can all see what radical feminism can be like.
I would love to call CPS and see if her son is in any true danger.
Several years ago my accountability program found that the computer had been accessing pornography. Turns out it was my middle son. To date he has been 'caught' accessing pornography many times since then. He was 13 I think when this started.
I banned him from the computer, but after a few months I would allow him to be on it for short periods of time. Each and every single time my son would access pornography within days (and sometimes hours) of being allowed back online. He was aware that he would be caught because the computers are monitored but he chose to do it anyway.
Most recently my youngest son allowed my middle son to play with his PSP. Brandon (the middle child) used it to immediately access pornography online. The child is now banned from computers, video games and so forth. I've talked until I'm blue in the face, I've grown angry and yelled, I've cried when I was alone and when I was in front of him. I've had him read Dworkin, my site, and other places (namely OAG's site) and I still can't unseat this problem. He can recite feminist literature all day long, he can understand the tenets, the ideas behind it, how it links together but he will not allow this knowledge to stand in the way of his porn use.
I don't think I'm looking for advice (I've tried everything I could think of so far) but more a place to simply be sad. I can clearly see why he's looking at pornography, I've figured all that out readily enough, but I can't seem to make it stop.
I know, that as soon as my child leaves my home and moves into his own place that he will be looking at porn immediately. I know that I am raising a problem for women. I know that this child will one day grow and will fully absorb the messages that porn sends to men. I know that my child masturbates to degradation of my people (when I use that phrase I mean womyn) and that with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
I know that there will likely come a day where my son coerces a young woman into sex (rape) and there isn't a damned thing I can do about it. I look into the eyes of my son and they still sparkle like they did when he was a baby, but he's not a baby anymore, he's growing into a man and that man will have trained himself to degrade women before he leaves my home.
As a radical feminist who puts women first I cannot begin to determine what I should do with regards to this issue. My heart breaks because there is nothing I can do to protect the womyn he will come into contact with.
I have three boys. One of them is lost to me and as a mother and a radical womyn this breaks my heart in a way I can scarcely express. I don't know if it says something terrible about me, but you know what haunts me late at night? More than anything else? I know, in my heart of hearts that, knowing what I know now, if I had it to do over again I would have had that abortion.
I also find myself blaming myself over and over again, even though that radical womyn inside of me stands up and yells that I'm placing blame in the wrong place. I'm not sure what I intended to say with this message. I began writing it this morning and put it away again and finally decided to finish it this evening. I think that maybe I just wanted to share, I keep trying with Brandon and I keep failing. He simply doesn't care. When he wants to jerk off, everything goes right out the window.
It chills me, as a father myself to think that a young mans mother is responding this way to what are perfectly natural urges in a teenage boy.
She can be reached as well for comment at bitingbeaver@yahoo.com, I have already given her a bit of my mind. I am sorry if I come across as so angry for a firstpost, but this very much worries me. She is also the author of "When is it Rape?" I am sure some of you have read.
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Heading off the femicunts
I received a publication from a friend by snail mail and the section enclosed by the red caught my attention. The publication is Reader Magazine and on page 14 they are trying to get people to contact California senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer (who are both worthless feminazis) to pass The Convention on the Elimination Of All Forms Of Discrimation against Women (CEDAW) and they are packaging it as though women were really suffering,which they are not. I contacted them and told them that women are definitely NOT suffering,in fact it was men who are suffering at the hands of this matriarchy more than women ever will.
The more of us they hear from the louder our voices will be heard.
To contact them:
phone: Tel: 909-335-8100
Fax: 909-335-6777
snail mail: The Reader Magazine
10 East Vine Street, Suite 210
Redlands, California 92373
(update: I hope that email address works now. If your email came back undelieverable welcome to the club. Hopefully the correction should do it.
6-28-07-My eletter just got spitted back at me so the "info" part of the address isn't any good which is odd considering this is the only email address they gave. Oh well,let's try "letters".)
The following is the eletter I wrote to them:
This is in response to your advertisement that The Convention on the Elimation of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) is justified when it is not. Women in the U.S. do not suffer discrimination nor do they face discrimination in the western world. Women attend univerisities more than men do,women have special programs that are denied men and women can get out of crimes that men cannot. To pass this legislation in the U.S. is akin to giving money to rich people as though they were poor. In fact it is MEN who face more discrimination more than women do.
Here are some examples:
All of below from the book 'The Myth Of Male Power' by Dr. Warren Farrell:
1. Selective Service-chapter 1,pg.28-'a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do':
"In post offices throughout the United States,Selective Service posters remind men that only they must register for the draft. If the post office had a poster saying "A Jew's gotta do what a Jew's gotta do' or if 'a woman's gotta a do...' were written across the body of a pregnant woman... The question is this: How is it if any other group were singled out to register for the draft based merely on its characteristics at birth-be that group blacks,Jews,women or gays-we would immediately recognize it as genocide,but when men are singled out based on on their sex at birth,men (and women from what I,MM,have seen) call it power".
Same chapter,pg.30: 'Our slogan for women is "A Woman's body. A Woman's Choice";our slogan for men is "A Man's Gotta Do What A Man Has To Do".
2. Rape-"The Politics of Rape"-chapter 14,pg.322
"To my considerable chagrin,we found that at least 60 percent of all rape allegations were false"-Dr. Charles P. McDowell,Supervisory Special Agent,U.S. Air Force,Office of Special Investigations.
These are cases where women deliberitly LIED. Why did they lie?
These are the reasons and percentages: Same chapter,pg.325
"Spite or revenge-20%,to compensate for feelings of guilt or shame-20%,thought she might be pregnant-13%,to conceal an affair-12%,to test husband's love-9%,mental/emotional disorder-9%,to avoid personal responsibility-4%,failure to pay or extortion-4%,thought she might have caught VD-3%,other-6%.Total-100%".
3. Women-only defenses-"Women who kill too much and the courts that free them:the twelve female only defenses"-chapter 12,pgs.254-282 (to keep this short we will only cover three)
1.The "innocent woman" defense "I am starting with the 'innocent woman defense' because it underlies all twelve defenses. At first I called this the 'Female Credibility Principle' because of the tendency to see women as more credible than men because of being thought more innocent. However,even when women admitted making false allegations that they were raped or that their husbands abused them,for example,their admission that they lied was often not believed. Therefore the belief in the innocent woman ran even deeper than the tendency to believe women."
Farrell gives an example such as:
*Bessie Reese was angry that he husband was leaving her so she poisoned the lunches of her husband's travelling companion's children and those children died. Her husband's friend,James Richardson,was falsely convicted of killing his own children and sent to prison even though he had an alibi and he sat on death row for 21 years before being exonerated for the crimes. Reese had confessed to the crimes while he sat in prison but nobody believed her and she was no innocent little girl. She was set free after being found guilty of poisoning her first husband and guilty of shooting her second,only this time she did a short stint in jail. The only way Richardson was freed was on racial grounds (Reese is white and Richardson is black). Why was she never considered a suspect? Because the local sheriff was having an affair with her and covered up for her.
2.The PMS defence ("My body,no choice")
"In,1970,when Dr. Edgar Berman said women's hormones during menstruation and menopause could have a detrimental influence on women's decision making,feminists were outraged. He was soon served up as the quintessential example of medical male chauvinism. But by the 1980's,some feminists were saying that PMS was the reason a woman who deliberately killed a man should go free. In England,the PMS defense freed Chrisitine English after she confessed to killing her boyfriend by deliberately ramming him into a utilty pole with her car; and,after killing a co-worker,Sandie Smith was put on probation-with one condition: she must report monthly for injections of progesterone to control symptoms of PMS. By the 1990's,the PMS defense paved the way for other hormonal defenses. Sheryl Lynn Massip could place her 6-month old son under a car,run over him repeatedly,and the,uncertain he was was dead,do it again,then claim postpartum depression and be given outpatient medical help. No feminist protested."
3.The husband defense "The film 'I love you to death' was based on a true story of a woman who tried to kill her husband when she discovered he had been unfaithful. She and her mom tried to poison him,then hired muggers to beat him and shoot him through the head. A fluke led to their being caught and sent to jail.Miraculously,the husband survived." The husband forgave her and her actions. In fact,a lot of husbands forgive their wives even when that husband has done nothing wrong.
These are just a few examples of female privilege and male disadvantage. Now some can say that women are disadvantage in the non-western world but these are the same people that ignore male suffering in those same regions. For instance men and only men are required to serve in these countries' military and some of these men may not want to do that but they have no voice and no international agencies speaking out on their behalf and if these men protest they take the chance of alienating their government which may persecute them for speaking out and it is these men that must fight a war if their government demands it whereas women are exempt from this just as they are in the western world so passing CEDAW makes very little sense.
Meet H. Rudy Ericson
Rudy is an anti-MRA mangina who claims his zodiac sign is the horse which fits considering he is an horse's ass.
But what does Rudy do when he is not spewing shit on his blog or annoying people in general? Why he likes to read his favorite magazine of course.
Of course Rudy bills himself as a political kind of "guy?" In fact let's see one of his fellow supporters.
I make everything sound so clear cut with Rudy but that is not the case because Rudy is politically confused. Yes,Rudy is torn between two candidates for president and Rudy has to choose one.
Or
Never let it be said that Rudy isn't a patriotic American. Oh no,in fact he is very patriotic as he gives the president the thumbs up.
Just like Rudy.
Serpents from hell
My friend Chris Key has put together a couple of videos highlighting the evils of feminism. Learn and enjoy.
This explains the mentality of women
21 June 2007
BRIDE IS BANNED FROM HER OWN PRISON WEDDING
EXCLUSIVE Jail act after drug trace find
By Karen Bale
A WOMAN who planned to marry her brother's murderer in jail has been forced to cancel the wedding after being banned from the prison.
Lesley Cameron got engaged to Mark Ronald as he awaited sentence for butchering her brother Scott in a frenzied attack.
She planned to wed the killer in Shotts maximum security prison this summer.
But prison bosses discovered traces of illegal substances on her - and banned her from the Lanarkshire jail.
Police dogs found traces of illegal drugs on mum-of-one Lesley, 28, during a routine search at the prison gates.
A source said last night: "Lesley is furious she has been banned.
"They were planning a low-key but romantic wedding ceremony within the prison this summer.
"Lesley had everything planned out and was excited about choosing a dress and flowers.
"Then, during a routine search as she went up to see Mark, the prison dogs found traces of drugs on her.
"She was thrown out of the prison immediately and banned from visiting Mark indefinitely.
"Lesley is distraught as it means the wedding is off for the time being. She is hoping to rearrange it if she is ever allowed back in to see her fiance.
"She doesn't want to wait until he's released from jail, as it could be a long time."
But the source added: "Lesley's family are delighted. They never forgave her for standing by the man who killed her brother. She has been completely disowned."
Ronald, 32, killed his long-time friend Scott, 31, in a frenzied attack in Beith, Ayrshire, in September 2005.
They argued while watching a Scotland game on TV.
The fight spilled out on to the street and Ronald stabbed Scott several times, with the fatal blow going through his ear..
Scott's partner and his son Kyle, eight, witnessed the attack.
Lesley, who had been seeing Ronald for a year, kept a vigil by her brother's hospital bedside but he died four days later.
Ronald already had convictions for possessing knives and for assault when he murdered Scott.
He claimed he stabbed Scott in self-defence while trying to protect Lesley, who was pregnant.
But the jury took just 20 minutes to convict him.
Last year, Lesley told the Record: "I don't feel threatened by Mark. He isn't violent normally. He was provoked really badly and lost the plot."
She refused to comment yesterday.
Source: here
I've got to comment on this and here it is:
A WOMAN who planned to marry her brother's murderer in jail has been forced to cancel the wedding after being banned from the prison.
This alone just floored me as it truly illustrates the female mentality and what is important to them and apparently men,even men related to them by blood,do not matter. Then some assholes,some even call themselves "MRA's",wonder why I have an attitude with women and it is usually the asshats who are not in it for the civil rights restoration that I'm in it for but are hoping to find a girlfriend,I guess through pity sex and those are the asshats I hate. My message to the asshats: Hey,I'm not in your singles bars so stay out of my movement. But anyway back to the article.
But prison bosses discovered traces of illegal substances on her - and banned her from the Lanarkshire jail.
What fucking irony. Don't expect me to feel sorry for her.
"Lesley had everything planned out and was excited about choosing a dress and flowers.
Yes,this is what matters to them;flowers and dresses. Certainly not the death of a relative and worse yet,marriage to that relative's killer.
"Lesley is distraught as it means the wedding is off for the time being. She is hoping to rearrange it if she is ever allowed back in to see her fiance.
Yep,the whole universe revolves around her. It's just her her her.
"She doesn't want to wait until he's released from jail, as it could be a long time."
This is probably due to the fact he will lose some points with her because he not as much of a "bad boy" as someone who is locked up also once freed he will have other women to look at and she will lose her "queen bee" status.
But the source added: "Lesley's family are delighted. They never forgave her for standing by the man who killed her brother. She has been completely disowned."
(sarcasm)Gee,I fucking wonder why.(/sarcasm) At least there are some people in this article I can respect.
Lesley, who had been seeing Ronald for a year, kept a vigil by her brother's hospital bedside but he died four days later.
Keeping vigil like a vulture. She probably wanted to make sure he was dead.
He claimed he stabbed Scott in self-defence while trying to protect Lesley, who was pregnant.
The old chivilary routine. It's like I said,chivilary is the hiding place of cowards and scoundrels.
But the jury took just 20 minutes to convict him.
The jury didn't buy it. That's a second group of people mentioned in this article that I can respect.
BRIDE IS BANNED FROM HER OWN PRISON WEDDING
EXCLUSIVE Jail act after drug trace find
By Karen Bale
A WOMAN who planned to marry her brother's murderer in jail has been forced to cancel the wedding after being banned from the prison.
Lesley Cameron got engaged to Mark Ronald as he awaited sentence for butchering her brother Scott in a frenzied attack.
She planned to wed the killer in Shotts maximum security prison this summer.
But prison bosses discovered traces of illegal substances on her - and banned her from the Lanarkshire jail.
Police dogs found traces of illegal drugs on mum-of-one Lesley, 28, during a routine search at the prison gates.
A source said last night: "Lesley is furious she has been banned.
"They were planning a low-key but romantic wedding ceremony within the prison this summer.
"Lesley had everything planned out and was excited about choosing a dress and flowers.
"Then, during a routine search as she went up to see Mark, the prison dogs found traces of drugs on her.
"She was thrown out of the prison immediately and banned from visiting Mark indefinitely.
"Lesley is distraught as it means the wedding is off for the time being. She is hoping to rearrange it if she is ever allowed back in to see her fiance.
"She doesn't want to wait until he's released from jail, as it could be a long time."
But the source added: "Lesley's family are delighted. They never forgave her for standing by the man who killed her brother. She has been completely disowned."
Ronald, 32, killed his long-time friend Scott, 31, in a frenzied attack in Beith, Ayrshire, in September 2005.
They argued while watching a Scotland game on TV.
The fight spilled out on to the street and Ronald stabbed Scott several times, with the fatal blow going through his ear..
Scott's partner and his son Kyle, eight, witnessed the attack.
Lesley, who had been seeing Ronald for a year, kept a vigil by her brother's hospital bedside but he died four days later.
Ronald already had convictions for possessing knives and for assault when he murdered Scott.
He claimed he stabbed Scott in self-defence while trying to protect Lesley, who was pregnant.
But the jury took just 20 minutes to convict him.
Last year, Lesley told the Record: "I don't feel threatened by Mark. He isn't violent normally. He was provoked really badly and lost the plot."
She refused to comment yesterday.
Source: here
I've got to comment on this and here it is:
A WOMAN who planned to marry her brother's murderer in jail has been forced to cancel the wedding after being banned from the prison.
This alone just floored me as it truly illustrates the female mentality and what is important to them and apparently men,even men related to them by blood,do not matter. Then some assholes,some even call themselves "MRA's",wonder why I have an attitude with women and it is usually the asshats who are not in it for the civil rights restoration that I'm in it for but are hoping to find a girlfriend,I guess through pity sex and those are the asshats I hate. My message to the asshats: Hey,I'm not in your singles bars so stay out of my movement. But anyway back to the article.
But prison bosses discovered traces of illegal substances on her - and banned her from the Lanarkshire jail.
What fucking irony. Don't expect me to feel sorry for her.
"Lesley had everything planned out and was excited about choosing a dress and flowers.
Yes,this is what matters to them;flowers and dresses. Certainly not the death of a relative and worse yet,marriage to that relative's killer.
"Lesley is distraught as it means the wedding is off for the time being. She is hoping to rearrange it if she is ever allowed back in to see her fiance.
Yep,the whole universe revolves around her. It's just her her her.
"She doesn't want to wait until he's released from jail, as it could be a long time."
This is probably due to the fact he will lose some points with her because he not as much of a "bad boy" as someone who is locked up also once freed he will have other women to look at and she will lose her "queen bee" status.
But the source added: "Lesley's family are delighted. They never forgave her for standing by the man who killed her brother. She has been completely disowned."
(sarcasm)Gee,I fucking wonder why.(/sarcasm) At least there are some people in this article I can respect.
Lesley, who had been seeing Ronald for a year, kept a vigil by her brother's hospital bedside but he died four days later.
Keeping vigil like a vulture. She probably wanted to make sure he was dead.
He claimed he stabbed Scott in self-defence while trying to protect Lesley, who was pregnant.
The old chivilary routine. It's like I said,chivilary is the hiding place of cowards and scoundrels.
But the jury took just 20 minutes to convict him.
The jury didn't buy it. That's a second group of people mentioned in this article that I can respect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)