Saturday, March 19, 2011
Warning:fake men's rights site
I would like to warn people about a fake men's rights site by the name The Good Men Project. You may think they are legit but there are a feminist front specifically fronted by Ms. magazine. Feminists are not on our side and they are trying to derail the MRM. Think about it,if they were on our side they would have never championed Lorena Bobbitt and condoned what she did. If they were on our side they wouldn't have started "take your daughter to work day" while ignoring boys or worse indoctrinating them with feminist filth,making them feel guilty to be males. If they were on our side they wouldn't use skewed DV stats that paint men as the aggressors and women as victims. If they were on our side they wouldn't have championed VAWA. The thing is they are not on our side and they will never be on our side and if you have any doubts read feminist quotes by feminists held in high regard amongst their peers and endorsed by major feminist organizations. These quotes should show exactly how feminists view men and what they would like to do to men. If you don't believe me other REAL MRA's such as Paul Elam and Bernard Chapin can confirm it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
24 comments:
Maybe we should consider disclosing this to the public so that people will know what feminists truly are?
I have not seen any opinions yet on mens rights sites about the death of feminist Geraldine Ferraro, any takers.
Thanks for revealing this fact. We must be careful of feminist deceptions in future. Because of when the men's activities become improve the feminists will definitely try to crush.
Matthew, those feminist don't represent all of us.
those feminist don't represent all of us.
IOW NAWALT
Nope not buying it.
Also we keep forging ahead,brothers as we have their attention.
"IOW NAWALT"
Sorry, what does that mean?
"Nope not buying it."
Okay. But it doesn't represent me, so it doesn't represent all of us.
"Also we keep forging ahead,brothers as we have their attention."
I learned about the men's movement in the form of men's studies in university six years ago already. Thought it is a good thing, a good subject. I still do. Afer all, I'm a feminist (in the official meaning of the word). I really do want both sexes to fare as well, no matter what words you put in my mouth ;).
It means:
In other words(IOW):"not all women are like that".(NAWALT)
Something we've all heard before but no longer believe because the truth indicates otherwise.
Maybe we should consider disclosing this to the public so that people will know what feminists truly are?
This blog is public as anyone can come here. Tell your friends.
Actually, I found the site to be carefully balanced between a feminist agenda and a men's rights agenda. It's not a fake men's right site - it doesn't claim to support men's rights at all so much as make a 'good man.' The many writers that contribute make it a large host of voices with opinions that dot the scale.
-Fi
"It's not a fake men's right site - it doesn't claim to support men's rights at all so much as make a 'good man.'"
Any attempt to suggest that masculinity is broken,or "needs to evolve", or that you need anything besides basic common courtesy to be "a good man",is sexism.
Feminism is anti-male sexism, it is FEMINine supremacISM.
I believe these are also referred to as "False Flag" sites. The He-Man Woman Hater's Club on the care2.com site is the first one I ever found. I joined only to discover the forum was run by two beechatchkas.
Laura Grace Robbins had a blog a while back in which she said AWALT, if they think they can get away with it. Sounds right to me.
Men would be like that, but men police other men. Women never police other women, not even women who kill their kids or husbands.
Anonymous age 69
Curious Female, what feminism is today is a buffet ideology: "Well, I'll have me some of that voting, and I really want some equal pay, and how about some cash for women's shelters, but no, sir, don't want any of that Selective Service. I also don't want any abortion on my plate." Girl, either we are equal all the way, or Pandora needs to close that damn box. Problem with buffet feminism is that the feminist leaders have to serve ALL of the dishes. When you support feminist leaders, you support the entire buffet. -tonysprout
Tonysprout,
That's just the thing: they are going to cherry pick as long as they can get away with it. Having women police each other is like having 5 year olds police each other. It doesn't work.
"Having women police each other is like having 5 year olds police each other. It doesn't work."
Maybe, maybe not. But it doesn't hurt to request them to do so. That way, even if they don't do so, they will feel pressured to seem like they are doing so. And that. . . can be a tactical victory.
I understand the subversive intent of GMP, however, I think it will backfire in a positive way for the MRM. GMP is like a jumping off point, for example I stumbled upon the site a while ago, I didn't know about the MRM but articles and discussions on that site lead me to searches which hit me smack in the face with the MRM in it's authentic form. The point is that no person truly interested in men's rights will be confused by GMP from the very beginning I was confused by its seemingly anti-male articles. It just doesn't seem authentic but it leads readers to questions which lead readers to the real MRM.
Either way GMP cannot damage the MRM it can only attract more men to it even if only by proxy. Any man who finds GMP will inevitably be lead sooner rather than later to the real MRM.
Men are much harder to lead and "herd" than women. That's both a strength and a weakness, and MRAs have to work with it. Regardless if the GMP is a false flag, or if there is the shred of a fig leaf in there, then it will serve the purpose awakening more men to the big picture and the "guys and girls behind the curtain" so to speak.
Curious Female: WARNING, YOU HAVE NOW REACHED AN EXTREMISTS WEBSITE! PLEASE SAVE YOURSELF BEFORE YOU ARE BRAINWASHED BY IDIOCY!
NOTE: THESE ARE CYBORGS WHO THINK THEY'RE HUMAN BUT WERE CREATED AS A JOKE BY FEMINISTS JUST FOR FUN AND TO MAKE OUR LIVES MORE ENTERTAINING! PLEASE ENJOY.
when they invent a replacement for a vagina that works a well as a vibrator, I suppose men will have less to oomplain about. Right now, with the legislation passed ,women have the upper hand and they know it. Even women in the church won't speak up because they like the odds. But the US is being brought down because of it, and we will be judged for it.
Ahahahahha, this was the Google Ad served up for your page:
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/simgad/8423051564716410456
You "Men's Rights" sad-sacks are adorable.
Joe,
How about women who get breast implants or liposuction? Do you jump on them too or do you look to men to be the recipients of your shaming?
I'm glad that you have the balls to classify women in one group of man-hating-bitch-sluts that you KNOW are just asking for it. I absolutely HATE feminists and I applaud you for finally having a site dedicated to protecting and promoting the rights the class/power majority.
I also hate that they think all men are a bunch of shameless rapists that should share their power with the OBVIOUSLY lesser sex. I mean, we know we're not all some singly defined, faceless oppressor that they can just project hate at.
I don't think I even can address the irony. Those of you who get it, will get it. I don't think this site's operator will, though, because he seems REALLY, REALLY stupid. Like missed the 500 points for his own name on the SAT stupid. I think that there could be a legitimate discussion between passionate and compassionate individuals about the rights of the two sexes and that most of the commentors on this post fall into that category. But the moderator(just him, don't twist this into some freak-outy generalization) is so stupid that we could give him directions to his backyard for the meeting place and he wouldn't be able to find it.
I know you're moderating this, Masculist Man, so it probably won't make it into the thread. But I'd like to thank you for reading this far (can you even read?) and just call you out on being such a idiotic and uneducated retard. I know that's not very PC but you don't give a fuck about being PC so I think you can appreciate it.
You know how I can tell when I'm dealing with some feminist fucktard? When they use the screen name "real macho man". Your sarcasm has been noticed but I don't know anything about repairing vibrators so I can't help you.
If this is Cathy Brennan we fucked you up good. I'm thinking about the agent orange files and how you thought some judge was going to assist you in carrying out your feminazi schemes against the men you've victimized and that judge told you to fuck off. That was cool.
I ended up here by accident. I had no idea that many men hated women, well I guess no shock knowing how many women hate men. I just thought guys are more .. hmm they use more logic then emotions. That my view based on so many wonderful men I am lucky to know. But I guess you are nothing like them, just a bunch of sissies and Real guys would laugh in your face, as well as real women laugh at so called feminists. U criticize them yet this is exactly who u are, male versions of sexually frustrated feminists. Pathetic.
Post a Comment