Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Senator McCaskill to introduce misandric bill

From SAVE Services:

The addition of the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination (Campus SaVE) Act to last year's Violence Against Women Act increased awareness of the campus sexual assault issue, and it brought new regulations from the Department of Education.

Unfortunately, campus radicals have now exploited this effort, claiming that "one in five college women are victims of sexual assault" and insisting that "we live in a rape culture." They want to remove fundamental due process protections!

If that's not bad enough, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) is going to introduce a new bill that we believe will further erode due process protections of students accused of sexual assault.

So this week, SAVE is announcing the establishment of the Campus Justice Coalition, which will focus on legislative reforms to restore due process and fairness to the sexual assault adjudicatory process: click here

The CJC will consist of representatives of university associations, attorneys, media representatives, parents of the wrongly accused, and other concerned citizens.

Can you help with this effort? We need to raise $5,000 for media and promotion, including radio interviews, press releases, and Facebook, and we'd like to host a few DC lobbying events with CJC members.

Please make a tax deductible donation: click here. Every gift, big or small, is greatly appreciated!

Thank you,

teri

Teri Stoddard, Program Director
Stop Abusive and Violent Environments
www.saveservices.org

Woman breastfeeds 12 year old son

To those of you that breastfeed, this situation might seem a bit familiar to you.

It was about a month ago. I was standing in line at the movie theater, waiting to purchase two tickets to the new X-Men movie. My son, Mason, was standing in front of me. My shirt was off and he was drinking milk from my boobs while we waited in line.

“Ma’am, you need to stop that right now,” shouted the ticket clerk from behind his bullet proof glass.

Now, only a few people had noticed us prior to this, but now that he had drawn attention to us, everyone was looking at us.

“What’s wrong? Never see a woman’s boobs before?” I yelled, waving my free breast at the gawkers. I could feel Mason get uncomfortable as he pulled in closer to my body and his teeth scraped on my boob.

“No, honey. Don’t be scared,” I told him, squeezing his ears between my boobs so he couldn’t hear them.

“I am a mother and I have every right to feed my child in public. If you have a problem with that, you can avert your eyes, but my son is feeding and will continue to feed until we are both satisfied.”

I stood up for myself, and I felt good, but this story doesn’t end like one of those feel good stories you hear on the local news. None of the patrons came to my defense, and they actually cheered as security escorted me and my son out of the theater.

This is just another day for me. This is what it’s like to be a mother that breastfeeds. This is what it’s like to live in world that hates women’s bodies.

But, this isn’t about me. It’s about my son. His name is Mason. He’s twelve years old, and now that he stands at eye level with me, he has to bend over a bit when I breastfeed him in public. Sure, it’s a little jarring when people see what appears to be a grown man sucking on a woman’s breasts, but it’s natural and their discomfort is not my problem.

The fact of the matter is, if it weren’t natural, I wouldn’t still produce milk, and it wouldn’t feel good to breast feed my son. Because of the sexual repression of women, there’s little information on the sexual nerve receptors in the nipple and the rest of the titty, but when a baby sucks on a woman’s breast she experiences a bit of sexual pleasure. When a man does it, she receives even more pleasure because the breast is sensitive to facial hair, and now that my son Mason is old enough to grow facial hair, our breastfeeding sessions have become even more pleasurable for me.

I’ve even been encouraging my son to not shave because it feels even better when I feed him in public and I can feel his beard coming in. Which, oddly enough, makes even more people feel entitled to come up to me and tell me that what I am doing is wrong. It’s ironic that the more natural I make the breastfeeding, the more likely people are to call the police and report me for indecency.

But, you know what? I press on. Because at the end of the day, it’s my body, and it’s my choice, and I don’t care what the state or the manager of Kohl’s or even what Mason has to say about it – I’m going to keep breastfeeding my son in public because I’m a mom and moms have rights too.

I’m going to keep breast feeding my son until my body decides that it’s time to stop, and I get the feeling that my body isn’t producing milk because Mason needs it, it’s producing milk because my body knows that we live in a problematic society that discourages women from letting their children suck on their boobs in public. That and I have a hormonal imbalance.


Source

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Defeat Kay Hagan defeat Hillary Clinton

From Stop Hillary PAC:

Hillary Clinton is running for President.

Hillary and her campaign are secretly plotting their road map to win the presidency with as little resistance as possible.

Fortunately, I have inside information on her plans -- and more importantly -- we have a strategy to stop her.

What I can tell you right now: Hillary's plan to win the presidency goes right through the state of North Carolina.

North Carolina, along with a small handful of other states, is essential to Hillary being elected president, and she and her super PAC, "Ready for Hillary" are going all-in to make it happen.

I'm writing you today to ask you to chip in to help me stop them.

You see, essential to winning North Carolina in 2016, Hillary must first reelect Kay Hagan, the liberal incumbent Senator who has already endorsed Hillary's run for the presidency.

That's right; Senator Kay Hagan from North Carolina is already endorsing Hillary for President.

In typical Washington D.C. fashion, Senator Kay Hagan has endorsed Hillary for President -- and Hillary will endorse Hagan for re-election.

That's why I'm announcing our plans today to defeat Kay Hagan for re-election. If we can defeat Senator Hagan's re-election, we blow a huge hole in Hillary's plan to be elected president.

But I can't do this alone, and that's why I'm asking you to chip in right now to help me defeat Senator Kay Hagan today. Will you chip in as much as $50 to help us defeat Hillary's personal choice for Senate in North Carolina?

How important is North Carolina to win the presidency?

Here are the facts:

• In 2008, Barack Obama won North Carolina by 1 point and in 2012, he lost North Carolina by 1 point -- North Carolina is a true swing state;

• 3 of the last 4 Governors of North Carolina have been Democrats;

• Liberal Super PACs beholden to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have already invested over 8 million dollars in re-electing Kay Hagan. That is more than any other Senate race in the country; AND

• Kay Hagan's campaign has outraised her opponent by more that 5-1 -- this week she placed a media buy for 4 million dollars.

North Carolina will be the state that decides who is the next President of the United States. That's why Hillary Clinton and her Super PAC's are going all-in.

And that's why I'm asking for your immediate help.

Will you join me by making a special, urgent contribution to our special fund to defeat liberal Senator Kay Hagan for re-election and deal a decisive blow to Hillary's plans to win the presidency? Some dedicated supporters have donated as much as $100 and $500. For others, $25 and $50 is a sacrificial gift.

Whatever you do, please commit to something. Even $10 will help us target the right voters to defeat Senator Hagan.

Current polls put Kay Hagan only 2.4% ahead of her GOP challenger.

This is a race we can -- MUST -- win.

While all races for U.S. Senate are important this year, North Carolina has more on the line than most because it will decide who our next president is.

That's why your support today is so important.

Will you chip in?

Sincerely,

Senator Ted Harvey
Chairman, Stop Hillary PAC

P.S. North Carolina -- and the re-election of liberal Senator Kay Hagen -- holds the key to Hillary's run for the presidency. That's why Stop Hillary PAC is announcing today our campaign to defeat Kay Hagan and blow a hole through Hillary's plans.

Will you please make an urgent contribution to ensure we have the resources to launch a hard-hitting campaign to defeat Hillary and Kay Hagan today? Please, click here to chip in.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Woman sets man up to be robbed



Updated: Wednesday, July 16 2014, 06:46 PM CDT By JOZANNAH QUINTANILLA
News 4 Reporter SAN ANTONIO- Police have arrested one suspect and are searching for two others after they allegedly kidnapped and tortured a man. The victim, a San Patricio County man in his 20's, said he escaped from a San Antonio motel where he was being held. Police say the man responded to a Backpage online ad for an escort and met 24-year-old Vanessa Ann Luna at a hotel in Corpus Christi. According to the victim, Luna and another suspect tied him up and tortured him. He says they then drove him to a San Antonio hotel, where another suspect joined in beating him. Police say the three suspects forced him to withdraw money from his checking account before he was able to escape. Police arrested Luna but are still searching for the other two suspects, 30-year-old Christopher Perez and another man who goes by the name of "Popeye." If you have any information on these suspects police are asking you to call the SAPD Special Victims Unit at (210) 207-2313 or CRIME STOPPERS at 210-224-STOP (7867).


Source

Definitions

There have been a lot of definitions to MRA's,PUA's,MGTOWers,Masculinists and Masculists and they have been mutually exclusive. But what if they are not. What if they are not mutually exclusive but in fact stages. I believe that true MRA's (those that avoid feminism and leave the admin duties and editorial policy to the MEN there) and Masculinists/Masculists can get along. There are the pro-feminist stooges but they are not part of this discussion. Certainly both groups can combat misandry in the cultural and legal arenas of their respective societies. Certainly a lot of PUA's have adopted MRA/Masculinist tactics in standing up to women and chellenging them. A lot of guys before the PUA thing just played it nice. While it may be true that PUA's are avoiding the political arena it is also true that a lot of MRA's/Masculinists/Masculists have used PUA tactics to get women. MGTOWers may have or have not,depends. I believe they would be the last group to use PUA tactics but if they wanted to they would employ them. I'm not saying PUA's are the supreme way to go far from it but those tactics are used. If a PUA gets tired of the shallow bar scene and a lot of them do they may either become MGTOWers or MRA's/Masculinists/Masculists. If they want to make a difference on all levels: cultural,legal,social and societial in general then they'll embrace the latter definition. These are the various stages of the manosphere.