A thank you from Dan Matthews

Thank you for the tremendous show of generosity and support during our last fundraising drive. We were able to exceed our goal of $10,000 and ensure that voters of the 2nd District were able to see our latest ad revealing the truth about Rick Larsen.

Your support could not have come at a more crucial time in this election as we continue our Get-Out-The-Vote efforts.

Though our ad-campaign moneybomb is over, we can still use your help!

With only two weeks before the election, every little bit counts. Please visit our site and sign up to volunteer or donate.

And as always, thank you for all that you have done and continue to do.

Sincerely,

Dan Matthews

To contribute to Dan's campaign click here

You guys are awesome. You really came through for a pro-male candidate and for that you should be proud and give yourselves a pat on the back. Hopefully Dan Matthews is victorious this Movember (not a typo). If you are one of Dan Matthews constituents and you are an MRA or a MRA sympathizer then by all means elect Dan Matthews to Congress.

Dan Matthews needs your help

I don't advocate voting for candidates unless they are male friendly and Dan Matthews fits that bill. That is why we are endorsing Dan Matthews for Congress. On one side is Dan "pro-men's rights" Matthews and on other side is Rick "pro-feminism" Larsen. We need Matthews in office so the best thing to do is support him in his bid for that Congressional seat. You can view a video Dan made here and perhaps support him financially. This guy is taking a chance on us so if you can make a donation.

Let's encourage Dan Matthews one more time

Dan Matthews is the Republican Congressional candidate representing the 2nd district of Washington state. Matthews has been in favor of men's rights: click here However Matthews has flipped flop: click here

Of course it doesn't help when Rick Larsen,the Democratic incumbent,makes statements such as:

“So long as you don’t spend a lot of time talking about certain issues with folks with those sort of views and just focus on the issues where you agree. You have to commit to working with Democrats and Republicans when you take this job. But coming back to Todd Akins, what he said was not just scientifically inaccurate, it was morally reprehensible. The view of some of the folks in the Republican party on women and the role in society, is just as reprehensible. While I was arguing for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) on the floor of the House, my opponent Dan Matthews posted on his website this.” Rep. Larsen drew out a piece of paper and read me a quote that I have reproduced here. It is from Matthews website although he has since pulled it down, it is still reproduced online on a “Men’s Rights” blog here.

Larsen's quote:click here

Guess who's blog Larsen is refering to? Yes,yours truly.

The only solution as I see it: to tell Dan Matthews that men's concerns are a politically viable and it is a safe position to take. If he hears from a lot of us he may stand up to feminist favoring likes of Rick Larsen and festering pus of the femocratic party. Let's let him know today.

Email: info@danmatthewsforcongress.com

Dan Matthews on the radio

From an email:

Want to hear Dan Matthews in a live Candidate Forum this weekend?

You don't even need to leave your house...

Listen in to Saturday Morning Live on KGMI 790 AM

from 8:15 to 8:45, this Saturday, July 28
to hear a live and moderated discussion of the issues with Dan Matthews,
incumbent Congressman Rick Larsen and other Primary Election opponents.

If you aren't getting good reception, try listening online.

Hope you have the chance to listen in, thank you for your support!

This is the show Dan Matthews is going to be on. Let's call in and let him know that men's rights is something safe to bank on and that he will receive support if it's symbiotic.

Dan Matthews sticks up for men

Dan Matthews

“Violence against women is morally repulsive and totally unacceptable. Shame on Rick Larsen and his Democrat colleagues for unnecessarily politicizing such important issues to gain political points.

The habit of Rep. Larsen to pander about with talk of a non-existent “war on women” clearly demonstrates why there is so much gridlock in Washington, D.C. There are a broad range of reasonable concerns with regard to the VAWA. When are we going to have an adult conversation over the challenges we face without demonizing those with other points of view? It’s time for some leadership.

The VAWA offers women both a 'tactical advantage' and a 'powerful weapon' when they want to 'get back' at a man, have regrets the next morning, or want out of a marriage for any reason at all. Allegations of abuse can cause men to lose their homes, jobs, children, and reputations in the community. Once they've been thrown in jail because of mandatory arrests and have been assumed guilty, where do they go to get their reputations and their jobs back when the accusations are proven false? "...get used to seeing these kinds of re-directions throughout the coming weeks as Rick Larsen ducks the central issues of this campaign..." In the past, even the ACLU had problems with some Constitutional protections being lost in the Act. The right to face one’s accuser certainly comes to mind. We need to examine the mindset that all men are guilty and all women are victims. Law enforcement officials observe that at times it is women who are perpetuators of domestic violence. A balanced and objective review of the Act demonstrates that the Act does not adequately protect men from false allegations.

With regard to the provisions for illegal immigrants, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, argued during a hearing that those accused of abusing women should be interviewed to check if the victims are trying to game the system. "Currently, there are no safeguards in place to prevent fraud or to prevent an immigrant from fabricating tales of spousal abuse," Smith said. "Claims of battery and abuse go unchallenged. The immigrant is presumed to be the victim." Immigration law should not be a means for abusers to attack their victims, and this Act should not provide an opening for immigrants to play the system. Due process is still a central tenet of our Constitution – for women and men alike.

In addition, this is but another example of constantly turning to federal control rather than local control of issues, thereby creating or expanding another federal bureaucracy. Reauthorization of the Violence against Women Act ignores the fact that those in state and local government are better caretakers of these types of victims and better punishers of these types of criminals. The knee-jerk reaction of Rick Larsen to remove this issue from local control and give more power to Washington DC betrays his mistrust of our own citizens -- and of our local law enforcement officials -- to take care of our own.

Finally, get used to seeing these kinds of re-directions throughout the coming weeks as Rick Larsen ducks the central issues of this campaign: his miserable record on the economy and jobs, and his appalling abandonment of veterans."

Source:click here

About time someone spoke out in favor of men's issues and that someone is Dan Matthews. If you live in Dan's district and you're tired of the same old feminist crap and want a breath of fresh air vote for Dan Matthews. Dan Matthews definitely takes men's concerns seriously.