Showing posts with label misandry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misandry. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Bill Cosby is a free man

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned the indecent assault conviction of Bill Cosby on Wednesday and ordered his release from prison after finding that he was denied protection against self-incrimination.

The court said that a prosecutor's decision not to charge Cosby, 83, in an earlier case opened the door for him to speak freely in a lawsuit against him, thinking he would not incriminate himself criminally. A second prosecutor later used the lawsuit testimony in a criminal trial, and that testimony was key in his conviction years later.

Cosby was convicted on three felony counts of aggravated indecent assault in 2018 of drugging and assaulting Andrea Constand in 2004, and was serving a three- to 10-year sentence. He has served nearly three years of the sentence.

The state Supreme Court said Cosby cannot be retried on the same charges.

Why Pennsylvania Supreme Court is vacating Bill Cosby sexual assault conviction after two years. "When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness," according to the high court opinion authored by Justice David Wecht.

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged."

The prosecution of Cosby was one of the first major milestones of the #MeToo movement, as women came forward with their tales of unwanted sexual advances and harassment in the workplace.

Cosby’s spokesman Andrew Wyatt thanked the comedian's legal team and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, calling Wednesday's ruling a moment of justice for Black Americans.

"This is the justice Mr. Cosby has been fighting for," Wyatt said in a statement. "They saw the light. He waived his Fifth Amendment right and settled out of court. He was given a deal and he had immunity. He should have never been charged."

Cosby spokesman says overturned conviction is ‘justice for Black America,’ former prosecutor reacts. Constand released a joint statement with her attorneys on Wednesday, asserting that she was never privy to any kind of prosecutorial deal with Cosby in 2005.

"Today's majority decision regarding Bill Cosby is not only disappointing but of concern in that it may discourage those who seek justice for sexual assault in the criminal justice system from reporting or participating in the prosecution of the assailant or may force a victim to choose between filing either a criminal or civil action," the statement said.

About two hours after the ruling was published on Wednesday, Cosby was released from the SCI Phoenix detention center about 35 miles northeast of Philadelphia, where he had been housed as inmate No. NN7687, a corrections official said.

The freed Cosby was driven to his home Elkins Park, which is about 25 miles southeast of the prison. He was helped out of the car while wearing a maroon T-shirt and baggy blue pants.

Cosby emerged from the house a short time later wearing a T-shirt of Central High School in Philadelphia. A handful of supporters cheered him with shouts of "hey, hey, hey," an homage to the animated character he voiced, Fat Albert.

He raised a fist, but did not answer any questions from reporters.

Cosby later called in to local Philadelphia radio station WDAS-FM, where he said the audience needed "clarity, they need guidance."

"Because this is not just a Black thing," Cosby said. "This is for all the people who have been imprisoned wrongfully regardless of race, color, or creed. Because I met them in there. People who talked about what happened and what they did. And I know there are many liars out there."

Cosby also tweeted a statement on Wednesday following his release from prison: "I have never changed my stance nor my story. I have always maintained my innocence. Thank you to all my fans, supporters and friends who stood by me through this ordeal. Special thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for upholding the rule of law."

Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele lamented Cosby’s release and characterized the state high court’s findings as a "procedural issue."

“He was found guilty by a jury and now goes free on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime,” Steele said in a statement.

“I want to commend Cosby’s victim Andrea Constand for her bravery in coming forward and remaining steadfast throughout this long ordeal, as well as all of the other women who have shared similar experiences. My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims.”

The entertainer once dubbed “America’s Dad” was sent to state prison following his 2018 conviction for drugging and sexually assaulting Constand.

She testified that Cosby assaulted her at his Pennsylvania home in 2004 after she came to him for career advice.

But Bruce Castor, the Montgomery district attorney at the time, declined to press charges against the comedian and actor, "thereby allowing Cosby to be forced to testify in a subsequent civil action," according to the high court.

Bill Cosby officially released from Pennsylvania prison after overturned conviction. "Unable to invoke any right not to testify in the civil proceedings, Cosby relied upon the district attorney’s declination and proceeded to provide four sworn depositions. During those depositions, Cosby made several incriminating statements," Justice Wecht wrote in a 79-page opinion, joined by Justices Debra Todd, Christine Donohue and Sallie Updyke Mundy.

"The fruits of Cosby’s reliance upon D.A. Castor’s decision — Cosby’s sworn inculpatory testimony — were then used by D.A. Castor’s successors against Cosby at Cosby’s criminal trial."

Justice Kevin Dougherty sided with the majority and said large swaths of Cosby's prosecution amounted to a "coercive bait-and-switch," after Castor did not push a criminal case.

But Dougherty said vacating the conviction was not a proper remedy and argued that Cosby could be tried again, just without evidence obtained from the comedian's civil suit deposition.

"We can order it suppressed," wrote Dougherty, who was joined by Chief Justice Max Baer. "And in fact this is precisely what this Court and many others have done in comparable situations."

Justice Thomas Saylor wrote in dissent and said Castor's decision not to prosecute Cosby was never set in stone for all following district attorneys.

Castor's action was just "a present exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the temporary occupant of the elected office of district attorney that would in no way be binding upon his own future decision-making processes, let alone those of his successor," Saylor wrote.

The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) decried the state high court ruling. “We are deeply disappointed in today’s ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and by the message this decision sends to the brave survivors who came forward to seek justice for what Bill Cosby did to them," RAINN President Scott Berkowitz said in a statement. "This is not justice.”

And Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women, bemoaned Cosby's release as the result of a "technicality."

"Today, the judicial system in America failed survivors again," Nunes said in a statement.

"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned Bill Cosby’s conviction for sexual assault not because anyone doubted his guilt of numerous crimes, but because of a prior legal agreement’s impact on the trial. Bill Cosby is free on a technicality, but the women he assaulted, who bravely came forward to bring him to justice, are suffering anew. They thought they had finally achieved some limited measure of closure — and now this."

In a rare jailhouse interview in 2019, Cosby said he wouldn't offer any remorse for his actions — even if that would've affected a parole board's decision.

"When I come up for parole, they're not going to hear me say that I have remorse. I was there. I don't care what group of people come along and talk about this when they weren't there. They don't know," Cosby told the news outlet BlackPressUSA.com.

Source

Friday, August 14, 2020

Terrence Popp responds to Tomi Lahren



This video is fucking funny. Perhaps one of Popp's best.

If Biden-Harris win men lose-royally







Yeah,she said it








In the first video Erick James talks about prisons and he is right on. In fact, the squad may send a lot of men to various prisons.

Let's put the puzzle together.

Part of Team Biden is Kamala Harris, Biden's running mate,AOC and Beto O'Rourke.

In the event, Joe Biden should win.

The first thing the Biden-Harris regime would do is implement gun confiscation programs against those they don't like. If you are a fellow socialist or feminist and you like firearms there is a good chance you may get to keep your gun otherwise they'll confiscate it. After they have disarmed law-abiding citizens they will implement the rest of their plan.

Joe Biden has always been a scatterbrained moron but now he is much worse. He is not competent to be President. Which means Kamala Harris would become the new President. If she does tremendous good she will receive boatloads of accolades. On the other hand, if she royally fucks up she is going to get shovel loads of shit. Women love to take credit but they hate to take responsibility so I'm guessing they'll keep old Joe around to take the blame when things go south and they will.

Now comes the fun part: using Presidential Executive Orders to bypass Congress. What? Congress won't pass the New Green Deal? Screw them. We'll just issue an Executive Order. If you are homosexual who hates heterosexuals and you want to round them up and place them in extermination camps but Congress and the Constitution say you can't do that. Screw them. Just fill out an Executive Order, old Joe will sign it and Homeland Security will enforce it. It is that easy. Ladies, are you fed up with happy men who enjoy their lives? What about the guys who are breathing air you could breathe? Should they be allowed to get away with it? If you said "no" then just fill out an Executive Order, Joe will sign it and someone else will inform Homeland Security who will enforce it. It is that easy and the best thing is you'll never be held accountable because if things do go wrong old Joe will take the blame. He won't remember anything and it's a safe bet you're not going to admit what you did so no one will take the blame. Want to destroy someone's life or possibly end their life? Just fill out an Executive Order. Joe will sign it. It will be handed off to Homeland Security to enforce it so sit back and enjoy the show. Bask in the enjoyment that you hurt someone and you got away with it.

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

Egard Watch Company CEO Ilan Srulovicz Fires Back At Gillette’s “Toxic Masculinity” Ads With His Own Ad



Companies like Gillette have been demonizing men for some time now in an effort to cater to the sensitivities of “woke,” angry women. Apparently, the answer to women’s issues is the degradation and devaluation of men. Or so it would seem according to advertising messages like those of Gillette who claim masculinity is “toxic.”

Not all men are rapists, sexual abusers, bullies, or violent yet that’s what the progressive left would have us believe. Somehow women gain integrity and value by making all men into villains.

One company CEO has had enough of this negative messaging aimed at tearing men down and has made his own advertisement in an attempt to refute Gillette’s allegation that all masculinity is toxic.

Check out the advertisement made by CEO and founder of Egard Watch Company, Ilan Srulovicz.

Srulovicz also wrote a piece explaining his reasoning behind making the advertisement, which we think is just as important as the ad itself. He explains that he made the ad himself, everything from the voiceover, to the editing, to the financing because he, and others within his company, were concerned over negative backlash.

“I considered releasing it anonymously but after some thought, I realized an individual releasing the message wasn’t going to have the same impact as a company doing it. I decided to risk it and post the video.

I think what put me over the top is a quote I heard that says all actions come out of either love or fear. Releasing it anonymously felt like fear. Putting my company on the line for a message I believe in felt like love.

I went with love.”

If you watched the video, you can feel the love he put into making it and you can feel the love of the real men in the world. The ones who work hard, never quit, and support their families with everything they have. The ones who run into burning buildings and towards tragic accidents with the hope and intention of saving someone else’s life. The ones who would lay down their own lives to protect and save others. The ones who work excessively long work days to keep our society going. The ones that Gillette seems to have conveniently forgotten about, or rather ignored.

In his video, Srulovicz cited several statistics that really shed some light on the fact that men are, in reality, not the toxic members of society the left makes them out to be.

He goes on to say, “We are so polarized. It’s all about “taking sides.” I am guilty of it myself because it’s all we are fed all day long, but I don’t want to be a part of that anymore. None of us, no gender or race, has exclusivity on being terrible or wonderful. Individuality is the measure of a person, not the “identity” or “category” to which you belong.”

Thus the problem with identity politics. It completely negates the ability of the individual to establish their own character.

Srulovicz makes a really compelling argument when he says that the Gillette ad does not inspire men to be better but rather indifferent and closed off.

He says, “My belief is that if you want to “make men better,” as Gillette claims it wants to do, then the best way to do that is to show the best of us, not the worst. When I see a man risking his life running into a burning building, it makes me want to be better. When I see a father who will stand by his kids no matter what, it makes me want to be better. When I see a soldier putting everything on the line to preserve my freedom, I want to be better. That’s what a man is to me and they represent a far greater majority of men than what Gillette portrayed a man to be.

I don’t feel I want to be better when an ad starts off with “toxic masculinity” or a bunch of boys bullying each other and portraying men as caricatures of sexual deviants. I simply close off.”

We applaud Srulovicz and his video that shows men being what true men really are. Share his video if you agree!


Source

The next time you are looking for a watch make it an Egard Watch.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Elizabeth Warren embraces misandry

2020 presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren appealed to young women with a plethora of life advice in a video Wednesday, saying, “Dump the guy who ghosted you.”

The Massachusetts senator discussed “everything from student debt to reproductive rights” in an exclusive video with Elle titled “I’ve Got A Plan For That.”

The video features questions that Elle readers submitted for Warren, such as, “I’ve been casually dating a guy for the past three months, but now he’s ghosting me. He won’t return my texts, but he still looks at all my Instagram Stories. What do I do?”

“Give him up,” Warren said in the video. “You’re too good for him. If he wants to go silent, let him go. He is not the one for you.”

“You’re better than that,” she whispered. Warren tweeted out the video with the caption, “You deserve better. Dump the guy who ghosted you, convince the roommate to let you adopt a dog, and I’ll take care of canceling your student loan debt!”

You deserve better. Dump the guy who ghosted you, convince the roommate to let you adopt a dog, and I'll take care of canceling your student loan debt!

Elizabeth Warren Wants You to Ditch That Guy, Get a Dog, and Vote to Tax the Rich
In an exclusive video with ELLE.com, Warren answers reader questions because—if you haven't heard—she has a plan for that.

Another reader posed the question to Warren, “I really want a dog, but my roommate isn’t into the idea. How do I convince her?”

Warren suggested bringing the reluctant roommate along to the dog shelter to convince her that a dog is a good idea.

“Make it specific, and you’ll have a roommate who will be into a dog.”

The 2020 presidential candidate also discussed a question on student loan debt, promising to eradicate student debt, and suggested that to take the perfect selfie, you should “stop thinking about yourself.”

“When you go back and look at the selfies later on, what you mostly remember is what a great time you had,” Warren said. “For me, selfies are about fun. So have some fun!”


Source

Warren is making the same mistake Hillary made by dismissing or discounting the male vote. If I were a democrat I would be angry that Warren is playing the misandry card. This move will backfire on her and cost her support from men.

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Woman exploits vulnerable men to commit suicide

Hanna aka The Poison Ivy of New Zealand

'I would consider suicide if she would take herself with me': Victim tells of humiliation by teenage 'Poison Ivy', 17, who bullies 'weak' men into degrading themselves online before encouraging them to kill themselves
New Zealand teen Hanna, or 'Poison Ivy, grooms unstable men online
Lures 'socially awkward guys' into sexually degrading themselves
Hanna, 17, later entices the vulnerable men to commit suicide claim some of her followers
YouTube video has surfaced calling for victims to report Hanna
Her Twitter is flooded with photos from men declaring their love
One lover exclusively said he would consider suicide if she did the same
Do you know who Poison Ivy is? Email nelson.groom@mailonline.com
By NELSON GROOM FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA and PADDY DINHAM FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 09:48 EDT, 25 October 2016 | UPDATED: 22:51 EDT, 27 October 2016

A woman known as 'Poison Ivy' is grooming unstable men into sexually degrading themselves online before enticing them to commit suicide, it has been claimed.

Hanna, 17, from New Zealand, reportedly seeks vulnerable men in online gaming communities before 'bullying' them into sexually humiliating themselves in the public eye.

A chilling YouTube video has surfaced shedding light on Hanna's seemingly sinister activities and calling for victims to put an end to the abuse.

Hanna, 17, finds vulnerable men in online gaming communities before blackmailing them into humiliating themselves sexually

Hanna later encourages her vulnerable victims to commit suicide, it has been claimed by some men +13
Hanna later encourages her vulnerable victims to commit suicide, it has been claimed by some men

The clip claims: 'She encourages guys to do disgusting acts, via webcam on a live screen, like showing their genitals, spreading their butt cheeks on camera and sticking objects up their a**.'

He said the teenager chooses 'weak, socially awkward guys who have never had a girlfriend or a social life' before luring them into debasing themselves.

The YouTube video, uploaded by user MarsRPG, claims her goal is for her victims to 'kill themselves for her as an act of love.'

'This girl will not stop until these guys kill themselves. She grooms them for months. We need to report her,' he says.

Hanna's Twitter bio reads: 'I treat all men like s*** because they are weak and they deserve it. I bully the weak to make them weaker as I simultaneously grow stronger.'

Her account, which has over 900 followers, is flooded with images of men around the world declaring their love for her.

Her Twitter accounts is flooded with images and footage of men around the world declaring their love for her

A YouTube user has claimed Hanna seeks 'weak, socially awkward guys who have never had a girlfriend or a social life' before luring them into degrading themselves

Many of the men appear emotionally unstable, bursting into tears while begging for forgiveness

She also convinced one man to shave off his hair and eyebrows

Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, one of her lovers said he has no problem sharing her with other men, despite the fact she punishes them for talking to other girls.

Her grip on the man, from Corpus Christi, Texas, is so strong that he said he would actually think about killing himself if she was to do the same.

'I would consider suicide if she would take herself with me,' he said.

He added: 'We basically share her. I'm OK with it. But a few others take it too far. She tells me what she wants me to do over Skype. I love to Skype see... So yeah I do some pretty weird stuff for her but it's worth it cause she gives me attention.

'I don't get much attention. I've always been a loner. I dig dirt for a living, making holes in the ground to make swimming pools. So I don't get out much.

Alleged examples of conversations between Hanna and a man online

'I see myself as inferior to her so the rules don't necessarily apply to her. I know it sounds crazy but if you're in the situation and get the kind of attention you've never experienced before you overlook the hypocrisy.

'I'd never question her motives for fear that she'd stop talking to me.'

Poison Ivy has even convinced him to pour vinegar down the hole of his penis.

Many of the men appear emotionally unstable, bursting into tears while begging for forgiveness.

She convinces one man to shave off his beard and eyebrows, saying it will 'look hot' but once he does it and insecurely asks if she likes it, she replies 'Do you want me to be honest? No.'

She adds: 'I just wanted to see what you look like with no eyebrows.'

She also encourages him to put his head down the toilet in another video.

Just some of the men who have posted images of themselves with 'Hanna' written on them

A man who said he was in a relationship with Hanna posted this image to social media with the caption: 'I'm so sorry Hanna. Please take me back'

Hanna, who appears to be of Asian heritage, has several tweets explicitly glamourising suicide.

'And the only way to do is properly is for a couple to suicide together, because that way they will have been together forever, as they surely promised each other.'

However, Hanna refutes claims she has encouraged men to commit suicide.

'I do not, under any circumstances, encourage others to commit suicide. My intention was only to troll men responsible for harassing me online,' Hanna told Daily Mail Australia.

'Others have encouraged me to commit suicide,' insists the woman known as Poison Ivy.

The online temptress further says her Twitter statement which appears to glamourise suicide, was intended as nothing more than an 'inside joke among her friends'.

Hanna has detailed her full response in a video posted to YouTube.

For confidential support call the Samaritans on 116123 or visit a local Samaritans branch, see www.samaritans.org for details.

For confidential help, call Lifeline at 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue on 1300 224 636


Source

Feminism has led to.the destruction of men. By removing the father from the home and eliminating positive male role models and influences from our culture. It has led to led to a misandric environment where females can exploit and destroy men at will. Western society has given women special rights that men do not enjoy and as a result, women and a misandric society do not value men. They see men as disposable or worst yet,to be purposely destroyed for the continuation of their misandric society.I'm not going to post the photos of the guys that went through this hell. If you want to see them click on the link. What we are seeing is evil women who use and exploit vulnerable men through emotional manipulation by playing on their desire for a girlfriend and their desire to be loved and accepted. A natural human need exploited for evil purposes. It is because of these evil purposes that society exploits and magnifies that need through the media that men are nothing without a girlfriend or wife. That they are incomplete without one. This is the same media that tells women they don't need a man and encourage them to be evil and destroy men. This has to stop. Society has to take this shit seriously. There is however a redeeming factor and that is this: Hanna wrote that she is hoping to meet the male version of her. On that, we are on the same page because I hope she does meet the male version of her and I hope he does to her what she has done to these men.

Saturday, August 3, 2019

Male student at USC takes on title ix



To help Kursat Christoff Pekgoz click here.

This young man is engaging in activism. He is going about it in the right way. Let's support him.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

AOC Blames Man for “Sexist” Article…Written by Women

U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez issued a confusing tweet last week accusing a male CNN journalist of sexist reporting on a story that was actually penned by a pair of women.

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, popularly known as “AOC” by her followers and critics alike, replied to a tweet by CNN reporter Andrew Kaczyknski. The tweet linked to an article about U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren which revealed that the Democratic presidential candidate staged a lucrative side career as an attorney during her pre-Senate career as a Harvard law professor.

AOC took this as an offense. In a bizarre reply, the progressive lawmaker suggested that this was not only worth reporting on all, but to do so was akin to sexism. She also included jabs at Wall Street and Big Pharma, in line with her progressive persona.


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

@AOC
BREAKING NEWS: Lady Had A Job, Got Paid More Than Me

Nice work. Now do the amount of Wall Street, Big Pharma, & Fossil Fuel 💰 presidential candidates accepted over their careers & how much they’re taking now.

andrew kaczynski

@KFILE
While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/while-teaching-elizabeth-warren-worked-on-more-than-50-legal-matters-charging-as-much-as-675-an-hour/2019/05/22/9ce56840-7ce0-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html …

110K
5:42 AM - May 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
20.5K people are talking about this

The tweet here suggests that Kaczynski is simply upset that Warren, a woman, made more money than him. The senator was reportedly making around $675 per hour with her legal work during her tenured career at Harvard.

Apparently, the New York native overlooked a couple of things. First, the article in question was penned not by Kaczynski, but rather by two female researchers writing for the Washington Post. Elise Viebeck and Annie Linskey found that Warren dealt with at least 50 legal matters at the time.

The original story in question undercuts Warren’s image as some sort of working-class champion. Like AOC, Warren is typically perceived to be among the Democratic Party’s hard-left wing. This doesn’t stack up well considering Warren’s career as both an elite Ivy League professor as well as a very prolific attorney.

Obviously, there really isn’t anything sexist happening here — either by the Washington Post’s writers or by the CNN reporter. But, it portrays a far-left female politician in a negative light, and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez can’t have that. Shooting past the clear conclusion that Warren’s credentials as a pure progressive may be less than genuine, AOC is claiming that a sexist male is just trying to downplay a strong woman’s accomplishments.

This isn’t the first time Ocasio-Cortez enthusiastically pulled the “sexism” card where no sexist behavior took place. Earlier in her political career — which followed a bartending gig — the then-candidate for Congress accused conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro of “catcalling” her by challenging her to an on-air debate. Of course, the prospective representative would have had every right to simply say “no”, but she had to take it a step further.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

@AOC
Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions.

And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one.

188K
6:32 PM - Aug 9, 2018
57.7K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez remains a favorite among American progressive circles. Her proposed “Green New Deal”, which included far-reaching goals to rebuild every single building in the United States as well as ban air travel, has been embraced by Democratic Party ideologues and presidential candidates, including Elizabeth Warren.


Source

Thursday, April 18, 2019

This is so fucked up

Warwick Crown Court Judge Sarah Buckingham

Judge tells banned drink-driver who caused massive crash: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'

Victoria Parry smashed into three cars and had to be pulled from her burning Fiat

A judge told a banned drink-driver who smashed into three other vehicles that she would have been jailed if she were a man.

Judge Sarah Buckingham said "alcoholic" Victoria Parry would have been "straight down the stairs" to prison had her sex been different.

The 30-year-old, who already had two previous convictions for drink-driving was dragged from her Fiat Stilo after the car caught fire following the pile-up on the A46 last May.

Victoria Parry was told she would have been jailed if she were a man.

Victoria Parry was told she would have been jailed if she were a man.
READ MORE:
Judge faces probe after telling drink-driver: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'


Tests showed she was almost three times over the drink-drive limit, while Warwick Crown Court heard she had been drinking up to two bottles of wine a day.

Parry - left with a "considerable drink problem" after a 15-year abusive relationship - had also been banned from driving for three years in July 2015 for her second excess alcohol offence.

But - after calling the case "shocking" - the judge delayed sentencing Parry for three months after she admitted a charge of dangerous driving.

READ MORE:
Judge furiously blasted after telling drink-driver: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'


And the judge said: “If Miss Parry was a man, there is no question it would have been straight down the stairs, because this is a shocking case of dangerous driving against a background of two previous convictions for excess alcohol.

“But this offence was committed in May 2018 and she has not been in trouble since. She has clearly got an alcohol problem. She is, whether she admits it or not, an alcoholic.”

The crash happened at around 6.50pm on May 23 after Parry overtook in the middle of the road in the face of oncoming traffic on the A46 Stratford by-pass.

She smashed into a van, a Vauxhall Insignia and wrote off a BMW.

Her Fiat then plunged down an embankment and burst into flames in woodland.

Thomas Cook flight outfit row passenger sparks fierce This Morning row after being branded 'pathetic'

Parry, of Grange Road, Bearley, Stratford-upon-Avon, told an off-duty police officer who rushed to help that she had drunk a bottle of wine and "shouldn't be driving", the court heard.

Tim Sapwell, prosecuting, said Parry was arrested, and when she took a breath test at the police station almost two hours later, the reading was only just under three times the legal limit.

Lucy Tapper, defending, said: “There is deep and genuine regret on her part.

“Having a crash presents its own consequences in terms of what you’ve done, and to have your car burst into flames is quite terrifying. She says she thought she was going to die.

“This has been a very salutary lesson to her. I would ask that she be spared immediate custody, if at all possible.”

Miss Tapper said Parry had been in an abusive relationship for 15 years, and for the last five years had found herself with a considerable drink problem.

“She was unable to tackle that after the first offence and after the second offence, but since this matter she has all but stopped drinking.”

Judge Buckingham remarked: “All but! So she hasn’t stopped.”

Miss Tapper said Parry had ‘got it under control,’ and was no longer drinking two bottles of wine a day, and was out of the relationship and in a job where she had stepped down from a management role but was now working her way back up.

The judge commented: “If Miss Parry was a man, there is no question it would have been straight down the stairs, because this is a shocking case of dangerous driving against a background of two previous convictions for excess alcohol.

“But this offence was committed in May 2018 and she has not been in trouble since. She has clearly got an alcohol problem. She is, whether she admits it or not, an alcoholic.”

Deferring sentence, Judge Buckingham told Parry: “You richly deserve an immediate custodial sentence of 18 months. I want to see whether you can really address the issues rather than paying lip service.”

Schoolboy hospitalised after violent hammer attack in Lightwoods Park, Bearwood

Parry was ordered to abstain from alcohol, attend meetings of a body such as Alcoholics Anonymous, and to pay for private counselling to tackle her alcohol problem.

The judge told her: “If you succeed, I will not make the custody immediate. If you don’t comply, I will conclude that you are not worthy of the chance.”


Source

Sunday, February 24, 2019

Forcing only men to sign up for Selective Service has been ruled as gender discrimination against men

The National Coalition For Men (NCFM) is pleased with the court’s decision in NCFM v. Selective Service. Forcing only males to register is an aspect of socially institutionalized male disposability and helps reinforce the stereotypes that support discrimination against men in other areas such as child custody, divorce, criminal sentencing, paternity fraud, education, public benefits, domestic violence services, due process rights, genital autonomy, and more.

“Women are now allowed in combat, so this decision is long overdue,” said Marc Angelucci, attorney for NCFM. “After decades of sex discrimination against men in the Selective Service, the courts have finally found it unconstitutional to force only men to register. Even without a draft, men still face prison, fines, and denial of federal loans for not registering or for not updating the government of their whereabouts. Since women will be required to register with the Selective Service, they should face the same repercussions as men for any noncompliance.”


Source

Then there is this:

Only Drafting Men in War Is Gender ‘Discrimination,’ Federal Judge Rules
By Pluralist | Feb 25, 2019

“They’re hollering they don’t have equal ‘rights.'”

A federal judge in Texas ruled Friday than an all-male military draft is unconstitutional given that women can now serve in combat roles just as men do.

Judge Gray H. Miller of Federal District Court in the Southern District of Texas noted that the Supreme Court’s 1981 ruling in favor of excluding women from the draft was based on the fact that women could not be combat soldiers. But the Pentagon opened up all military roles to women in 2015.

“While historical restrictions on women in the military may have justified past discrimination, men and women are now ‘similarly situated for purposes of a draft or registration for a draft,’” Judge Miller wrote in his ruling. “If there ever was a time to discuss ‘the place of women in the Armed Services,’ that time has passed.”

Miller said Congress has never fully examined whether men are physically better able to serve than women. In fact, he noted in a footnote, “the average woman could conceivably be better suited physically for some of today’s combat positions than the average man, depending on which skills the position required. Combat roles no longer uniformly require sheer size or muscle.”

Miller’s ruling was declaratory, and it did not specify any action that the government must take to comply. It comes as an 11-member advisory panel, the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service, is studying the draft system, considering whether it should continue and whether women should be included.

The case was brought by a men’s right group, and two men who argued an all-male draft violates the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection clause. Although there has not be a US military draft in 40 years, men who fail to register with the Selective Service System at their 18th birthday can be denied public benefits such as federal employment and student loans. Women cannot register for Selective Service.

The group, called the National Coalition For Men, cheered the ruling.

“We think it’s about time since women are allowed in combat,” Marc E. Angelucci, a lawyer for the National Coalition for Men, said. “If we have draft registration, both sexes should have to register. There’s really no more excuse to require only men to register.”

Many conservatives called the decision a logical result of the feminist campaign for equal rights, which in the #MeToo era has focused on combating workplace inequality.


Source

Thursday, September 6, 2018

Secretary of Education shuts down Obama's kangaroo courts

A judicial process that doesn’t allow the accused to cross-examine his accuser or reliably see the evidence against him is a civil libertarian’s nightmare. It traduces every principle of fairness and is blatantly un-American.

Yet Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is about to get savaged for replacing just such a process with something more in keeping with our longstanding legal norms.

The Education Department is preparing new rules that would roll back the monstrously unfair Obama-era requirements for how colleges handle sexual-assault and harassment allegations. It will be a significant advance for due process, which is almost as out of style on campus as free speech.

In one of its least defensible actions, the Obama administration used its Office for Civil Rights to impose its preferred procedures for handling sexual-assault cases on all the universities in the country that receive federal funds. It did it via a 19-page “Dear Colleague” letter, in the name of Title IX, the provision in federal law prohibiting sexual discrimination in education.

The process was terrible. It blew right by the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires public notice and comment before such rules go into effect. And the substance was worse. If the letter reads as if it was written by inflamed activists who had no interest in balanced proceedings, that’s because it was.

It required colleges to adopt a “preponderance of evidence” standard rather than a “clear and convincing” standard.

It more or less forbade colleges from allowing the cross-examination of accusers.

It adopted a remarkably broad definition of sexual harassment to include “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature.”

The administration also encouraged the use of a “single investigator-adjudicator system,” i.e., one person as investigator, judge and jury.

The Obama rules are medieval in the sense that they ignore central developments in Anglo-American justice that arose hundreds of years ago.

In their important book “The Campus Rape Frenzy,” KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor Jr. describe how the rules often played out: “Start with an alcohol-soaked set of facts that no state’s criminal law would consider sexual assault. Add an incomplete ‘investigation,’ unfair procedures, and a disciplinary panel uninterested in evidence of innocence. Stir in a de facto presumption of guilt based on misguided Obama administration dictates, ideological zeal, and fear of bad publicity.”

The result has, inevitably, been jaw-dropping miscarriages of justice. Everyone should want perpetrators of sexual assault to be punished — and in the criminal-justice system, not just by colleges — but elementary protections for the accused can’t be discarded in the process.

One reason the Obama rules were so lopsided is that they were crafted in an atmosphere of moral panic. It was assumed that there was a spiraling epidemic of sexual assault on campus. Taylor and Johnson note, to the contrary, that sexual assaults of female college students dropped by more than half between 1997 and 2013, and that young women in college are less likely to be assaulted than those who are not in college.

The Obama rules have been receiving a battering in the courts, where due process is still taken seriously.

A US district court judge wrote in a 2016 ruling against Brandeis University: “If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision. Put simply, a fair determination of the facts requires a fair process, not tilted to favor a particular outcome, and a fair and neutral fact-finder, not predisposed to reach a particular conclusion.”

This is the animating spirit behind the DeVos changes. They are still being formulated, but a New York Times report suggests that they will correct the worst excesses of the Obama rules and interject fairness into proceedings that were, shamefully, designed to lack it.


Source

Let's thank Betsy Devos: Betsy.Devos@ed.gov and let her know that what she is doing is fantastic and that we fully support it and her. The more of us they hear from the better so let's do it.

Thursday, March 29, 2018

Sexism in Sonoma County

One of my readers told me about these burglaries committed by east coast gangs are related to marijuana. The reason this is not posted on the Among Other Things blog is the following quote from Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner Tony Linegar. Who said the following quote: “Marijuana is so valuable men are willing to kill for it,” Source.

He told me he wrote to Tony Linegar and told him how he felt about that misandric statement. I'm about to do the same. Perhaps we should all let Mr. Linegar how we feel about his institutionalized misandry.

His email address is: Sonomaag@sonoma-county.org