When the sex offender is a woman

Anna Joy Walker

'Party Mom' Sentenced To 300 Days In Jail

(CBS13) MODESTO The so-called Grayson 'party mom' who had been accused of having sex with two teenagers and providing beer to several teens has been sentenced to 300-days in jail.

Anna Walker plead guilty to two charges of having sexual relations with minors in March. Under the plea agreement, Walker avoided prison.

Today a Stanislaus County judge ordered Walker to be immediately taken into custody. The judge also ordered her to four years of probation, counseling and to pay restitution.

Many parents were angry saying the sentence was much too light. "She is a molester. She is a child predator." one angry father told CBS13, "I said before, if this was a man do you think she would have got this leniency?" Under the charges Walker faced, she could have been sentenced to a maximum of seven years, eight months in prison.

And under the plea agreement because the victims were not under 14 years of age, Walker will not have to register herself as a sex offender. Another point that upset parents. "She's a sex offender in our eyes." said Tessa Garcia who child was one of the victims, "She did it once. She did it twice. She'd do it again."

Walker was arrested in January on allegations she bought alcohol for a group of teens during a party at her home.

Walker came to the attention of authorities after allegedly serving alcohol to a group of teens and forcing 13 of them to leave in a single SUV before her husband, an Atwater police officer, came home from work.

The driver, 18, crashed the SUV, injuring all its passengers.

Source: here

The matriarchy eats its own

DA: Woman accuses police chief of rape
Police chief denies rape accusations
staff reports Monday, April 23, 2007

Police Chief Bryan Smith denied allegations that he sexually assaulted a woman Saturday, saying the report was "false, vindictive and retaliatory."

"I have been falsely accused of sexual assault by a woman I formerly dated," Smith said during a press conference at his lawyer'>Smith said he learned about the accusations Saturday and is cooperating with the Texas Rangers' investigation into the matter.

"I have been falsely accused of sexual assault by a woman I formerly dated," Smith said during a press conference at his lawyer'>"I am confident that the investigation will exonerate me of the malicious accusation made against me," Smith said.

District Attorney Carlos Valdez said Monday his office is assisting with the investigation.

Valdez said a woman in her 30s said she was raped Saturday and went to an area hospital early that afternoon seeking medical care. He would not identify the woman or hospital but said standard procedures were performed to evaluate the woman's condition after she reported the incident to medical authorities.

Smith's lawyer, Tony Canales, said he believes the allegations stemmed from Smith's public proposal last Sunday to his girlfriend of five months, Patricia Zavodsky, at a Corpus Christi Hooks game.

Smith said he was taking a voluntary leave of absence until the matter is resolved and plans to use vacation days he has accrued.

City Manager Skip Noe said it is the city's normal procedure to wait until the results of an initial investigation before deciding if a city employee should be placed on paid or unpaid leave.
Noe said he learned of the accusation from Smith on Saturday afternoon after the police officer who took the report at the hospital called his supervisor who notified the chief.

Smith, 46, who has worked with Corpus Christi Police Department since 1981, was sworn in as chief in July after a nationwide search for a new chief.

Source: here

(Update: the grand jury has refused indict the chief for rape. I wonder how many regular Joe's get the same consideration from the matriarchy's grand jury?)

Just say no to the man tax

NCFM Opposes Harvard Economist's Sexist Man Tax

For Immediate Release

LOS ANGELES/EWORLDWIRE/May 16, 2007 --- The National Coalition of Free Men (NCFM), the oldest and largest men’s rights organization in the United States, vehemently opposes Harvard Professor Alberto Alesina’s recently-proposed man tax.(1)

"A man tax is as wrong as a Jew tax," says NCFM's Marc Angelucci. "They both violate the fundamental Constitutional right to equal protection by unfairly targeting a birth group for discriminatory treatment. "Even aside from equal protection, there is no justification for a man tax." Says Angelucci, men already pay more taxes than women, work more overtime, drive longer commutes, die younger and make 92 percent (2) of occupational deaths in order to provide for their families as they're expected to do.

"Men collect Alesina's garbage, clean his sewers and fix his streets so he can go to his ivory tower job and propose taxing men more." Alesina attempts to justify his "man tax" by citing the "pay gap," a mythical half-truth(3) that does not reflect male privilege but the female privilege of having more options than men. In his book, "Why Men Earn More," bestselling author Warren Farrell, Ph.D. demonstrates that: . At least 25 work-life choices lead to men earning more and women living more balanced lives . Women in surveys prioritized flexibility, fewer hours and shorter drives; men prioritized money . Never-married, childless women earn 17 percent more than their male counterparts . Women outearn men in at least 39 occupations, including science fields like aerospace engineering In what the New York Times called the "opt-out revolution," women are retaining and exercising their option to be primary parents and even seeking primary breadwinner men who allow them that choice. "Alesina's man tax is a hypocritical double-standard that promotes sexism, misandry and gender politics."

SOURCES 1. Alesina's proposal to tax males higher: http://www2.dse.unibo.it/ichino/taxgen12.pdf
2. Men make 92 percent of occupational deaths:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.t04.htm
3. Prof. June O'Neill, Ph.D., former director of Congressional Budget Office, refutes the significance of the "pay gap" in "The Gender Gap in Wages, circa 2000" (5/03), American Economic Review


HTML: http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/17021
PDF: http://www.eworldwire.com/pdf/17021.pdf
ONLINE NEWSROOM: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm
NEWSROOM RSS FEED: http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/xml/newsrooms/312078.xml
LOGO: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm

CONTACT:Marc Angelucci
National Coalition of Free Men
P.O. Box 41291 Los Angeles, CA 90041
(818) 907-9383

E-MAIL: marcangelucci@hotmail.com

http://www.ncfmla.org

KEYWORDS: National Coalition of Free Men, men's rights

SOURCE: National Coalition of Free Men

Source: here

Female organized crime

Woman Convicted In Scam To Bilk AG Of Bogus Child Support Paymentsby Bob Dunn, May 23, 2007, 09 26 am

One of 13 women – arrested in a scheme through which the Texas Attorney General’s Office allegedly was bilked of $40,000 in fraudulent child support payments – has been convicted of engaging in organized crime.

Debra Hodge, 42, of Richmond, was convicted of participating in a scheme through which the women are accused of forging their ex-husbands’ names to stolen checks, then sending the checks to the attorney general’s office.

As the women all were owed child support, the attorney general is alleged to have forwarded more than $40,000 in payments to them before realizing it was a scam. Law enforcement sources said in June 2006 that attorney general staff learned their office had been duped about close to $50,000 in checks bounced.

Assistant Fort Bend County District Attorney Mike Elliott, who prosecuted the Hodge case along with Assistant DA Kristen Moore, said Hodge opened a personal bank account and gave blank checks to another co-defendant, who then forged the signatures of fathers owing child support to members of the group of women.

The checks were then sent to the AG’s office, and payments were sent back to the co-defendants, Elliott said

According to Michael Elliott, Chief of the Economic Crimes Division, Hodge and eleven co-defendants participated in an illegal scheme to defraud the Texas Attorney General’s Office out of thousands of dollars from September 2005 through March 2006. Hodge opened at least one personal bank account and gave blank checks to another co-defendant who would then forge signatures as persons owing child support.

These checks were fraudulently written for the benefit of other co-defendants and submitted to the Attorney General’s Office, who would then forward the payments to those co-defendants — who were all actually owed child support.

When they received the payments from the attorney general’s office, the co-defendants gave a percentage of their payments back to Hodge and other defendants who had supplied the blank checks, according to information from the district attorney’s office

Hodge testified in her trial that the checks were stolen and forged without her knowledge, Elliott said. However, further testimony revealed that she had never reported the checks as stolen.
The jury, in visiting Judge Neil Caldwell’s 268th District Court, convicted her late last week.
“The citizens of Fort Bend County were clear that they would not tolerate criminals stealing money which is designated to support our children,” Elliott said, “ and even minor involvement in a scheme of this nature will not go unpunished.”

All 13 women involved in the alleged scam are from the Richmond or Rosenberg areas. Law enforcement sources said they believe scheme was hatched in September of 2005 by Tonya Jackson, 32, of the Rosenberg area, whose case still is pending.

A grand jury indicted the women in June 2006, and the Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Department began arresting them a short time later.

Once Jackson forged a check and found she would receive a payment from the AG’s office, “Tonya then went on to represent herself to other custodial parents as a worker for the Child Support Division and offered to help them in receiving child support payments,” according to sheriff’s report. “Once they received payment they would give Tonya half.”

According to sheriff’s reports, Jackson and others involved in the scheme opened bank accounts “for the sole purpose of issuing child support payments. The temporary checks issued from accounts with minimum deposits were later closed due to issuance of bad checks. Payments were also issued from accounts that were closed and/or had insufficient funds in the account.”
One law enforcement source said it’s possible to buy blank checks and software at a Wal-Mart store that will allow someone to print sequential checks with a routing number and account number of the buyer’s choice.

Source: here

This is happening in the U.K. but it could happen anywhere

Dehra Dowden;would you trust the look on this mug?


Barry Stack;financially raped


Warning to unmarried couples over home rights
By JAMES MILLS

Last updated at 23:43pm on 25th April 2007

Unmarried couples were warned yesterday of the financial pitfalls of buying property together after a landmark ruling by the House of Lords.

They were urged to draw up legal agreements to avoid costly legal battles if they break up - as joint ownership is not enough to ensure a simple 50/50 split of the property.

This is the same Law Lords that declared pre-nups void,well I guess only for protecting men and I'm sure they will find a way to fuck men on this too.

The warnings came as five Law Lords ruled that Barry Stack, a 51-year-old father-of-four, was not entitled to an equal share of the family home he had shared with Dehra Dowden, his partner of more than 20 years and mother of his children.

The Lords concluded that Miss Dowden, 49 - who earns twice as much as Mr Stack as an electrical engineer - deserved a larger slice because she had contributed more money to the purchase.

I'm sure if he made more money than her she would still get the larger size because of "all that she did for his career" and "the sacrifices she made" or some other rubbish.

Mr Stack now faces a crippling bill of up to £100,000 after losing his challenge against an earlier ruling that gave Miss Dowden a 65 per cent share of their £750,000 home.

The case could have consequences for millions of others as increasing numbers of couples buy homes and bring up families without getting married.

Partners who stay at home to look after the children, and therefore do not contribute as much financially, could also be forced into legal disputes over their property rights.

The case will serve as a further warning to the growing numbers of friends and relatives who buy property together.

According to the last census in 2001, one in six couples who live together are unmarried - a rise of 67 per cent in ten years. This figure is expected to rise to one in four by 2031.

But there are no clear laws setting out how assets should be split between such couples if their relationships break down as divorce laws do not apply.

In yesterday's judgement, Baroness Hale urged unmarried couples to sign 'declarations of trust' - making their shares in the property clear - in order to avoid expensive legal wrangles.

This is probably the cunt who ruining everything for men in the U.K.

She said: 'In family disputes, strong feelings are aroused when couples split up.

'These often lead the parties, honestly but mistakenly, to reinterpret the past in self-exculpatory or vengeful terms.

'They also lead people to spend far more on the legal battle than is warranted by the sums actually at stake.'

Baroness Hale also expressed concern that too many couples believed the myth of common law marriage, which wrongly assumes that co-habiting couples enjoy the same rights as married couples if they stay together long enough.

Lord Hope added that determining property rights in such cases had 'become an increasingly pressing social problem.'

William Selby-Lowndes, an expert on co-habitation family law, said: 'This is a warning for co-habiting couples that if they do not work out how they own any property together, it can be a very expensive and disappointing exercise when they separate.'

Mr Stack and Miss Dowden's relationship began in 1975 when they were both in their late teens.

They moved in together in 1983 when Miss Dowden bought a house in her name in Kensal Green, North London, for £30,000. She put down a deposit of £8,000 and secured a mortgage for £22,000.

Mr Stack claims that he made a contribution to the deposit which Miss Dowden disputes.

She also claims that he did not want his name on the deeds because 'he did not want the responsibility of the mortgage or household debts and running costs.'

Their four children were born between 1987 and 1991, during which time Mr Stack took a £24,000-a-year building job with a local council, where he is still employed. Miss Bowden earns £42,000 a year as an electrical engineer.

They used childminders and nannies to look after the children.

In 1993 the couple bought a home in both their names in nearby Willesden Green for £190,000. They used £66,000 profits from the sale of their previous home, a £65,000 mortgage and £59,000 of savings.

Miss Dowden repaid £38,000 of the loan while Mr Stack repaid the remaining £27,000.

When they split in 2002, a county court ruled that Mr Stack should get a 50 per cent share of the property. Miss Dowden took the case to the Appeal Court and won a 65 per cent share - £112,000 more than she was previously awarded.

Mr Stack went on to appeal to the House of Lords. During a four-day hearing in February, Miss Dowden said: 'Barry says £30,000 came from our joint savings. This is not true. We did not have a joint bank account.

'All the money was mine. I earned it from working hard at my job.'

Source:here

Another false accuser

Sharon Owers

Woman 'cried rape to justify lover's attack on ex-boyfriend'Last updated at 00:51am on 12th May 2007

A woman falsely accused an ex-boyfriend of rape after her current partner beat him up, a court heard yesterday.

Sharon Owers told police that keen yachtsman Chris Sullivan had raped her on her birthday on a pontoon at Swanwick Marina, near Southampton.

However, she made the allegation only when she and boyfriend Craig Abernethy were being interviewed over a frenzied attack on Mr Sullivan.

A jury heard that CCTV footage and evidence did not back up the claim of rape and Mr Sullivan had a watertight alibi for the night in question.

Nevertheless, three days after that date Abernethy stormed aboard Mr Sullivan's boat and attacked him with a piece wood, Portsmouth Crown Court heard.

Mr Sullivan was initially held for a day in police cells after the 45-year- old Owers made the false rape allegations.

However, after police investigated further, Owers was charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Stuart Ellacott, prosecuting, said that Owers may have invented the rape to get back at Mr Sullivan.

He said: "On the evidence gathered, and more crucially on CCTV, apart from a lady enjoying a party and having too much to drink, all that happened was Owers circuited around the boatyard, sat down and lay on the pontoon - nothing more than that.

"For whatever reason - a grievance going back a year or two, I know not - she made up an allegation of rape against this man."

The court heard that on June 21 last year, Mr Sullivan was on his boat in Woolston, Southampton, when Abernethy attacked him with a plank.

When Mr Sullivan reported the attack to the police, officers interviewed Abernethy and Owers, and the allegation of rape was made.

Owers claimed she left a pub in Swanwick at about 12.30am on June 18 and was raped by Mr Sullivan on a pontoon at the nearby marina.

In a video interview with police, Owers said: "I did not feel anything, I did not want to see anything, but I know he had sex with me."

But on the night in question several witnesses said Mr Sullivan was at the boatyard until the time Owers said the rape occurred.

The court heard Mr Sullivan told police that his 'volatile' two-year relationship with Owers had ended in 2004.

In a statement read to the jury, he said she was a heavy drinker and a 'free spirit' who would strip naked when she became drunk.

He said he broke all contact with her in 2005 when he realised she was seeing Abernethy and he had erased her mobile number from his phone.

Mr Sullivan said he felt 'sick' when he was arrested on suspicion of rape.

Owers, of Swanwick, denies one charge of intending to pervert the course of justice.

The case continues.

Source: here

Counterattack

You guys are really helping out Angry Harry and that is great. However we must mount an offense to win as well that is why we are going to put Feministring and NYMOM as "worst blog of all time" and "most obnoxious blogger",respectively. So lets go after them.

http://www.bloggerschoiceawards.com/blogs/show/15741

http://www.bloggerschoiceawards.com/blogs/show/15742