Showing posts with label boycott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boycott. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Retaliation
It appears that feminists have declared war on heavy metal. Fuck that,I say we return the favor that is why we are declaring war on female groups such as Fifth Harmony. Fifth Harmony is a feminist group,they even say so. Boycott Fifth Harmony,don't buy their songs,don't go to their concerts just economically starve them. We will do this to other girl groups too. So unless feminists leave heavy metal alone their sisters will also suffer. If they don't ease up on heavy metal gate we launch Fifth Harmony gate. The ball is in your court,feminists. What is it going to be.
Monday, February 23, 2015
Fuck you Sarah Silverman apologize T-Mobile
Apologize for, or Remove bigoted, Sarah Silverman, "Sorry it's a boy" Commercial.
To whom it may concern,
People who have contacted T-Mobile with complaints about the recent Sarah Silverman, "sorry it's a boy" Super Bowl commercial due to it's bigoted message were replied to from the head office with condescending emails containing messages that basically amounted to a "sorry you didn't see the humor in our commercial".
You can see an example of one of the condescending emails the company sent in the screenshot attached to this petition, This is totally unacceptable and demonstrates the attitude of a company that has no respect whatsoever for the consumers nor for baby boys and mothers of boys.
We as consumers and potential consumers will not tolerate these sort of insulting messages and continue to support T-Mobile products and as such we will be boycotting your products until an official apology or the removal of this commercial is completed. For a company that claims to pride itself on tolerance of all groups and genders this commercial sends a contrary message.
Source
To whom it may concern,
People who have contacted T-Mobile with complaints about the recent Sarah Silverman, "sorry it's a boy" Super Bowl commercial due to it's bigoted message were replied to from the head office with condescending emails containing messages that basically amounted to a "sorry you didn't see the humor in our commercial".
You can see an example of one of the condescending emails the company sent in the screenshot attached to this petition, This is totally unacceptable and demonstrates the attitude of a company that has no respect whatsoever for the consumers nor for baby boys and mothers of boys.
We as consumers and potential consumers will not tolerate these sort of insulting messages and continue to support T-Mobile products and as such we will be boycotting your products until an official apology or the removal of this commercial is completed. For a company that claims to pride itself on tolerance of all groups and genders this commercial sends a contrary message.
Source
Monday, February 17, 2014
Protest misandric bill SB 967
Law proposal will increase access to sexual assault justice
STATE ISSUES: Proposed legislation would make it easier for victims of sexual assault to access the support they need and bring their attackers to justice.
By Senior Editorial Board | Staff
Last Updated February 14, 2014
The prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses across the country has reached the point where the need for sweeping institutional reform is undeniable. Exacerbated by notions of assumed consent in modern ‘hookup culture,’ abundant drug and alcohol use, misunderstandings and malevolence, sexual assault — and university and government authorities’ failure to properly respond to it — has become an epidemic. Legislation proposed by three Sacramento lawmakers on Monday represents a solvent institutional response to the problem, as it seeks to tighten and standardize sexual assault policies across California colleges and make those policies more survivor-centered.
The proposed law — SB 967 — improves upon the efforts of even the most progressive universities, like the UC system, to address sexual assault. By their very nature, sexual assault cases are difficult to prosecute. They are often characterized by a lack of physical evidence since the crimes tend to take place in private and are sometimes not reported until some time after the fact. For all California colleges, SB 967 would establish a “preponderance of the evidence standard in the determination of disciplinary action,” meaning courts would give extra consideration to incomplete or inconclusive evidence in sexual assault cases. In this way, the benefit of the doubt would be given to the survivors, encouraging them to speak out and help ensure that more perpetrators of sexual assault are brought to justice.
But the law does more than simply aim to increase the perpetrated-to-prosecuted rate — it works to spark a necessary cultural shift in what it means to engage in consensual sexual activity. Though any policy is incapable of fully addressing the crux of the sexual assault problem, the proposal’s requirement that defendants in a sexual assault case demonstrate they obtained verbal “affirmative consent” before engaging in sexual activity makes SB 967 a step in the right direction. By setting clearer parameters and removing ambiguity around consent, this mandate places responsibility for consent on both parties and thus makes cases of assault easier to prosecute.
Tough action against perpetrators of sexual assault, and stringent, comprehensive policy standards on college campuses where many sexual assaults occur are necessary to stem this national epidemic. The proposals outlined in SB 967 represent the best policy solution to the problem of sexual assault at California schools thus far, and should be adopted by the California legislature. Although in most cases this mandate will be a simple inconvenience, it is necessary to shift the paradigm away from assumed notions of consent under which sexual assault have proliferated.
Source
This is going to be California's answer to the Department of Justice's "dear colleague" directive which stripped male students of their rights on University and College campuses when it came to false rape accusations. SB 967 is about one thing and one thing only and that is get men. This is so bad no commenters are siding with this bill.
Let's oppose this bill. If you live in California you can contact your Legislators and the Governor:
Assembly:click here
Find your Representatives and Senators
Senate: click here
Governor Jerry Brown: Governor's website
Email the Governor
If you don't live in California contact the legislative speakers and Governor, tell them that you don't support SB 967 and that you don't want to spend your money to benefit a state that passed SB 967 or similiar legislation. It's time to end the anti-male sexism.
(UPDATE: The current status of SB 967 as of 2-18-14)
CURRENT BILL STATUS
MEASURE : S.B. No. 967
AUTHOR(S): De León and Jackson (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member
Lowenthal) (Coauthors: Senators Beall, Evans, Galgiani,
Pavley, and Torres) (Coauthors: Assembly Members
Gonzalez and Williams).
TOPIC : Student safety: sexual assault.
HOUSE LOCATION : SEN
TYPE OF BILL :
Active
Non-Urgency
Non-Appropriations
Majority Vote Required
State-Mandated Local Program
Fiscal
Non-Tax Levy
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 02/11/2014
LAST HIST. ACTION : From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
TITLE : An act to add Section 67386 to the Education Code,
relating to student safety.
Source
Let's keep an eye on this one,dudes. Even if you don't live in California this could spread to your state. The best way to get rid of SB 967 and Dear Colleague is to oppose them. The more of us that do that the better our chances are of prevailing over them.
STATE ISSUES: Proposed legislation would make it easier for victims of sexual assault to access the support they need and bring their attackers to justice.
By Senior Editorial Board | Staff
Last Updated February 14, 2014
The prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses across the country has reached the point where the need for sweeping institutional reform is undeniable. Exacerbated by notions of assumed consent in modern ‘hookup culture,’ abundant drug and alcohol use, misunderstandings and malevolence, sexual assault — and university and government authorities’ failure to properly respond to it — has become an epidemic. Legislation proposed by three Sacramento lawmakers on Monday represents a solvent institutional response to the problem, as it seeks to tighten and standardize sexual assault policies across California colleges and make those policies more survivor-centered.
The proposed law — SB 967 — improves upon the efforts of even the most progressive universities, like the UC system, to address sexual assault. By their very nature, sexual assault cases are difficult to prosecute. They are often characterized by a lack of physical evidence since the crimes tend to take place in private and are sometimes not reported until some time after the fact. For all California colleges, SB 967 would establish a “preponderance of the evidence standard in the determination of disciplinary action,” meaning courts would give extra consideration to incomplete or inconclusive evidence in sexual assault cases. In this way, the benefit of the doubt would be given to the survivors, encouraging them to speak out and help ensure that more perpetrators of sexual assault are brought to justice.
But the law does more than simply aim to increase the perpetrated-to-prosecuted rate — it works to spark a necessary cultural shift in what it means to engage in consensual sexual activity. Though any policy is incapable of fully addressing the crux of the sexual assault problem, the proposal’s requirement that defendants in a sexual assault case demonstrate they obtained verbal “affirmative consent” before engaging in sexual activity makes SB 967 a step in the right direction. By setting clearer parameters and removing ambiguity around consent, this mandate places responsibility for consent on both parties and thus makes cases of assault easier to prosecute.
Tough action against perpetrators of sexual assault, and stringent, comprehensive policy standards on college campuses where many sexual assaults occur are necessary to stem this national epidemic. The proposals outlined in SB 967 represent the best policy solution to the problem of sexual assault at California schools thus far, and should be adopted by the California legislature. Although in most cases this mandate will be a simple inconvenience, it is necessary to shift the paradigm away from assumed notions of consent under which sexual assault have proliferated.
Source
This is going to be California's answer to the Department of Justice's "dear colleague" directive which stripped male students of their rights on University and College campuses when it came to false rape accusations. SB 967 is about one thing and one thing only and that is get men. This is so bad no commenters are siding with this bill.
Let's oppose this bill. If you live in California you can contact your Legislators and the Governor:
Assembly:click here
Find your Representatives and Senators
Senate: click here
Governor Jerry Brown: Governor's website
Email the Governor
If you don't live in California contact the legislative speakers and Governor, tell them that you don't support SB 967 and that you don't want to spend your money to benefit a state that passed SB 967 or similiar legislation. It's time to end the anti-male sexism.
(UPDATE: The current status of SB 967 as of 2-18-14)
CURRENT BILL STATUS
MEASURE : S.B. No. 967
AUTHOR(S): De León and Jackson (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member
Lowenthal) (Coauthors: Senators Beall, Evans, Galgiani,
Pavley, and Torres) (Coauthors: Assembly Members
Gonzalez and Williams).
TOPIC : Student safety: sexual assault.
HOUSE LOCATION : SEN
TYPE OF BILL :
Active
Non-Urgency
Non-Appropriations
Majority Vote Required
State-Mandated Local Program
Fiscal
Non-Tax Levy
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 02/11/2014
LAST HIST. ACTION : From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
TITLE : An act to add Section 67386 to the Education Code,
relating to student safety.
Source
Let's keep an eye on this one,dudes. Even if you don't live in California this could spread to your state. The best way to get rid of SB 967 and Dear Colleague is to oppose them. The more of us that do that the better our chances are of prevailing over them.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Boycott Kia for their misandric commercial
Kia Motors seems to think they will sell more cars to women if their ads include a little female-on-male abuse. In the following ad they've made the woman a human-looking robot. We think it's offensive, whether she's a robot or not.
Please contact Kia Motors today. Use whichever link is the most convenient.
Tell them you won't be buying any of their cars as long as they try to sell them with "humorous violence."
•Kia Motors: click here
•Kia on Facebook: click here
•Kia on Twitter: click here
On behalf of every victim of violence, thank you.
teri
Teri Stoddard, Program Director
Stop Abusive and Violent Environments
www.saveservices.org
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Boycott the runoff election
My California correspondent weighs in:
A few weeks ago I told everyone about the elections in district 32 California state senate race which was held on March 12. The results reveal that there was no clear winner so there will be a runoff election on May 14. I have contacted the candidates in the race,Paul Leon and Norma Torres. I have received no reply. Here is that letter:
I was just reading at the Daily Bulletin Website about the election results: http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_22777447/torres-leon-grab-early-leads-state-senate-race?source=rss
I believe I may be able to shine some light on what happened: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2013/03/boycott-vote.html
Now will you take our concerns seriously. If you have a feminist advisor that is telling you to ignore us you are getting some very bad advice.
Want our votes? Answer my questions. Here is the original letter:
I am a men's rights activist or MRA and I advocate for men's issues and concerns. I was just at your website and I was wondering where you stand on issues that effect men. For instance:
1. When men and women are arrested for the same crime the man receives a harsher sentence than the woman or if she has teamed up with a man she can play the victim and testify against him even though they are equals. Not only that but when the death penalty is on the table women are spared the death penalty while men are not. Also women's prisons are much nicer than men's prisons. Does this sound fair to you? It doesn't to us.
2. When it comes to anti-male laws such as VAWA only men are arrested and prosecuted while female batterers go free,also male victims are ignored. Does this sound fair to you? It doesn't to us.
VAWA does occur at the state level as the following video will demonstrate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-SC0a1_Vjs
I'm sure while campaigning you've met a lot of new people. Have you met Brian Banks:
http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/search?q=brian+banks
There are lots of other California men in prison based on some trumped up rape charge and because of rape shield laws they are unable to ferret out the true nature of their accusers.
If elected will you address and correct these inequalities and injustices men face?
Here are some men's rights sites:
http://ncfm.org/
http://www.mediaradar.org/
http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/
http://news.mensactivism.org/
http://www.avoiceformen.com/
http://www.cotwa.info/
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
Men's Rights Activist,Registered Voter
and Concerned Citizen
Here is their contact information: Paul Leon: www.Leonforsenate.com Norma Torres: www.normatorres.com
Unless they respond I'm not voting and I hope others join me.
I don't blame you,bro. I would sit this one out just you advocated last time. I certainly wouldn't cast a ballot for misandric candidates and I hope others in that district feel the same way.
A few weeks ago I told everyone about the elections in district 32 California state senate race which was held on March 12. The results reveal that there was no clear winner so there will be a runoff election on May 14. I have contacted the candidates in the race,Paul Leon and Norma Torres. I have received no reply. Here is that letter:
I was just reading at the Daily Bulletin Website about the election results: http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_22777447/torres-leon-grab-early-leads-state-senate-race?source=rss
I believe I may be able to shine some light on what happened: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2013/03/boycott-vote.html
Now will you take our concerns seriously. If you have a feminist advisor that is telling you to ignore us you are getting some very bad advice.
Want our votes? Answer my questions. Here is the original letter:
I am a men's rights activist or MRA and I advocate for men's issues and concerns. I was just at your website and I was wondering where you stand on issues that effect men. For instance:
1. When men and women are arrested for the same crime the man receives a harsher sentence than the woman or if she has teamed up with a man she can play the victim and testify against him even though they are equals. Not only that but when the death penalty is on the table women are spared the death penalty while men are not. Also women's prisons are much nicer than men's prisons. Does this sound fair to you? It doesn't to us.
2. When it comes to anti-male laws such as VAWA only men are arrested and prosecuted while female batterers go free,also male victims are ignored. Does this sound fair to you? It doesn't to us.
VAWA does occur at the state level as the following video will demonstrate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-SC0a1_Vjs
I'm sure while campaigning you've met a lot of new people. Have you met Brian Banks:
http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/search?q=brian+banks
There are lots of other California men in prison based on some trumped up rape charge and because of rape shield laws they are unable to ferret out the true nature of their accusers.
If elected will you address and correct these inequalities and injustices men face?
Here are some men's rights sites:
http://ncfm.org/
http://www.mediaradar.org/
http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/
http://news.mensactivism.org/
http://www.avoiceformen.com/
http://www.cotwa.info/
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
Men's Rights Activist,Registered Voter
and Concerned Citizen
Here is their contact information: Paul Leon: www.Leonforsenate.com Norma Torres: www.normatorres.com
Unless they respond I'm not voting and I hope others join me.
I don't blame you,bro. I would sit this one out just you advocated last time. I certainly wouldn't cast a ballot for misandric candidates and I hope others in that district feel the same way.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Boycott Godiva Inc.
I read an article on Godiva chocolate at A Voice For Men and after reading it I'm calling on a boycott of all Godiva chocolate products. There are practicing misandry by excluding men who better society. This Valentine's Day do not buy Godiva products only buy from their competitors. You can also let James A. Goldman,CEO of Godiva Inc. know that you will no longer be buying products from Godiva Inc. His email address is ceo@godiva.com. Don't bother with writing some flunkie in "letters" department when we can write the head guy. Just say "no" to Godiva Inc.
Monday, November 12, 2012
Vladek Filler freed;boycott suspended
From A Voice For Men:
While few details are in, AVfM has just been advised that Vladek Filler is out of jail and has returned home to be with his two children and the rest of his family. We will post an update with more details when more information is available.
Source:click here
Also there is this:
Tonight on AVFM News and Activism we will dedicate the guest portion of our show to covering current developments in the Vladek Filler case. Joining us will be Paul Elam and John the Other to talk about the abhorrent legal maneuverings of J. Scott Davis and what can only be described as an all encompassing ring of corruption in the family law justice system in the state of Maine. Now, more than ever, aggressive activism is needed to expose and put to an end the destructive reign of Mary Kellett and the band of cronies that make up the press and legal establishment in that state.
Please call in and voice your support for this effort and share your thoughts.
The show airs live on November 6trh, at 8:00 Central Time, US, which is 2:00 a.m. November 7th in London and 11:00 a.m. November 7th in Brisbane. If you have not yet requested membership in the Stickcam Room, you can do so through the link below.
Source:click here
Great news Vladek Filler has been freed. I guess we can ease up on the boycott as long as there is no further persecution of Vladek Filler. As long as he is allowed to hold public officials who abuse the offices they hold accountable and not be persecuted for doing so. So as long as Vladek Filler is allowed to testify and leave Maine unfettered then there is no problem. If the games against Vladek Filler continue I will reinstate the boycott but until then enjoy some Maine lobster.
While few details are in, AVfM has just been advised that Vladek Filler is out of jail and has returned home to be with his two children and the rest of his family. We will post an update with more details when more information is available.
Source:click here
Also there is this:
Tonight on AVFM News and Activism we will dedicate the guest portion of our show to covering current developments in the Vladek Filler case. Joining us will be Paul Elam and John the Other to talk about the abhorrent legal maneuverings of J. Scott Davis and what can only be described as an all encompassing ring of corruption in the family law justice system in the state of Maine. Now, more than ever, aggressive activism is needed to expose and put to an end the destructive reign of Mary Kellett and the band of cronies that make up the press and legal establishment in that state.
Please call in and voice your support for this effort and share your thoughts.
The show airs live on November 6trh, at 8:00 Central Time, US, which is 2:00 a.m. November 7th in London and 11:00 a.m. November 7th in Brisbane. If you have not yet requested membership in the Stickcam Room, you can do so through the link below.
Source:click here
Great news Vladek Filler has been freed. I guess we can ease up on the boycott as long as there is no further persecution of Vladek Filler. As long as he is allowed to hold public officials who abuse the offices they hold accountable and not be persecuted for doing so. So as long as Vladek Filler is allowed to testify and leave Maine unfettered then there is no problem. If the games against Vladek Filler continue I will reinstate the boycott but until then enjoy some Maine lobster.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Boycott all Maine products
I'm calling for a boycott of all Maine products and services. Whether it is produce.lobster,whatever we will not buy those products. Likewise we will not use services headquartered in Maine such as travel services. We will not contribute to increasing Maine's economy in anyway. DA Carletta Bassano has wrongfully imprisoned Vladek Filler to prevent him from testifying against the ADA,Mary N. Kellett, who knowing persecuted him when she knew for a fact he was innocent of the charges against him,at her disciplinary hearing. So while Vladek Filler is probably fighting other prisoners bribed to cause him trouble Mary N. Kellett is on vacation in parts unknown,living it up. So from here on there is a total boycott on all Maine products and services and hopefully a large depletion of the Maine economy. We will not end this boycott until Vladek Filler is released and giving immunity from further persecution in this case and all those who persecuted him brought to justice and justly incarcerated for a long time. It comes down to this: free an innocent man and give him the justice that is long overdue or watch the money in the economy deplete like the water draining from a bathtub. It's Maine's choice.
Let's also let the Maine Chamber of Commerce,this is the only way to send them email and Visit Maine,the Maine website for travel to that state know about our boycott.
Let's also let the Maine Chamber of Commerce,this is the only way to send them email and Visit Maine,the Maine website for travel to that state know about our boycott.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Boycott Pepsi-UPDATE
We've all seen the misandric commercials put out by Pepsi to sell their products even at one point glamorizing female-on-male domestic violence. I find the way they are advertising their product to be offensive and wrote them to tell them. That is why I am joining Bob Allen's boycott of Pepsi. Apparently the misandric head honchos of Pepsi thinks misandry is acceptable. Let's tell them otherwise.
Contact Pepsi
To contact the guy who made the commercial and tell him what you think contact him here: bebosley@yahoo.com His name is Brad Bosley
Put in the subject line: Super Bowl Pepsi Max Ad
Contact Pepsi
To contact the guy who made the commercial and tell him what you think contact him here: bebosley@yahoo.com His name is Brad Bosley
Put in the subject line: Super Bowl Pepsi Max Ad
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Boycott Rona
Rona is a competitor of Home Depot's in Canada. Recently Rona is giving money to women's organizations in Canada,particularly women's shelters. We have seen that women's organizations in Canada are very far from oppressed in fact they are downright nasty,fascistic and vicious. Weak is something they are not. So when Canadian men buy from Rona they are contributing to their own destruction. What we want to do is boycott Rona,don't buy from them and don't buy from anyone associated with them. Hopefully Rona will learn that midandry is no way to do business. Let's tell Robert Dutton,President and CEO:
robert.dutton@rona.ca
Tell them that you won't buy from them until they end the sexist practice of donating to women's shelters that deny men. Tell them that you will tell other people not to buy from them and that you will do this until they end their sexist practices. Remind them this is the same Robert Dutton that believes in ethics in management. Let's see what he has to say.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
More on Volkswagen
It seems that after writing the CEO I get a response from Volkswagen with a link to their customer care survey that may get more prompt attention from them. They inform me the U.S. office handles complaints in the USA. Their anti-male commercial is still on the air and we need to let them know that we won't take it. The next step would be to boycott all Volkswagen products. When filling out the survey state your issue is unresolved,you are very dissatisfied, tell them their misandry won't be tolerated and that you won't be buying Volkswagens again.
If you are prompted for a UserName and Password, please enter:
UserName: 72410
Password: 4DEDA9DB
If you are prompted for a UserName and Password, please enter:
UserName: 72410
Password: 4DEDA9DB
Friday, September 26, 2008
Boycott Macy's
Boycott Macy's for their anti male sexism in sponsering Respect rings. It appears that Macy's believes that domestic violence in done by men against women and never the other way around and to prove it they are selling Respect rings that symbolize their anti male sexism. I'm joining in with Marc Rudov in boycotting Macy's. If you are not a fan of what Macy's is doing you can send your letters of outrage to:
Terry Lundgren,CEO of Macy's
terry.lundgren@macys.com
Holly Thomas,Macy's press secretary
holly.thomas@macys.com
Let Macy's know their anti male sexism is neither appreciated nor condoned.
To see the propaganda put out for these Respect rings click here
If you click on this link you will see Macy's anti male sexism.
Terry Lundgren,CEO of Macy's
terry.lundgren@macys.com
Holly Thomas,Macy's press secretary
holly.thomas@macys.com
Let Macy's know their anti male sexism is neither appreciated nor condoned.
To see the propaganda put out for these Respect rings click here
If you click on this link you will see Macy's anti male sexism.
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Boycott the movie "Sex and the City"
I'm joining in with Marc Rudov in boycotting the movie "Sex in the City" which is very misandric in nature. This is a chick flick that is as revolting as the series itself. They did a survey and found only 22% of men would come to see this movie and I believe we know which segment of the population they would be comprised of (gay and or retarded,just like my detractors) and I believe it was Margret Hoover on O'Reilly that said that these "men" would be hitting on the women there and I disagree because they are gay. Speaking of O'Reilly,one time on his show he had some woman who wrote a book about being an escort and O'Reilly came off like a mother hen and moralizing about it. O'Reilly the mangina. Men can join together in this boycott and send a message to Hollywood that we won't take it anymore.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)