Canada becomes even more pussywhipped than it already is

Just when you thought Canada couldn't get even more pussy whipped than it already is they manage to go over the top. Freedoms are dead in Canada. A lot of people have compared the United States to Canada and said there is little difference between the two countries. I hope this video dispels that notion and brings to light the sharp contrasts between the two countries. If the so-called "conservatives" are on board with this legislation then the average conservative Canadian is fucked. A lot of Canadians don't care about this. They don't care about their rights. Although I sure they are a small number of Canadians who do care they will probably flow to the United States as refugees to avoid Trudeau's iron fisted laws. Before I conclude I would like to touch on something Lucian said and that is since it is illegal to oppress gender expression does that mean that I can act masculine and if feminists oppress my expressing myself do they go to jail for oppressing me and the way I express myself? Not likely. More feminist/liberal hypocrisy.

Which brings us to the new Canadian national anthem. Come on kids sing along okay:

Men are taught to die for women in the Anglosphere

Chivalry: A learned deathwish
April 25, 2016 By Paul Elam 79 Comments

Just after midnight last Friday, April 22, 2016, and a scant 4 or 5 miles from where I am sitting, 19-year-old Jason Cisneros stopped by his best friend Ivania’s apartment to see her. When he arrived, he heard a commotion near where he parked.

He sent a text to Ivania inside, saying, “’I’m outside. There’s a lady honking, and this guy wants to hit her. He wants to kill her.”

Jason then approached the woman’s car to intervene. Just a moment later, he lay dying on the street, with two gunshot wounds.

The news coverage on this, what little it will get, will paint a simple picture. A brave young man heard a woman in distress — a woman he did not even know — and lost his life trying to protect her.

Of course, the real story is not nearly so simple. What made this young man walk into the line of fire? Was it heroics? Why didn’t he just call the police? Why did he feel the pull toward intervening in the troubles of a female stranger?

Why have men like this, rushing in and dying to protect women they don’t even know, become their own crime statistic?

This is a sad event that illustrates so much of what is wrong with men’s story in the modern age.

With the narrative about men’s place in the world casting them in the role of a protective vassal, we have developed the expectation that this is what men ought to be.

Undoubtedly the news coverage will play this out as a senseless tragedy. Accordingly, most will eventually take refuge in the fanciful idea that Jason Cisneros died a hero.

The members of society, by and large, who read this story and watch the news video, will end up on a similar trajectory, toward glorifying the self-sacrifice.

They will not conclude that this was a young man who was set up, duped into putting his neck on the chopping block by a history and force he never had a chance to grow up to understand.

His parents will take solace in the idea that their son died doing something noble. His friend will apply a similar salve to her grief. Few, if any, will question the wisdom of his choice or the factors that drove him to make it.

Fewer still will wonder about the character of the woman he was trying to save, even though it was evident that she was in a relationship with a murderous thug, that her chickens had come home to roost that night, and that she wanted someone to rescue her at any cost.

Jason Cisneros
Jason Cisneros
Jason Cisneros died trying to protect a woman he did not know, who it turns out may have been no more worthy of protection than the man who killed him.

Our society will interpret his death as heroics, and thus teach more young men that this insanity is the model of manhood they should emulate.

We will deny our young men the truth. Jason’s impulse to rescue the damsel in distress is a dysfunctional mandate passed down from generation to generation living by a narrative that sees his life as easily disposable.

Was Jason a good man? Most probably he was, though I am loathe to use that term lightly anymore. There is too much pointless sacrifice that comes with it.

The small amount of information that I have indicates that he came from a loving, supportive and close-knit family. And he was, after all, doing what he believed to be the right thing.

I can’t even imagine the sense of loss his family feels right now. Parents burying a child instead of the reverse is a hugely painful deviation from the natural order.

But for the sake of preventing more funerals, it is important to push aside the misguided chivalry and false heroism of this event and recognize that Jason’s death is one of countless, pointless sacrifices that never should have happened.

There is nothing to glorify here. Not the death of a beloved son. Not the ill-fated choices of young women who are sexually excited by criminality and violence.

And not the false code of male honor inflicted on young men from the shadows of a warped social consciousness.

There is a lesson here for parents and for anyone else who has a young man in their lives whom they love.

Please ask yourself, if your son or other loved one encountered the same situation as Jason, what would they do? Would they intervene? If they did, is that what you would want them to do?

Would it make you proud? If it would, are you willing to bury them for the sake of that pride?

If you would not want your son to die like Jason Cisneros died, have you told him? Have you made it clear to him that dying for a stranger is not your idea of manhood?

Have the lessons from your family been about protecting his loved ones, protecting himself, or about protecting anyone at his own expense?

You know, this stuff matters. Today’s young men get copious amounts of messaging about manhood, most of it instructing them to accept their disposability by calling it a badge of honor.

Young men face a barrage of social messages to “man up” and be a “real man” and other shaming, exploitive instructions.

It even comes from the government. We see it in the “It’s On Us” anti-sexual assault campaign, which includes President Obama and Vice-President Joe Biden, along with stars like Common, Mike Roe, and others, telling young men that it is on them to intervene.

Just like Jason Cisneros did.

Please watch the “It’s On Us” video and think about the price Jason paid for making sure it was on him.

Doing that might make you stop to consider if you want to manipulate your son or another beloved man into playing unarmed and unpaid bodyguard, ever at the disposal of strangers.

And while you’re at it, you might ask yourself something else. Do you have any reason to think Common would risk his life for a stranger?

Do you think Joe Biden cares about your son — or the women’s vote?

When I look at what Jason’s story turned into, all I see is a devastated family, a grieving friend, and a decent young man with a life cut short on behalf of someone who in no way warranted that kind of sacrifice – not that any stranger ever does.

Perhaps there is a better social message we can send all people, young and old. It’s on you.

It’s on you to forge the ability to protect yourself. It’s on you to make sound decisions about people with whom you choose to get involved.

It is not the responsibility of strangers, and it is not a burden for another class of human beings to bear.

No one outside you, your family and the police have any obligation to take risks for your safety. If women don’t know this, the parents of young men certainly should.

Source

Warren Farrell weighed in on male disposibility in his book The Myth Of Male Power,how it reduces men to a lesser status than women and it makes men miscategorize their slavery as something heroic. This is misandry. This has to stop.

AVFM versus Roosh

If you've been following the manosphere as of late there is a feud between Dean Esmay of A Voice For Men versus Roosh from Return Of Kings. The funny thing is that A Voice For Men is joining with feminists to bury Roosh on alleged rape charges. Roosh has denied said charges and stated he only engages in consensual sex. He even said Anonymous got involved persecuting him. I've been waiting for Anonymous to fuck the pooch and they did. Anonymous is now synonymous with organized online bullying and terrorizing people. Anonymous demands redemption from others but will they make right what they did or are they just bullies too? No better than those they condemn. Anonymous is busted. Getting back to Esmay,Roosh is right,Esmay is not much of an MRA. From what I hear Esmay tried game and got shot down that is why he is pissed at Roosh. I wasn't there when Esmay was using game so I can't critique him but I do know that game minus confidence is a guaranteed way to get shot down. I don't know if this is the case but it is the most common mistake men make. Esmay did the same things others did from the British House of Commons to the Governor of Texas Greg Abbott to the feminists that Esmay agrees with. They all persecuted Roosh. Esmay could have critiqued Roosh independently but to join forces with feminists is treasonous to me and Roosh is right in calling out Esmay on it. Esmay is a confessed liberal Democrat. That alone should place him on the list of misandrists because the Democrats are in reality the Femocrats. If you have doubts look at their support for Hillary Clinton. I've had my differences with A Voice For Men especially with Paul Elam who once told me to mend fences yet he is the biggest bridge burner in the manosphere. Esmay made the following statement: And every MRA I know views him Roosh as a crackpot, a loon, a con artist and snake oil salesman, and a self-serving liar and weasel...
Source How presumptuous of you Esmay. I have to say I back Roosh on this one. Roosh has stayed consistent while A Voice For Men goes through editorial changes every three months. Don't only that but A Voice For Men diplomats are a bunch of rude dumbshits who go to other MRA websites and act like they own the place. They did that at Antimisandry. Roosh,on the other hand,has welcomed those of us who are MRA's and he doesn't censor people,unlike A Voice For Men,which has turned into an echo chamber thanks to the current management at A Voice For Men.

Dave Futrelle has his followers dox MRA and his family

Most of you are aware of the current feminist bitch fit being pitched by David Futrelle. He started out by threatening the director of an upcoming documentary on the Men’s Human Rights Movement. Paul Elam and I wrote a response article calling out these threats. David fired back with an article calling Paul and myself liars.

On the heels of that article, David wrote a third article making good on the threats from his first article. Paul then wrote a solo article calling David out for following through with the threats that David says he didn’t make.

During all this a new Twitter account was created, quite reasonably assumed to be one of David Futrelle’s cult followers. This Twitter account contained my name and an image of my family.

There were five tweets posted by this account. The first gave out my home address and home phone number. Another tweet mentioned my daughter by name. Still another tweet demanded that I apologize to David for lying about him or more of my family’s private information would be leaked to the public.

I waited until now to inform you all of this, that is, until I could get home and see to my family’s safety and security. All of my family and friends will be notified via this article as to what has occurred. AVFM family and friends, say hello to my blood kin and non AVFM friends.

Since I live in a state with more guns than people, where a side arm is as common as a cell phone and where it is legal for 10yr olds to hunt with high powered rifles and without adult supervision, I’d say my family is now safer than the president.

At this time I would like to take a moment to thank all of you who have supported me through this. Believe it or not there were several feminists who hate my guts who condemned this doxxing of my family and worked to get the offending account shut down. A special thank you goes out to them as well.

I watched an old movie once, the name of which I cannot recall, about the civil war. One scene in that movie showed two soldiers, one Confederate and one Union, who happened upon each other while out alone. One soldier had some tobacco while the other had coffee. They shared each with the other. Nothing much was said. Then they turned and went their separate ways. It was a display of humanity in the middle of dehumanizing hell. That’s kind of the way I feel about those feminists sticking up for my family. Thank you all again.

Now, there was one person who has remain eerily silent about all this. That person is David Futrelle. Seems odd since all of this doxxing was done to avenge him. There is not a peep from Futrelle about this on his site or on social media anywhere that I could find. As a parent I know my kid is up to no good when she is quiet. Wonder if the same goes for adults (assuming the word applies)?

Futrelle has spent years painting a threat narrative around the MHRM. He does so by twisting statements made by MHRAs to fit his narrative. He takes articles calling out feminists for their bigotry and violence and uses them to convince his followers that we hate women. He uses articles expressing the idea that men should be able to defend themselves from a violent attack by a woman as examples that we want the unprovoked beating of women to be made legal. He takes articles calling out kangaroo courts on college campuses as evidence that we want the rape of women to be legal. He takes our comments about mass shootings, for example, ‘this is what happens when society ignores men’s mental health and when society chooses to ignore the pain and suffering of men’ and uses them as examples to convince his readers that we want to see women killed.

David isn’t dumb. He is a very smart liar. He leads his audience up to the edge and encourages them to drink the cool-aid. Drink it they do. He uses them to pad his pockets by working them into a fearful frenzy with hyperbole, half truths and outright lies.

It is a strategy that won’t play forever.

David once had a lot of sway with the MSM. That influence appears to be waning. The ABC 20/20 debacle was the turning point. Researchers at that ‘news’ organization used Futrelle as their only source and ran with it. Only to be made out to be fools, when the truth came to light. As a result of this most Main Stream Media publications shy away from Futrelle like he had fresh track marks.

So far, all of his efforts to mount a media attack on Cassie Jaye have resulted in one, impotent hit piece from a low level publication.

David Futrelle’s once strong connections to the MSM were never a real threat to us. In fact it was the reverse. Every time the MSM posted a hit piece on the MHRM, more and more men and women wanting to see the “den of misogyny” would stop by this and other websites to take a look. Many of them figured out that the MSM had lied to them and became supporters. Futrelle has actually been a big help to the MHRM.

But times have changed. The MSM attacks on AVFM have dropped. Now many formerly hostile outlets are publishing articles making the same arguments that MHRA’s have been making for years. Sensing an end to the feminist narrative and thus the end of his gravy train of cult followers, David has dialed up the fear mongering to create even more hysteria in order to keep the dollars, pounds, francs, deutschmarks and rubles flowing in.

I call his followers ‘cult members’ because that is exactly what they are. They are no different than a religious cult. They believe their prophet without question. As history shows us, cults usually become more violent and more dangerous as they near their end. That is what is happening now. For years Futrelle has been little more than nuisance and most often a source of amusement. That has now changed.

A close friend of mine recently commented that terrorists are stupid. I replied that the ones who strap bombs to their chests are stupid. But the leader is smart. He fills the minds of fools with his rhetoric and sends them off on suicide missions for his cause while he sits safely at home.

Now Futrelle sits safely behind his computer with what he thinks is complete deniability while his followers place innocent people including children in harm’s way for his cause. Futrelle doesn’t command these people like a terrorist mastermind. He just lights the fuse and lets the rest happen. He has remained silent about what happened to my family. He has pretended like it didn’t happen. He thinks he has deniability. He doesn’t.

Right now every single MHRA, their family and friends are in danger. The cultists believe what David has told them. They believe that if we are successful, then women will be enslaved, raped and slaughtered en mass.

Yes, they actually believe that shit.

I recently witnessed a conversation between two feminists stating that Cassie Jaye put herself in mortal danger by sitting in the same room with Paul Elam. They talked about how, in the trailer for her documentary, she was sitting on a couch close to Paul with her legs under her and her shoes off. They talked about how dangerous that was and how she should have been ready to run at a moment’s notice.

While these are the same people who condemned the person who doxxed me, I was shocked at the fact they actually believe that Paul is a monster. I thought it was all just rhetoric designed to poison the well. I was wrong.

This level of indoctrination and hysteria can only lead the most extreme followers of Futrelle to believe that any and all action is justified and collateral damage is acceptable. How do I know this? This sort of thing has played out in history many times before and has always followed the same pattern. Plus, unlike David’s fictitious threat narratives that he applies to the MHRM, we now have an example of Futrelle’s followers endangering the lives of innocent people to serve Futrelle’s interests. Remember that this little prick who doxxed my family didn’t demand that I apologize to feminism. He demanded that I apologize to Futrelle.

And on that note, here is the apology that was demanded under threat of releasing more private information.

David as I said earlier, you have created a completely unwarranted climate of fear around the MHRM for the sole purpose of padding your pockets and to destroy a movement that triggers your misogynistic need to appease women rather than treat them as fully capable adults. What has resulted, as was inevitable, is that one of your cult members has drunk the cool-aid and now feels that any action against MHRAs is justifiable including endangering the safety and well-being of innocent people such as my family. I hold you personally responsible for this occurring.

I consider the doxxing of my wife and daughter and the doxxing of me to be two separate issues. The doxxing of me has done one thing and one thing only. It’s has royally pissed me off. You think Paul Elam has been a thorn in your side? Ha! Paul is the guru of FTSU but I’m a junkyard dog with no owner and no collar. He, as a public figure of the MHRM, has a reputation to think about. I don’t.

Didn’t anyone ever tell you that you shouldn’t piss off a redheaded country boy from the backwoods of Tennessee? I promise you David that for the rest of your life there will be nights you cry yourself to sleep in anger and frustration over me. I’m simply going to keep doing what I’ve been doing; but I’m going to do more of it and do it better. I’m going to destroy the ideology of feminism. I’m going to burn it to the ground. I’m going make chili out of the ashes; then shit all over on Andea D’workins fucking grave. All the while making sure that you are aware of it all.

There is the apology that little snake wanted for you – Futrelle. I hope you like it.

Source

Dave has advertisers on his site. Let's ask them if they wish to be associated with someone like Futrelle who knowing puts innocent human lives in danger. Let's ask them if that is the image they wished to be associated with. Dave Futrelle's website

Dave Futrelle threatens filmmaker

Jack Barnes of A Voice For Men wrote an interesting piece on Dave Futile ganging up on Cassie Jaye,implying that bad things would happen to her if she wrote a fair piece about MRA's. You can read about Futile's threat here,just look for the red arrow on the right. Futile looks like he has a few skeletons in his closet and I'm guessing they are dead hookers. Dave looks like the type to go on a hooker killing spree and he just may try to add Cassie to his collection. Here is the video Dave Futile is scared of.

Retaliation

It appears that feminists have declared war on heavy metal. Fuck that,I say we return the favor that is why we are declaring war on female groups such as Fifth Harmony. Fifth Harmony is a feminist group,they even say so. Boycott Fifth Harmony,don't buy their songs,don't go to their concerts just economically starve them. We will do this to other girl groups too. So unless feminists leave heavy metal alone their sisters will also suffer. If they don't ease up on heavy metal gate we launch Fifth Harmony gate. The ball is in your court,feminists. What is it going to be.

The Vladek Filler saga comes to an end

Vladek Filler wins again
May 1, 2015 By Robert Franklin

At last, Vladek Filler is a free man. Oh, he’s been “free,” as in “no longer in jail,” for over two years. But when I say “free,” I mean free of all the consequences of the vendetta waged against him by his ex-wife and a shamefully corrupt Ellsworth, Maine prosecutor’s office that stopped at nothing to railroad an innocent man.

That man, Vladek Filler, has always been factually innocent, but now he’s officially, legally so. A state appeals court quashed his conviction of assault, the only prize former District Attorney Carletta Bossano’s office had to show for its relentless hounding of him.

It all started some eight years ago when, in the midst of their divorce and child custody fight, Vladek’s wife, Ligia Filler, claimed that he had raped her. Despite the fact that he had no police record, that the claim occurred during a child custody battle and that Ligia Filler was obviously emotionally unstable, Assistant District Attorney, Mary Kellett pursued the case against Filler with a zeal borne, not of a desire for justice, but of a desire for blood.

Kellett’s behavior in Filler’s case was not merely morally and ethically wrong, although it was both those things. It apparently was the product of her blind faith in the notion that women never lie about rape. I say that because of the multiple other rape and sexual assault cases prosecuted by Kellett that were either overturned on appeal or that she lost outright. Most prosecutors have a sense of when to charge a case, when to take one to trial and when an accused is probably innocent. Kellett seems to have had no such sense, at least when it came to sexual assault charges.

Otherwise, why did she not offer Vladek the dismissal the facts of his case so clearly warranted? Put simply, all Kellett had was the word of a woman who had every reason to lie and on whose behalf there was literally no evidence. Most prosecutors can see such a case for what it is — a sure loser.

Not only that, but the family court judge that viewed the same evidence Kellett did gave primary custody to Vladek, not his wife. How likely is it that a family court judge would place children with a father if the judge had the slightest inkling that the father might have done what his wife claimed? Without a doubt, that judge saw the truth — an emotionally disabled mother making wild, unsubstantiated charges against her husband for the sole purpose of keeping him out of his children’s lives.

Mary Kellett didn’t care. She knew, as few others did, that she would violate any rule of prosecutorial ethics and criminal procedure in order to put an innocent man in prison. And she almost succeeded. Filler was at first convicted, but the very judge who heard his trial for rape overturned the conviction on — of course — the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct.

But Kellett wasn’t finished. Ligia also claimed that Vladek had tossed water on her during an argument. Now, most prosecutors wouldn’t waste their time on such a trivial matter, particularly since, once again, there was no evidence that Vladek had done any such thing. But again, he was convicted, and again it was due to Kellett’s misconduct. Filler served 21 days in jail.

It is that conviction that the appellate court overturned on April 24th. It too was the product of Kellett’s many ethical violations.

But Filler is not a man to allow injustice to run free in the streets. Not content with complete vindication of all his actions by courts of law, he took on the District Attorney’s Office and Mary Kellett specifically, filing a grievance against her for her blatant wrongdoing.

He won that one too. Mary Kellett now has the distinction of being the only prosecutor in the history of the state to have been suspended from the practice of law due to her ethical violations while in the service of the people of the county.

But even that isn’t the end of the story. In last year’s election, DA Bossano was ousted from office due in no small part to her failure to oversee the corrupt behavior of her subordinate, Kellett.

In short, Vladek Filler’s story is that of a lone man standing up to a system of criminal prosecution that was all too used to running roughshod over men accused of sexual assault. What Mary Kellett did in Filler’s case are the actions of a lawyer to whom it never occurs that there might be adverse consequences to her violations of law. Almost certainly, she’d done similar things countless times before and was astonished when one person stood up and shouted “Halt!”

Mary Kellett is now out of a job and has a black mark on her record as an attorney.

If this had been an NBA championship series, Vladek Filler would have swept the opposition. Eight years later, he has his children and his criminal record is unblemished. He is indeed a free man.

What he doesn’t have, though, is his good name. Oh, the people who know him admire him and he has the love of his children and the avid support of his sister who did yeoman service on his behalf throughout his legal ordeal.

But the same Maine news media that were all too eager to shout from the rooftops allegations made against him, that reported his convictions, that unquestioningly channeled Ligia’s false claims and Kellett’s false statements about the case have suddenly gone quiet. Yes, those who were happy to convict an innocent man in their own court — that of public opinion — don’t care to report the fact that, at long last, he’s not guilty of the offenses charged. So far, not a word of his exoneration has been reported in the local or state news media.

In its own way, that’s every bit as shameful as Mary Kellett’s illegal, immoral and unethical conduct.

But in the end, Vladek Filler is the last man standing. For eight years, he stood against the enormous power of the state criminal justice system and won. That’s something for every reader of this blog to ponder. Vladek Filler’s grit and determination have been rewarded. Maybe yours can be as well.

And perhaps best of all, there are two kids (no longer little) down in Georgia who have a father they can look up to. They too can learn a thing or two about the power of being right and not backing down. Those kids may not yet realize it, but they’ve got a dad whose example will serve them all their lives.

Source

This is great. I've been following this from the beginning and now I'm glad it has been concluded. This is a solid MRA victory. This is one we should be proud of. We were pushed around and now we are pushing back. We weren't nice about things we were militant and we accomplished a successful pushback. Thank you to all those involved. For all those did the work and activism know that your work has paid off and that not only is Vladek Filler a free man Mary N. Kellett is a disbarred disgraced feminist former attorney who found out the hard way that you don't fuck with MRA's. We gave feminists an asswhopping they won't soon forget.

Time to say goodbye to a voice for men

ShlomoShunn • 4 days ago
Howzabout WOMEN learning to be more respectful of men...and not be so slutty, manipulative, passive, blame-mongering, childish, irresponsible, etc....hmmmm?

Frodo Mod ShlomoShunn • 4 days ago
Comment is bordering on misogyny sir.
Do not do it again.
I suggest you read the new TOS

Source

One would think this was posted on the NOW website or any other feminist website. It is not. The source is the A Voice For Men website. What has happened to this site? For one thing they let women and fags become moderators thus putting them in control of what real men can post. It has been demonstrated over and over again that women in the men's movement is a bad idea,even worse to put wannabe women in charge. If you are an MRA (by that I mean male MRA dedicated activist) then desert A Voice For Men and and instead work with us at the Men's Right's Blog. Here there are no female nor gay moderators and they're never going to female or gay moderators here. This is a dedicated men's rights site. No fags nor female cowshit here. Join us.

Sign the petition to oppose feminist oppression

Detroit has a Problem — Sign This Petition to Help Fix it
June 8, 2014 By Paul Elam

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you……

As recent history would lead us to fully expect, radical gender ideologues have made it their mission to silence our efforts to address issues affecting boys and men in Detroit at AVFM’s First International Conference on Men’s Issues scheduled for the end of June. And by “us” I mean a unique, diverse and eminently qualified line up of experts on gender issues, including those affecting men and boys.

We have a former National Organization for Women chairperson and two groundbreaking women who founded the international women’s shelter movement in two countries. One of them is the first black female to take office as a senator in North America. Also speaking will be psychotherapists, psychologists, attorneys, academicians and dedicated advocates from the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia and India. We have concerned attendees coming from around the globe to hear vitally important messages about their sons, brothers, fathers, husbands and other men they love.

It seems unthinkable that this petition is actually necessary. Who would have imagined that in 2014 we would have to petition a city, especially one so steeped in the historic struggle for civil rights, to demand that we be allowed to stand publicly and speak to issues like suicide, homelessness, corruption, incarceration, the welfare of children and the state of education?

Yet that is exactly what is happening.

We are calling on the city of Detroit to take note. Radical feminists have corrupted the idea of gender equity. They have transformed it into a Marxist agenda of oppressive control, including the silencing of all opposing views.

You are seeing this play out on the streets of your city right now.

We are asking people across the world to sign this petition. Even if there is not a single boy or man in your life, please help us help boys and men and help us preserve the tradition of basic civil liberties.

Tell Detroit this is unacceptable.

JTO updated

JTO post updated. Scroll down a couple of posts to read the update.

The hit piece on JTO that should have never been published

I was at A Voice For Men and I was reading an article which state that JTO is a traitor. I always thought JTO was a loyal MRA so this can't be true. I read the article,links and everything. If you haven't read this then by all means do read it. The article is by Diana Davison. So if you haven't read it then do so. Now that you've read the article you can see why I'm not too fond of this. First of all JTO is innocent of the charges against him and he was falsely accused by a drama queen. The point is this should have never been published. What was the purpose? You were bored and wanted to stir shit up? That is how we got here: bored women who wanted to stir shit up. One of the posters there echoed what I've been saying about women in the movement and this proves it. I noticed the women on A Voice For Men are blaming men for not understanding it is satire. Again men are attacked for "not getting it". Where have we heard that before? The point is the article does nothing but cause division and division at this time is not good for the movement.

Update: Here is Diana Davison's response to those that "misinterpret" her article. It is either she wanted to go after JTO,had second thoughts and is now trying to play this off as a joke or she sucks as a writer. Read the following:


Diana Davison says

February 1, 2014 at 1:37 PM

“the canyon of my despair”
“a flimsy staple gun that is somehow shooting

seven inch nails.”
“Why, John?…For the love of all good things,

WHY?”
“What are they paying you, John? And was it

worth your soul?”
“I am still too mortified and embittered to

feign the proper etiquette.”
“there is a small chance John the Other is not

dead to us.”
“It is entirely feasible that JtO hasn’t

actually abandoned the ship for a douche canoe

after all.”

“Run, John, run!”

Those are just a few of the reasons this is obvious satire. If anyone doesn’t see that, there isn’t much I can do to help them. It would be like trying to teach Borat to use the word “NOT!”

If feminists want to try and use this article to claim the MRM is falling apart it would be the funniest thing that could happen. I hope they do.

Source

No,it is not obvious. A lot of questions being asked by those outside of AVFM are being attacked. Blame and deflect. Typical feminist's tactics. I wouldn't trust these women for anything. It's all about them and if AVFM let them these same female "allies?" will put knives in the backs of those white knights and manginas that they will have a major WTF moment.

Update: this article is published after the interview with pro-male candidate Erick Bennett (see preceeding post) who is running to be U.S. Senator for Maine. I find it very interesting that this piece was published after that interview. An interview that gained ground and now this piece is published. A piece that is divisive. Notice how the women are defending each other and discounting what the men have to say. Like usual a lot of guys are playing white knight/mangina games by agreeing with the women. AVFM appears to have been infiltrated by the feminists.Coincidence? I don't think so. At Least that is what the circumstantial evidence shows.

AVFM Radio with guest Erick Bennett

I was listening to A Voice For Men Radio when Erick Bennett who is running for U.S. Senate from Maine was a guest on the show. In fact I wrote about Bennett here. I thought James Huff and Robert O'Hara did a good job interviewing Bennett. I thought it was very good. It's refreshing to see a candidate for public office that is not hyped up on misandry and/or in NOW's pocket. If you haven't listened do so it is a good talk radio show and gives us hope that those of us who believe in the truth will prevail over those that spread lies and terror.

JTO on porn

Porn, and semen: The devil’s glue

January 19, 2014 By John Hembling (JtO)


There might be a few thousand men world wide who haven’t watched porn online. You know, guys who live in villages in the jungles of Papua New Guinea – places without internet, or computers, or electricity, where the grass and the trees themselves are still black and white.

For the rest of the world though, it’s a safe bet that men watch porn. Its even a reasonably safe bet that women watch porn as well. A survey conducted several years ago indicated that 30% of porn’s online audience was female, and that number made no account of under-reporting, or lying by female respondents. However, in spite of a substantial female audience, most porn is a male oriented entertainment medium. And a nearly universal element of modern porn is a standardized device within the visual narrative of fantasy sex depicted in this entertainment medium, called the money shot, in which a male porn performer, usually reduced by camera angle to a de-personalized, disembodied penis ejaculates onto the face, or sometimes the face and breasts of the female performer.

This is usually the climax of a porn scene, and in fact is such an important element the visual language of modern porn that an entire genre of porn focuses on just this climactic moment. Taken from the japanese word meaning “to splash” the porn genre of “bukakke” is a distillation of this visual moment, often using more than one male performer to multiply the visual effect of the porn performance.

And this is a key point to remember; that what we’re talking about when we discuss porn is not sex. Certainly, it’s an activity that simulates sex. It involves naked people, various sexual activities, orgasms and so on, but the performers are not people in the privacy of their bedrooms doing what you or I would do with our respective partners. Along with one or more male and female actors are cameramen, sound technicians, if its a bigger budget, a producer, sometimes directors, make up people props and such.

Porn is not sex. It is theatre. Within that theater, the semen – or in some cases – the water and icing sugar splashed onto the face of the female performers is both more and less than bodily fluid produced during a male orgasm. It is, in the language of porn a mystical substance. What we might call semen, whether it’s icing sugar or corn starch or silicone and water or actual ejaculate is the distilled concentrated and symbolic representation of the sexual desire, the lust and the sexual identity not of the male actor, the guy objectified to a degree that he’s not even a person, but an anonymous cypher, standing as a place-holder for the projection of the male porn audience’s fantasy. Semen in porn is the symbolic representation of the sexuality, the lust, and the sexual identity of the viewer.

A female performer, turning her face up, opening her mouth and smiling sweetly as several tablespoons of sticky white fluid are squirted onto her face is conveying, in the visual language of porn – her acceptance, indeed, her love of the sexual desire, pleasure and sexual identity of the man watching that porn, from behind a computer screen.

That is the visual device employed, and that is what we are shown in porn every time we seem so-called semen splattering the upturned face of a female performer – this is not semen and even if it is semen, it is only there to symbolize the presence, the desire, and the human sexuality of that fantasy’s intended audience. Within the visual world of that fantasy, theatrically splashed semen is the symbolic acceptance of the masculine sexuality of the audience. It is, in modern context, almost a mystical fluid.

Of course in the view of those who condemn porn, calling for it’s prohibition and variously claiming it degrades the paid performers, this nearly mystical moment has another character entirely. Rather than symbolizing acceptance of the sexuality, the desire and the pleasure of that invisible first person presence – porn’s audience – the depiction of a female performer splashed with semen is a moment of unique degradation. She is the object of scorn, hatred and violence and those few tablespoons of fluid are concentrated malice.

Saint Augustine wrote in the forth century that the penis was a demon rod. This was a purposeful attack on male sexual identity because the pre-Abrahamic pagan religions provided a path to male spiritual identity. In order to yoke men to service within the doctrine of the early church, this natural path to male spirituality and and divinity had to be closed.

Feminism’s condemnation of male sexuality is a direct borrowing from the church’s closure of masculine sexuality as a path for men to connect to a spiritual identity through their own bodies and sexuality. To an anti-porn feminist semen cannot be a symbolic representation of human desire, lust and pleasure – splashing on the face of a female performer. No, for them this magical white fluid is the devil’s glue.

But for this conception to have currency, and in order for the theatrical act of performed sex to degrade women, male sexuality must be in poisonous in concept. And when this is understood the cry of degradation of women in porn is revealed as a truly hateful view of male sexuality and masculine identity.


Source

Most pederasts come from the feminist and religious communities as well. There was Susan Brownmiller,a feminist,who advocated sex with young boys then there are the priests that molested altar boys. We can see that the feminist and religious communities excuse the raping of little boys. If men are still in churches I recommend they get out of there and leave the church to fend for itself. If the church disposes of men then it's time men dispose of the church.

Kennesaw State University opens men's center

MHRM Now an Institutional Presence at Kennesaw State University

January 18, 2014 By VFM News and Commentary


Collegiate Activism Director Sage Gerard has successfully institutionalized the MHRM in the southeast United States.

At Kennesaw State University (KSU), student organizations (SOs) are organized into two tiers:

•Registered Student Organization (RSO) - A RSO is a SO that can freely set up table events and represent the KSU community. RSOs do not have much pull, but RSO status can only be achieved by demonstrating demand in the student body. Sage was able to generate this demand with your help.
•Certified Student Organization (CSO) - A CSO is a sought-after status that grants a SO the right to reserve space on campus and request funding from the Student Activities and Budget Advisory Committee (SABAC) for events of any scale, including entire conferences.

Sage founded KSU Men (KSUM) back in November, but KSU could only grant KSUM RSO status due to KSUM’s uncertain future. For that reason, KSUM could represent men’s rights, but had limited capacity to act.

After much effort, Sage secured CSO status for KSUM, making KSUM an integral part of the KSU community.

KSUM will now begin deliberations with KSU and AVFM regarding space reservations for a conference and speaker’s circuit for late 2014 or early 2015, depending on space availability and other factors.

Source

Department of Justice hit with a lawsuit over dear colleague

Falsely accused student sues Delaware State University

December 18, 2013 By Robert O'Hara

A Delaware State University student is suing that school for defamation of character and violation of his civil rights delawareonline.com. reported yesterday.

Andre L. Henry was brought up on criminal charges after a woman with whom he had consensual sex on October 24 falsely accused him of raping her. The charges were dropped on November 1 according to his lawsuit but around that time the University notified him that he was barred from campus pending an investigation and hearing provided by the school. He was not allowed on campus grounds or adjacent areas for 45 days.

“For 45 days he was kicked out of his home, … he was kicked off campus, he was kicked out of school, all based on an allegation” said Daniel C. Herr, Henry’s attorney. “You can’t do that for 45 days and then finally say ‘Oh, we’ve come to our decision. He was found not guilty.’ ”

On Nov. 1 Henry was informed by DSU’s Director of Student Judicial Affairs, Paula Duffy, that a hearing would be held in front the General Judicial Council on Nov. 6. The suit says that he was not informed of his right to have an attorney present.

The suit also says he was not informed of his right to remain silent and that he was not given the right to face his accuser who was not present at the hearing.

A separate hearing, of which Henry wasn’t informed, was held especially for the alleged victim.

Jesse Allen, Henry’s roommate, testified at his hearing saying he had been in the apartment’s common room the evening Henry and the woman had sex and testified the woman did not scream for Henry to stop, as she previously alleged.

Henry’s suspension was lifted upon the conclusion of the hearing.

“We found out yesterday that his on-campus disciplinary charges were found to be ‘not responsible,’” said Herr on Tuesday, referring to DSU’s General Judicial Council’s investigation.“We are still moving forward for damages because he was suspended for a total of 45 days pending a full investigation and full hearing, which we allege is a violation to his right to due process,”

The lawsuit comes at a time when the Department of Education and Department of Justice has come under fire for recent developments in the way they expect schools to pursue alleged sexual assaults and sexual harassment. On November 14 the Department of Education, in a letter sent to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, renounced it’s overall support of the “blueprint” letter drafted by the Department of Justice in which it was deemed appropriate to suspend students, as well as meting out other punishments, before hearings were even held.

“The lawsuit looks good on DSU, and this sort of thing is way overdue. Colleges and universities have been blatantly violating the civil rights of male students since the Obama administration issued the ‘Dear Collegue’ letter’,” said Paul Elam, a men’s advocate and founder of A Voice for Men. “If they won’t stop it for the sake of decency, then perhaps financially bleeding them will do the trick.”

Source

I wish Andre L.Henry well and may he be victorious against this injustice called "dear colleague" which demonizes men and make women damsels in distress regardless of the facts. We at the Men's Rights Blog salute Mr. Henry and wish him well. If he is reading here he should go to the Community of The Falsely accused at COTWA where he can gain valuable information which should hopefully serve him well.

A Voice For Men at Queen's Park in Toranto

I'd like to turn this back on the feminists: We hear your here,we hear you're queer now how about you disappear.

Another perspective of femitheist

It all starts innocently by Lucian Valsan

Apparently, there’s a debate, a discussion if you prefer, within the AVFM’s inner circle and MRM circles in general regarding whether the outing of Krista Milburn (also known as Femitheist) was the right thing to do.

I must confess that I am still appalled that this discussion takes place to begin with. At the end of the day, there’s no difference between the Krista Milburn business and The Agent Orange files episode. In both cases, some particularly sick individuals advocating mass murder, child abuse, eugenics, genocide and other practices worthy of the Third Reich or the Soviet Union were exposed for the whole world to see what they really think and talk about when they are under the protection of anonymity. So why is this particular case somehow different?

The words of two MRAs that I respect made me write this article. Had it not been for them, I would have dismissed the issue as non-relevant whilst sending a big thumbs up to JtO for his work.

One of the two MRAs that I respect told me that Krista Milburn poses no threat for men whatsoever. But is it really the case? At the moment of writing these words, Krista Milburn’s Youtube Channel has 11451 subscribers. By comparison, Paul Elam’s channel has 9206 subscribers. That’s right. The founder of this place, against whom an American national media venue is preparing a hit piece for alleged crimes of eating kittens has LESS influence and less subscribers than the piece of human vermin called Krista Milburn who, amongst other things, advocated the reduction of male population to negligible dimensions — a goal which she has never abandoned.

According to Krista Milburn, she supports a 90:10 female-male ratio and hopes to accomplish this through non-violent means but she does “not endorse achieving this by engaging in any sort of killing, genocide, or any other enactments of violence against anyone.”[1] According to her supporters (surprisingly some MRAs amongst them) this statement of hers is supposed to calm me so I no longer despise this piece of human vermin because cute little Krista doesn’t want to castrate or kill all men (or at least now she says she doesn’t want that anymore) – but just happens to hold the same views as other genocidal maniacs of the tormented history of Europe.

At the end of the day, Adolf Hitler didn’t always envision concentration camps and mass killings. In 1920, in Salzburg (Austria), the young, dashing and charismatic Adolf was talking only about the eradication of the “Jewish spirit”[2]. Nothing about mass murders that did happen at the end of the day.

In the same period, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin was talking about “peace through socialism and classless society after taking down the bourgeois spirit”. Nothing about the Gulags, the NKVD (later on the KGB), the brainwashing through torture experiments like Pitești or Aiud conducted including on children[3]. But these things happened.

Also, more recently, Charles Manson created his own cult of deranged individuals – only this time it was not a Party but a Family – and his creation impressed numerous remarkable people who called this “the whole Charlie Manson package.”

What do Charles Manson, Vladimir Lenin and Adolf Hitler have in common? For starters, all three of them were egocentric maniacs. Second of all, none of them killed anybody. Thirdly, all of them are responsible for trying to “change the world” by force whilst practicing the doublespeak of non-violence in their early days. The rest is just a question of nuance and semantics. The tenets are identical.

Is it really far fetched to compare Krista Milburn with those three? Perhaps it is. But think of it this way: Nobody thought of Lenin in 1914, of Hitler in 1918 or of Manson in 1954 as individuals even remotely dangerous for the society – despite the fact that all three of them had already expressed utopian totalitarian views.

A better example than those three is Nicolae Ceaușescu. The ruthless Romanian dictator even served prison time in his early 20s for spreading Communist agitation and ideas that decades after were to become the tenets of his dictatorship, a dictatorship that was to become the most oppressive in the former Eastern Block which took a quarter of a century to overturn. Ceaușescu also advocated non-violent means to achieve the Socialist paradise. And even now there are some sick individuals who dare to defend him.

How were all these possible? Because as the old say goes, in order for the evil to prevail, it’s enough that good men do nothing. Very few (virtually nobody) did anything to stop these maniacs while it was still possible.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fall of the USSR, a significant majority of people declared themselves outraged when very few good men decided to publish all the secret files about all the individuals. The pressure was immense in all the Eastern Block countries. However, good men disregarded the calls for ”compassion” and outed the former members of the repressive apparatus. Had it not been for all those good men, the history of the last 25 years in some of the European countries could’ve been entirely different.

And this brings us back to Krista Milburn – an egocentric utopian totalitarian maniac who under the guise of a neotenous face and claims of “non-violence” advocates for nothing less than yet another cleansing of the human population – this time along sex lines, as opposed to religious lines (Hitler), racial lines (Manson) or class lines (Lenin).

And here we are, with a lot of people, including some MRAs, calling us to tone down because “she’s not really a danger” or “she hasn’t done anything yet”. Or, some other people calling “free speech” on what she’s advocating – as if AVfM had demanded to shut her up. On the contrary – more free speech to Krista, please! And, if possible, with more audience, for the whole world to see the piece of human vermin she is.

Free speech, however, doesn’t mean free reign, nor does it mean that her right to free speech trumps the responsibilities that come with it. Just because she has a vagina and an arguably attractive face doesn’t mean she’s potentially any less dangerous than any other egocentric maniac.

If she really means what she’s saying (and I, for one, take her very seriously), then she, and her defenders, shouldn’t have any problem with her taking the responsibility for what she’s saying.

Let me be more clear: If this piece of human refuse were to be in my community – I’d love to know up front. If she were to be employed in a store from which I buy food, I’d like to know so I can stop buying food from that store until she’s either fired or the store goes bankrupt. If she were a teacher in the school where my kids or my nieces are going, I’d love to know that, so I can move them away as soon as possible. Because at the end of the day, not even her defenders would let their own sons to be educated by Krista. At least not as long as they are in their right minds.

Does what I say lack compassion for her? Yes, and I do. Call it my “intolerant nature” if you like. I tend to be highly intolerant with fascists, eugenic maniacs, former members of the Politburo, Communists and other totalitarian-oriented Utopian thinkers. If I had been more tolerant with these kinds of individuals, I’d still be living in hell – so no, thank you.

Another MRA that I respect tried to tell me that she is now redeeming herself and no longer advocates for mass killings. Well, I’ve seen former torturers in gulags claiming to now be advocating for democracy and/or freedom and at the first sign of trouble came back to their original ideas. So these kinds of attitudes coming from Krista should be treated at the very least with extreme skepticism if not outright dismissed.

Maybe I am too tired for this shit. Maybe I am too much of a grumpy Eastern European to get the nuances of this egocentric, nihilistic psychopath. Maybe. But, at the end of the day, I’ve seen this film before and each time nobody did anything about it before things went very wrong.

I wish I were wrong but for now it has been the case every single time that human beings learned one thing and one thing only from history: the fact that humans learn absolutely nothing from history.

Source:click here

I've had the same arguements with those white knights over there so I know how he feels. Lucian presents a strong arguement which supports what I've been saying: why grief over a fallen foe? Even if she never harms anyone herself she is still influencing others and they might turn her ideas into action. This is what I said.

JTO on toning it down and why it's never going to happen

MRAs: be quiet, be more polite by John Hembling (JTO)

Apparently, the issues addressed by the men’s rights movement are legitimate issues.

The rate of workplace death – somewhere around 93 percent male – is a real issue. The rate of male suicide – where 4 out of 5 who die by their own hand are men – that’s real, too. The overwhelming majority of the homeless who are male – real. The fact that men are sentenced more harshly in the criminal courts, and that fathers are grossly mistreated and abused by the family courts – real. And indirectly, children mistreated by those same family courts, who are denying them healthy relationships with their fathers, is a real issue as well.

These are real issues – and feminists have even deigned to acknowledge that they are real issues. I’m not being sarcastic at all.

There are also a few issues not agreed on by the self-appointed public arbiters of truth or fiction, those gender ideologues calling themselves “feminist” and claiming that all they ever wanted was equality, that most slippery of political goals.

Consider routine male infant genital mutilation – that’s not a real issue, apparently. Never mind that hundreds of children die every year from the shock and trauma of having the most sensitive part of their anatomy severed with no anaesthetic, and that the practice was normalized specifically to desensitize the sexual organs of boys by a medical quack in the 19th century. In spite of the fact that the sexual mutilation of girls is almost universally condemned – doing the exact same things to infant boys is no problem, and as an ongoing outrage and abomination – it’s not a real issue, and those objecting should sit down, shut up, and stop whining. Stop whining already.

Similarly, just as feminists and other fascists agree that mutilating male infants is routine but don’t see any particular problem with the continuation of the practice – men and boys are increasingly disenfranchised by the education system. Female graduation outcomes account for more than 65% of all graduation from institutions of higher education. This is not debated by feminists, but rather than recognizing the growing inequality produced by a systematically biased education system, they celebrate this as a positive outcome. Feminism is all about equality, and if feminist policies in education produce a growing inequality, then obviously, we need more feminism – to – ah, fix the problem.

Human rights activists who might become angry when their brothers, sons, fathers and friends are systematically marginalized by all this, ahem, equality, should pipe down, don’t get so angry, be more polite, wait your turn, and can you just be quiet, because the feminists are busy taking care of your issues, or they would be, if only you’d be silent, go away, and stop inconveniencing them by illuminating the human damage their policies produce.

The sadists informing public policy don’t like it when you point out that they are sadists.

But the fact is that the men and women in the men’s rights movement recognize human harm done directly to men and boys, and harm done indirectly to women and girls by feminist driven policies, are outraged by the decades of fucking indifference from the public when this human damage is pointed out.

Ill say that again. The human damage produced in full knowledge by feminist driven domestic policy is met with almost total indifference. It has been the case for decades, and those of us who actually give a shit about addressing these problems are just a little bit goddamn tired of that indifference.

Out of every 100 suicides, 80 are male. Oh well, yawn, who cares. Oh yeah, and in a world where men die earlier, when men kill themselves more, when men die violent deaths more than anybody else, where men comprise the majority of the homeless, and are increasingly disenfranchised by the education system – we are treated to an apparently never-ending narrative about how the whole world is a male-advantaging patriarchy in which being male means getting a cruise through life with the difficulty setting at easy.

Well, that’s not really all of it, even. There’s also rape culture. That’s a populist narrative in which it is claimed that the rape of women and girls is a central feature of our culture. It is claimed that the rape of women and girls is normalized, that we are socialized to accept rape as if it is acceptable.

However, the reality is that rape has no sex, and that if we are to throw out the politicized definition in most dictionaries and look only at violent sexual victimization – it’s men and boys who are the predominant victims across our culture. This is not to suggest that women don’t get raped, and that they are not also victimized, but we are living in a culture where the rape of men and boys, while it occurs with greater frequency, has been defined in the dictionary to not exist. It happens in the real world, but the dictionary says that’s not rape, and besides – boys raped by their teachers are lucky to get some – because they don’t get to say no, they are sex machines, not human beings, and certainly not children sexually abused by those they should have been able to trust.

Yeah, this rape culture is one where only the rape of women is treated as acceptable.

And for those of us who recognize the humanity of more human beings than just the members of our culture’s leisure caste – when faced with indifference at human harm, and sometimes the sadistic glee flaunted by abusers, sociopaths, criminals, and gender ideologues with political power – we get a little bit angry.

That’s not quite fair. We don’t get a little bit angry at the injustice, abuse, indifference, and the gleeful sadistic mockery and scorn heaped those most wounded, who are silenced by the prevailing zeitgeist – it is deserving of a deep and white hot rage which drives any real human rights movement.

But what we keep hearing is that, oh yes, the issues of this movement are real and legitimate, oh yes. But we’re too angry. In fact, if only we weren’t so angry, if only we weren’t so loud, then they – those people who have deigned to acknowledge that the concerns of the movement are real – they would have been willing to address these issues, if only we were less angry, not so loud and not so insistent. In fact, if men’s human rights advocates would just be polite, just be quiet, and just learn to shut up and sit down, feminists would be solving the problem’s we’ve been so vocal about. So seriously guys, why can’t you just be quiet and go away – because honestly, you’re really holding the whole class back.

That’s the message. It’s a bargain, isn’t it? Just be quiet and go away, and feminists will solve the problems we’ve been talking, or in some cases, shouting about. The issues are real, so say even the feminists, but doggone it, those darned MRAs are so angry and nasty – they’re the ones stopping anyone from addressing issues like 80% of suicides who are male or the fact that 90% of the homeless are men.

If only MRAs weren’t so loud, obnoxious and angry, these problems would be solved. Well, that’s the bargain being offered.

Time for a reality check.

MRAs were polite. Men’s human rights activists were polite, and did not express their anger, and played by the rules for decades. Oh yes, this movement is over a century old, and for most of that time, almost all the principal activists and writers within the movement stuck strictly to the facts, keep their tone civil, and hardly offended or upset anyone.

And you know how much notice anybody took of the issues, such as suicide, homelessness, joblessness, predatory and corrupt courts, violent death and so on?

The public took no notice whatsoever. Oh yes, the issues addressed by the men’s rights movement are real, and we’ll get right on that – hey, look – The Real Housewives of Las Vegas is on, oooooh shiny bullshit on my TV screen.

If the violent deaths of women were treated with the same total contempt and disinterest that the deaths of men and boys earn, there would be not feminists, but actual female rights organizations executing public officials in the town square, and putting whole cities to the torch.

However, the bargain being offered now is that if only we would just politely quiet down, fold our hands in our laps and go obediently away – well, by golly, all the issues we’re so inappropriately angry about would be solved almost right away.

And like just about everything else from the propaganda machine of the cult of hate and human damage calling itself feminism, this is a fraud. What they’re really saying when they tell us we’re too loud, and too angry, is that it would be awfully nice if we would just shut up, and go back to quietly and conveniently killing ourselves, or dying on the job of keeping everything else running for the benefit of the members of the leisure caste.

Get back to work for the benefit of those who disregard the humanity of men in preference for the utility of men. Go back to quietly and conveniently absorbing and dispensing violence for the benefit of your social betters. And when you’re broken beyond your continued utility to the leisure caste of our society, kindly be so good as to quietly and uncomplainingly kill yourself, so nobody who matters is troubled by the unsightly spectacle of a human being in pain.

That is the bargain being offered by those who say, in public, or in print, that the anger demonstrated by this human rights movement is inappropriate and counter productive, and that we should all just be more polite.

Here’s the counter offer.

To those acknowledging the reality of this movement’s complaints, workplace death, infant mutilation, corrupt courts, a systematic and abusive bias in the education system: Keep telling us to be quiet and polite. We’ll come for each of you. And we’ll target you with the spotlight, and put your indifference and contempt for the suffering of human beings on public display. Because we recognize that what you’re trying to do is coerce men to go quietly to their deaths, for your own convenience. We recognize that you know your continued exploitation of the disposability of human beings other than yourself is what you fear losing. We also know that without this movement, without the public discomfort created by a loud, angry and in many cases obnoxious men’s rights movement, what you’d have instead would be the redress of these grievances in the oldest and most basic format used by upright apes through the history of the human species.

Source:click here

I love how JTO fucking nailed this. It is fucking perfect. Fuck you Cathy Young,you showed your true colors. Go shove it up your Soviet shithole cunt. Fuck you bitch and everyone who agrees with you. We don't serve you and if we ever did the only thing we would serve you is a subpeona. Again fuck you. Here is some music to top it off:







Let us not forget who made this article possible:

Cathy Young

Fuck you cunt.

Piece of shit judge retires

From A Voice For Men:

Corrupt Judge Michael J. Kelly Is Retiring

According to West Virginia’s Bureau of Child Support Enforcement: Kelly Is Retiring

Controversial Judge Is Calling It Quits

Soon West Virginia families will be safe from abusive Kanawha County Family Court Judge Michael J. Kelly-who presides over some Putnam County cases. alt

The man that refused to let a dying grandmother from a final visit with her grandson, and held the same child hostage, in West Virginia, banning him from the beach, will be retiring at the end of 2013.

That’s the word from sources with the West Virginia Bureau of Child Support Enforcement.

Kelly can read the writing on the wall. Parents and children, who have had their civil rights trampled on by the Cretin in a Black Dress, were lining up to trash Kelly at campaign stops had he been stupid enough to run for re-election, in 2016. And he would never be able to explain his mental instability about denying the grandmother’s visit with her grandson. Instead, Kelly’s chickening out and retiring.

Soon, but not soon enough.

Facebook followers posted the following comments when they read the news:

Sabrina Leighann Ledford I hope this means good things for you and Matthew

23 minutes ago via mobile

· Denise Adams Miller Bout time, don’t you think?

22 minutes ago via mobile

· Kimberly Smith Case I hope you see some justice from his replacement, and sleep better at night…LoL

Editor’s note: this item originally appeared on PutnamLIVE. For previous entries on this corrupt judge, see West Virginia family court corruption and incompetence –DE

Here are some of the comments:

De2nis in reply to markis1

They’re animals. When they see a female, they see a beautiful potential mate. When they see a male, they see competition.

Source:click here

If they are animals then they should be neutered for the good of society. Let the judge's male victims have at him,deciding his fate. )-)

Feminists hate boys and want to hurt them

Feminists target lecture on boys’ education
By Della Burton

MR-E hosting lecture on boys in education.

Men’s Rights Edmonton has arranged a lecture event to be held on July 29th at 7pm at the Edmonton Public Library (Stanley A. Milner branch) with Dr. James Brown, author of Rescuing our Underachieving Sons.

The Stanley A. Milner Library is located downtown at 7 Sir Winston Churchill Square.

Dr. Brown, a career educator with a doctorate in education and post doctoral diplomas in Educational Administration and in Curriculum and Instructional Leadership, will be discussing the challenge of improving boys’ education.

Due to opposition by local feminists, promoting the event has been a challenge.

According to Eric Duckman, posters advertising the event have been vandalized with paint or torn down almost instantly after being put up.

This leads to the question, why would feminists be so opposed to a lecture by a highly respected and credentialed educator on improving boys’ performance in school?

There may be an opportunity to get an answer to that question at the event, as a counter-event has been organized to take place at the site. The event, titled “Feministing at ‘Rescuing Our Underachieving Sons’” is described by its organizer Brittany Kustra as a chance to confront attending men’s rights activists over their “Don’t be that girl” poster campaign, and to “see who is behind the group.”

In other words, she plans to protest a scheduled lecture on an unquestionably positive topic with demands to discuss another, unrelated topic, and she will be mining for group member identities.

MREdmonton and AVoiceforMen invited live debate on blog talk radio following news coverage of the posters, and feminists everywhere, including the most vehement critics of the campaign, lined up to not take them up on it. In light of that, it’s odd that Brittany should think it necessary to disrupt an unrelated event to revisit the controversy.

Rather than take the offered chance to have all of their questions answered, this feminist group has decided to disrupt an event held for the benefit of boys who are underserved by their education system. One cannot reasonably argue that after disregarding such an open opportunity, the goal of feminists planning to converge on Dr. Brown’s lecture is merely to ask questions. Without that as a possible motive for the protest, that leaves their other goal of identity mining.

However, a group with that goal in mind would have been more sneaky than to alert the very people they seek to identify. The Facebook event page for Feministing at “Rescuing Our Underachieving Sons” is public, and they’ve made sure that the MREdmonton group would be aware ahead of time that they were planning to crash the lecture. That seems counterproductive, unless there is a different goal.

Could it be that Brittany and her friends just absolutely hate little boys, and want to deny them any effort that might be made to improve their circumstance within the education system, or are they maybe planning to hijack Dr. Brown’s lecture and distract from its intended purpose just to draw attention to themselves?

Source:click here

This is proof feminists hate boys. This is proof that the term "feminazis" fits them to a tee. What other conclusion can you come with? the proof is in the pudding and this is the proof.