The changing roles of women

Yet men's roles remain the same.

Require women to also sign up for selective service

It is only fair that if women can be in combat units all women must register for selective service upon turning the age of 18. Men must deal with many penalties for failing to register, from fines up to 250,000 dollars and jail time, to being blocked from federal student financial aid, federal jobs, and job training programs.

To sign petition

Brave man takes out female terrorist

“Harmless” Female Terrorist Tries Stabbing Innocent Man… Instantly Gets 100mph Justice

Wilmot Proviso November 24, 2015 at 7:43am

A female Palestinian terrorist tried killing Israeli pedestrians in one of the latest knife attacks in the beleaguered country. However, a driver quickly came to the rescue, running over the woman with his car.

And, while it didn’t quite happen at 100 miles per hour, it certainly must have felt that way for the victim, as justice was swiftly delivered.

The incident, one of a series of such attacks, happened on Sunday in the West Bank town of Samaria. At about 9:15 a.m., a Palestinian woman began attacking Israelis with a knife in Brigade Square, according to WND.

The damage could have been much worse had it not been for a hero named Gershon Mesika. Mesika, the former head of an Israeli settlement group called the Samaria Regional Council, was driving nearby when he caught sight of the woman conducting the attack. In an instant, he knew what he had to do.

“I heard someone shout ‘terrorist’ and run toward a girl from Har Bracha, wielding a knife,” Mesika said in an interview with Army Radio. “I made a quick decision: I veered to the right and slammed into her.”

“A soldier then came and finished it,” Mesika added.

The terrorist was initially described as in serious condition, but was later pronounced dead.

The attacks have taken a toll on the Israeli population. According to the Times of Israel, an 18-year-old Israeli was killed on Monday. Another Israeli was also killed in a knife attack on the same day the Samaria attack took place.

The attacks have even taken the life of Americans — Ezra Schwartz, an 18-year-old from Boston, was killed Nov. 19, and Richard Lakin, a 76-year-old peace activist died Oct. 27 from wounds suffered in a bus attack in Jerusalem on Oct. 13.

These are the “harmless” widows that President Barack Obama says we shouldn’t be afraid of. If Obama and American liberals think that we can judge threats by gender, they have another thing coming.

Source

Not just Obama but Bill O'Reilly too. O'Reilly said he wouldn't allow muslim men into the country but he would allow women and children. Like most western castrati Obama and O'Reilly underestimate women at the expense of everyone else. Also Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has also said he will only allow muslim women and children into Canada. Canada is finished,stick a fork in it. The United States on the other hand may stand a chance with a lot of American Governors stating they won't allow them into their respective states. Obama is threatening to withhold federal funds if these governors do not agree with him. Let's see what happens. Stay tuned.

Catherine Lhamon: the woman behind "Dear Colleague"

Catherine Lhamon
Glenn Reynolds: The unilateral war on college men
Glenn Harlan Reynolds 11:01 a.m. EDT September 30, 2015
An assistant secretary of education thinks she can rewrite rape law by writing a letter.

It appears to many — including me — as if the Obama administration is engaged in a war on college men. Using debunked statistics, the president, the vice president and various other political officials have falsely claimed that there’s an epidemic of rape on college campuses, even though campus rape is, in fact, falling, just as off-campus rape is. (And, in fact, rape is less common on campus than off).

And, ever since the Department of Education issued a ”Dear Colleague" letter to universities in 2011, in essence ordering them to adopt new and draconian campus “sexual assault” rules that treat accusations as presumptively true and force the accused — almost always men — to prove their innocence, sometimes even very strong evidence of innocence is ignored.

Spearheading this effort has been Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights Catherine Lhamon, who has characterized the letter as binding on colleges and universities even though it is not a law, was not adopted as a formal or informal rule making after notice and comment under any law, and appears to have very little to do with the federal anti-discrimination law Title IX, which says only that “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”

Title IX was supposed to force colleges to admit women to programs formerly reserved for men. The law says nothing about sexual assault, sexual harassment, or the duty of universities to investigate criminal behavior on their own instead of referring crimes to law enforcement. But through a period of interpretation and reinterpretation, that simple statutory language has produced reams of federal paperwork that, in effect, turn a simple academic non-discrimination rule into a rape law that lacks the due process protections and evidentiary standards of actual rape law.

Now it appears that Congress has noticed. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., crashed a Senate hearing last week to grill Deputy Assistant Secretary of Education Amy McIntosh about past statements by Lhamon that purported to establish the “guidance” letter as binding law. How could this be binding, asked Sen. Alexander, when it’s simply a letter issued without any of the procedures required for administrative rule making?

McIntosh didn’t offer much of an answer, and that’s because there isn’t one. As some, including Ari Cohn, have argued for a while, the Department of Education is acting unlawfully here.

A law, to be binding, must pass both houses of Congress and be presented to the president's desk, where it must either pass into law or be vetoed and then overridden by a two-thirds vote of each house. Because this procedure, which the framers of our Constitution designed in order to make lawmaking difficult, turns out to make it difficult to pass laws, we also allow administrative agencies to issue regulations that are binding as law. But those regulations can be issued only after a draft is published and the public has a chance to comment, via either formal or informal rule making.

A mere letter from a bureaucrat, which is all the “Dear Colleague” letter is, has no binding authority. At most, it suggests that the bureaucrats might be willing to go to court to try to convince a judge that their interpretation of the statute is correct.

So why did colleges roll over? Law blogger Scott Greenfield suggests that it’s because the colleges are also warring against college men: “After all, why should a college risk the loss of its lifeblood (federal money) for the sake of protecting a few guys, particularly when the colleges pretty much agree with Lhamon’s progressive ideals?”

Greenfield notes that once Columbia University was sued by a male student claiming that his Title IX rights were violated because of the university’s response to a false accusation, it changed its mind and decided that Title IX didn’t create much in the way of student rights after all. Greenfield concludes: “Regardless of whether one embraces the policy choice embodied in Lhamon’s ‘Dear Colleague’ letters or not, there is no doubt but that it was imposed without lawful authority and adopted by schools who chose to sacrifice one segment of their student population to appease another segment. This is not the law. This is not what Title IX mandates. And they know it, even if you don’t.”

Greenfield is right. It’s nice that members of Congress are taking notice. But male college students and their parents, as well as alumni and trustees — and those women noticing that there’s a shortage of college-educated men all of a sudden — need to ask why there’s a war on college men, and why colleges, seemingly, are on the other side.

Source

There is no other way of saying it. This bitch needs to go to prison. She has deliberately fucked up men's lives. She needs to pay. The best way of doing that is to contact your Representative and Senators and tell them to send Lhamon to prison.

Jameis Winston goes after his accusers

Kirby Dick and Amy Herdy
n Orlando law firm representing Jameis Winston and FSU administrators are protesting CNN's decision to air the film "The Hunting Ground" Sunday.

"We are writing to formally caution CNN that the portions of the film 'The Hunting Ground' pertaining to Mr. Winston are false and defamatory to Mr. Winston," Gray Robinson attorney John A. Boudet wrote in a letter to CNN on behalf of the Tampa Bay Bucs starting quarterback. "We urge CNN to reconsider the reckless decision to proceed with the broadcast of this deeply flawed documentary in the face of overwhelming evidence that the film's producers consciously and intentionally failed to adhere to any accepted journalist standards."

The film, which earned positive reviews at the Sundance Film Festival and screened at theaters throughout the country, focuses on sexual violence on college campuses and is set to air at 8 p.m.

While stressing Florida State does not tolerate rape, President John Thrasher wrote in a statement the film "contains major distortions and glaring omissions to support its simplistic narrative that colleges and universities are to blame for our national sexual assault crisis."

Winston's attorney and FSU both cite an email from film producer Amy Herdy to one of Winston rape accuser Erica Kinsman's attorneys that states, "We don't operate the same way as journalists -- this film project very much is in the corner of advocacy for the victims, so there would be no need to get the perpetrator's side." Another email stated the filmmakers planned to "ambush" Winston with cameras after he declined to be interviewed for the film. The emails were obtained during ongoing litigation involving FSU, Winston and Kinsman.

Then you are propagandists and yellow journalists. Bitch,if you think that faggot and you are immune from legal action guess again.

Harvard professors also questioned the accuracy of another incident highlighted in the film and asked CNN not to air it.

Film director Kirby Dick and producer Amy Ziering have promoted themselves as advocates working on behalf of victims of sexual assault on college campuses. They defended the accuracy of their film during interviews and updates posted on the film's twitter account.

"The facts make them look bad, so they don't want people to see the film on @CNN. We'll let viewers judge Sunday," one Tweet attributed to Ziering read.

CNN has not issued a statement in response to the protests.

John Clune, one of Kinsman's attorneys, released a statement that read, "Mr. Winston is apparently in the midst of another PR battle this week due to the release of The Hunting Ground on Sunday. When your lawyers' letters written on Friday are somehow getting printed in the media on Saturday, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what’s going on. His latest attack is an attempt to revive his lawyers' media themes and, as expected, shows no understanding of rape trauma and misrepresents the actual evidence.

"More importantly, Mr. Winston should get used to the rape allegations against him because film or no film, they aren’t going away."

Winston, a former FSU star quarterback and current Bucs starter, is the only person accused of raping a student named in the movie.

Winston was never charged with a crime after an investigation by state attorney Willie Meggs, who noted delays and unusual actions taken by the Tallahassee police were factors in his decision.

An FSU hearing found there was not enough evidence to deem Winston responsible for violations of the school's code of conduct.

The letter from Winston's attorney to CNN closes by stating, "CNN may have persuaded itself that Mr. Winston's status as a public figure insulates your company from a libel judgment. If CNN decides to proceed with this broadcast, we will perhaps have the opportunity to test that legal proposition in a court of law."

Source

Jameis Winston should definitely sue not only the producers and anyone else who were part of creating this film but his accusers as well. You should sue everyone of them into the poor house and make sure they can never find work,have a decent place to live or any good life whatsoever. They are misandrists,they are evil.

Attention men of Missouri

Perhaps Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) shouldn't be shooting her mouth off. There were men who voted for her too but she doesn't give a fuck about them. Don't come off with some mangina/white knight bullshit about this being a "joke". No male senator would have made the same comments about women. If he did these same mangina/white knights would be storming the castle. McCaskill's re-election won't happen until 2019. But why wait? I say we contact McCaskill (click on opinion of legislation)and tell her we are not amused by her video. If you are a resident or are legally able to vote in Missouri vote for her Republican challenger. We don't need this misandrist in office.

UPDATE: Senator McCaskill has laughed off the video as a joke. Tell her you don't think it is a joke. If a male senator had said the same thing about women McCaskill would be leading the charge to make him apologize. If you have already emailed her then please do so again and demand that she apologize to the men of Missouri and America.

Tea Party embraces the men's rights movement

Is This National Tragedy Being Caused by Radical Feminism?

Feminists have been quoted for years as saying, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” The male bashing has become prevalent, even normal, in our society.

Because of this, because of the hassle and frustration that feminism heaps upon men for being men, more and more men are now starting to avoid marriage.

Can you really blame them? Feminists need to ask themselves, “If someone abused me for just being who I am, would I want to spend time with them much less live with them?”

Now, mind you, I’m not talking about men being abusive (and the whole feminist argument that all sex is rape is ludicrous. If that were true, feminists wouldn’t have sex, heterosexual or homosexual). I’m not talking about men being cruel. I’m talking about men being men. You know, in general, more focused on accomplishment and making things happen in the physical world (as opposed to the relationship world) than women (this is not to say women don’t get things done or that women are less valuable than men. Just different, that’s all.).

So, men are avoiding marriage and, in essence, saying, “Okay, feminists, if you think you can handle it all yourself, if you want to figure out how to get pregnant without a man’s involvement in any way (good luck with that), if you want to take care of those children without a father’s involvement or influence, if you want to be the sole income provider in your household, if you want to truly be autonomous of men, you got it. Because I’ll go where I am valued for being who I am.”

Frankly, it’s a tragedy for our society. Our children need fathers just like they need mothers. Our women need husbands just like men need their wives.

This gender segregation being foisted upon us by the feminists will stop one way or the other: either because people wake up and appreciate the differences in gender and each other or because that culture of foolishness will die off because it can’t reproduce without both genders.

Source