Saturday, March 31, 2007

Get pedophiles? Get rapists? Or get men?

Hold the child up as the most important part of the state for the people will give up their rights for the child.- a paraphrase of Adolf Hitler.

All men are rapists. That is what they are.-Marilyn French.

I was watching "To catch a predator" on MSNBC and they inform the audience that the decoys that lure the men there are not cops but members of some vigilante webgroup called Perverted Justice . Guess what,it seems they only target MEN. In a day and age where WOMEN are violating children and getting insanely light sentences these assholes only target men. Here is some bullshit statistic from their site:





Between 1% and 6% of American men are pedophiles; for unknown reasons, very few women have

the disorder.

Source: American Psychiatric Association





So you can see the mentality of this group. In fact someone brought this up on Salon reader's reponses:

Anon Says:

January 30th, 2007 at 9:05 pm

Why doesn’t Dateline or Perverted Justice ever go after Women? Anyone ever just looked through Myspace and seen how many Bi- Women prey on the young girls?
Check it out. Look at the comments they leave on the YOUNG Girls pictures… that could be OUR Daughters. Many of my TEENAGE daughter’s friends get comments form WOMEN saying they would like to “Lick them all over”


I guess this is an official response from someone in perverted justice since they give the impression that they are. It sounds like a cop out to me:

No one of importance Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 8:09 am

Hi Anon,It’s not for lack of trying, let me assure you that. Remember, we can’t GO AFTER people. Legally, we have to wait for them to come after us. Since 2004, the organization has busted one woman. One. We also don’t profile people based on their sexual orientation (in this case, bisexuality), because doing so is not only discriminatory, but is also an exercise in futility, as doing so would remove all credibility from our organization and allow more pedophiles to roam free. In any case, I would report the stuff that you’ve been seeing to the police. You can make a difference as well.


So let me guess,they only go after straight guys then. Wait a minute. Aren't they targetting someone because of their sexual orientation? Yes,I believe they are. Are they being punished? No,no they are not. In fact they are rewarded with police involvement and community recognition. Now the police are in the act and they are able to scam $30,000 per victim or they put that man in jail and this seems to be good revenue generator,sort of like john stings and speed traps. They also boast about a high conviction rate but that is because they are civilians and there is no such thing as "civilian entrapment". This is an interesting way to conduct the law. They are basically "deputized" when helping the police but become civilians again when the case gets to court and it seems that they don't have to testify in court or else their anonymity is gone. This goes against due process and confronting witnesses against you as they only use the transcript from the chat room to persecute you. One of the men accused said that the decoy BADGERED him into meeting her. Can you say entrapment? Yep. Also a lot of what was featured in the show was one-sided diolouge,against the defendant as we wouldn't want to hurt the persecution's case now would we.

So what are these "good?" people at perverted justice like? Well,according to a watchdog group that keeps an eye on perverted justice called Corrupted Justice .

Here is a couple of excerpts from their site:

Two years ago, the only source of information about Perverted-Justice was the thoroughly "filtered" and often completely falsified information provided by Xavier Von Erck. Over the course of the past two years we have exposed his "historical alterations" on a regular basis - From his assertions that he did not knowingly employ minors in performing graphic sexual chats with men online, to his asinine statements that Perverted-Justice never makes mistakes, to the fact that the majority of Perverted-Justice participants have serious psychological or drug dependency issues. We have provided page after page of completely third-party-verifiable, irrefutable evidence that all is not as the PJ staff would have you
believe.

Unfortunately, their recent partnership with MSNBC and Dateline has only served to give them an air of legitimacy that they absolutely do not deserve. Of course Dateline, with more interest in ratings than truth, completely disregarded the pages and pages of incontrovertible evidence of serious wrongdoings by PJ that were sent to the program’s producers shortly after the first episode aired. It certainly wouldn’t do to have their ratings-generator exposed for the hackers, juvenile delinquents, drug abusers, social misfits and sexual fetishists that they really are…

So they are basically breaking the law themselves to catch others and it seems that their own back yards are cluttered as well but they only see other's behavior and never they're own.

Another misandrist is Julie Posey. She entraps men in chatrooms,she is a P.I. and part-time cop:(note: even the D.A. that is about to be mentioned has his wife montior so-called "molestors". Is she a cop or a convient way for him to skirt the law? I'll bet on the latter.

Check this out:

“Anytime I go into a chat room and portray myself as a young teen,” says Reserve Officer Julie Posey, who is currently with the Wellington (Kan.) Police Department, “I’ll be contacted by 20 to 40 men in the first few minutes. And they’re not saying ‘Hi, how are you?’ They’re saying, ‘Are you naked?’”


Posey began hunting predators almost 10 years ago as a civilian intern working with Mike Harris, an investigator at the Jefferson County (Colo.) District Attorney’s Office. At that time, Harris was frustrated that there were so few ways to be proactive when it came to preventing child sex assaults. He reasoned that sex offenders were probably hanging out in the same chat rooms that children frequented, and began looking for an Internet-savvy helper. He was put in touch with Posey, and their very first case resulted in the arrest and conviction of Robert Stude, a 36-year-old man who, after only a few Internet chats and phone calls, wired Posey $1,000 to bring her two fictitious kids to Kansas so that he could have sex with them.


Well,I guess we give women a free pass then,huh?

€œI can’t imagine any DA not wanting to do it,” says Posey. “They can see that there’s no entrapment; you’ve just got this guy blabbing on and on that he wants to have sex with a kid. You know he’s got child porn on his computer and, even if you can’t go with state charges, you can still go federal.”

And if that doesn't work in misandric persecution then try the "civil" route.

Harris, who is still tracking pedophiles online with his wife, Cassandra, reports a 100-percent conviction rate from his arrests, and every one of Posey’s tips and subsequent arrests have led to a conviction. Special Agent Don Condon of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, who has been actively seeking predators online for 10 years, also says that he has never personally lost one of these cases.

I doubt Harris' wife is a cop so there is no "police entrapment" there. Sounds like skirting the law to me.

Entrapment is rarely an issue, mainly because once officers have seized a suspected predator’s computer, they usually find so much other incriminating evidence that it buries the suspect in an avalanche of guilt and the majority of cases end in a plea. In almost every instance, the suspect is in possession of child porn; images, which often number in the thousands and are usually categorized by preference. In addition, many pedophiles keep pictures solely for trade, and they often save chat records and e-mail correspondence.

What happened to the "fruit of a poisoned tree" which made all evidence in that case NON-ADMISSIABLE because of it was "entrapment"? Oh well,I guess that died with the Constitution.

“The defense will occasionally try to attack the case prior to going to trial with, for instance, motions to suppress,” says Condon. “Or they may try to raise an issue as to how the evidence was gathered or how it was maintained.”

Uh,yeah,because cops alter things,with or without malice.

But these attempts are rarely successful, and few suspects choose to have a jury or judge view their explicit computer chat logs and the graphic photos of children engaged in sexual acts, especially since these predators quite often have families and sometimes high-profile careers.

Ah,yes,the shame factor. They use this in john stings too and they count on the shame causing the defendent to plead guilty.

The vast majority of predators are male. However, there have been cases of mothers willing to sell their children for sex and, oddly enough, McLaughlin’s first case in 1996 involved a woman who was meeting male teens online and participating in cybersex, phone sex, and actual meetings.

Did they treat her like they do the men or did they handle her with kid gloves? (guess which one I'm betting on)

These pedophiles cross all class, cultural, ethnic, and age boundaries. The Keene (N.H.) Police Department has arrested several teachers, a priest, a police officer, a psychologist,and many other prominent members of society.

Were these these teachers female? The vast majority that screw up are. A cop was busted too,how fitting. (That cop supported the matriarchy,he doesn't get my sympathy)

When asked to profile cyber predators, Condon issues a grim laugh. Then he says, “Male and alive.”

You fucking redneck. Resign from the department you're a disgrace.

“I do this because I was molested as a child,” says Posey, whose years of tracking pedophiles as a civilian inspired the 2003 television movie, “Defending our Kids: the Julie Posey Story,” and whose experience with a serial rapist at age 16 led to her chance meeting with Harris. “I want to prosecute these guys and make sure that they can’t victimize any more kids.”

Source: Police Mag

Does this woman go after female pedophiles by having someone pose as a young boy? Or does she just unleash her wrath upon men?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with the links? Try these:

http://www.perverted-justice.com/ - Perverted Justice

http://www.corrupted-justice.com/index.html - Corrupted Justice

http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2003/09/15/perverted_justice/index.html - Salon article and readers responses.

The Police Mag link works.

Labels:

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Good news indeed

H.S. Coach Awarded $4.5 Million For False Accusation In Sex Case

No Charges Were Ever Filed Against Patrick Gillan

POSTED: 11:49 am PST January 20, 2005UPDATED: 5:28 pm PST January 20, 2005

LOS ANGELES -- A San Marino High School girls' basketball coach publicly identified as a sexual molestation suspect but never charged was awarded a total of nearly $4.5 million Thursday in compensatory damages.

A second phase of the trial to determine if punitive damages will be awarded to Patrick Gillan on top of that gets under way Thursday afternoon.

Gillan sued San Marino, its police department and several officers, who held a news conference to identify him -- and ask any other supposed victims to come forward -- after he was taken into custody in December 2001. His mug shot displayed that day was shown on TV and printed in several newspapers.

No charges were ever filed against the coach, who was put on paid suspension during the investigation and reclaimed his job two months later.

In his lawsuit, filed in May 2002, Gillan alleged defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from false arrest.

In the initial verdict phase, a Los Angeles jury awarded Gillan $1,937,000 for past damages, and $2,516,000 for future loss of earnings -- which totals $4,453,000.

Gillan had asked for $1.2 million to $3.8 million for past damages, and $900,000 to $3.6 million for future damages.

The jury will now decide if Gillan is due punitive damages from the officers involved in calling the news conference.

The officers contend they were just doing their job by investigating a legitimate claim -- made by Taylor Bouchard, who by then was in college.

Bouchard, who graduated from San Marino High in June 2001 and is now 21, testified in the civil trial and still contends she was sexually molested when she was 17.

According to court papers, Gillan was released immediately after being booked by San Marino police, and the paperwork stated only that he had been "detained."

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert O'Brien, who presided over the trial, ruled Thursday that there was no probable cause for the arrest.

The department continued to investigate Bouchard's claims, and in February 2002 the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office decided not to prosecute Gillan.

Bouchard and her mother were named in the Gillan lawsuit, but as part of a settlement deal eventually were dropped as defendants.

Source: http://www.nbc4.tv/education/4112461/detail.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes,it is good news. I,on the other hand,would not have allowed her mother and/or the accuser to squirm out of it that easily as I would have sued them as well.

Labels:

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Double Standardism

There is in our society a double standardism in which women get preferential treatment over men. There lies the misconceptions in society of the "powerful man" and the "helpless little woman". These misconceptions have permeated every sphere of our society; from the legislatures to the courts (family,criminal and civil)to law enforcement to the media to how we interact with each other in everyday life. We call this "chivilary" and FORCIBLY brainwash men with it while telling women to be "indepedent" and to practice male bashing. However,when women practice male bashing why should men be chivilarous?

They apparently thought of that because that is probably why they came up with VAWA 2,which allocates no money for men or children and requires a man to listen listen to his partner's abuse or else he violates this law and gets locked up as a "criminal". Most likely he receives more time than a woman who killed her husband and/or children. VAWA 2 is unconstitutional as it violates the 14th amemdment to the U.S. Constitution but it seems as though our lawmakers don't want to hear that in fact Sen. Joseph Biden made sure MRA's didn't testify when this monstosity was jammed through congress thus making Biden a big time mangina. Biden is so much of a mangina that MRA's have placed billboards on Biden's train route informing him of the plight of men and he still ignores our message.

The feminists use this double standard to their advantage to coerce men into doing what they want and chances are it's to coerce other men by whatever means they can. By standing up this cowshit can we hope to eliminate it. The real men will be the resistors as chivilary in this day and time is safe hiding place for manginas,cowards and other scondrels.

Labels:

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Vote for Hitlery

I've got to write about something but what? I can't think of anything.

(racks his brain trying to come up with something)

(thinking)

(thinking)

*ding dong*

Great,somebody's at the door,as though I don't have enough distractions as it is.

(gets up and goes to the door and opens it)

Person at the door: Hello sir,I hope I'm not intruding upon your time.

No,not really. What are you selling?

I'm a campainger for Hillary Clinton and her bid for the presidency.

I don't think Hillary would be my choice for president,in fact if I did vote for her I would have my head examined.

I see,sir but did you know that as a feminist Mzzzz Clinton believes in equality of the sexes.

Feminism is anything but equality. Feminism is about female superiority.

And as a feminist Mzzzz Clinton believes in putting the government on the side of women and that women are our most precious resourse.

How about men? Where do we fit in this plan of hers?

Well sir,I can see you are an undecided voter so how about if I leave some pamphets with you.

No,I've decided not to vote for Hillary but you can leave the pamphets if you want.

(I'm about to close the door when this person says)

Sir,just for talking with us we have this gift for you.

It looks like a giant pea pod.

You could call it that,sir.

What am I supposed to do? Cook it?

Oh no,sir. All we ask is that you place it next to your bed.

Well,I guess I could do that.

Thank you for your time,sir and please keep Mzzz Clinton in mind.

(I close the door,place the pod next to my bed and come back to the computer)

Man,what am I going to write about?

(racks brain)

(yawn)

(racks brain even more)

(yawn)

(yawn)

Man,I can hardly keep my eyes open.

(yawn)

Maybe if I go to bed I can wake up refreshed and think of something to write.

Good night. Zzzzzzzzz

Labels:

Big tent...perhaps too big

It been said that the MRA community is a diverse group from the religious (whatever that religion would be),secular,misogynists,anti-misogynists,conservatives,liberals,moderates and militants. We've even seen an influx of women (whom we should be suspicious of) coming into the movement as well but why is this? I think brother Khank has the answer:

Khankrumthebulgar said:

Feminists openly acknowledge that Women are bailing on them.

March 09, 2007 11:09 AM

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11580877&postID=6816834878482102896

And not just women:

Anonymous said:

Eternal Batchelor, I am a MRA and proud of it - I hate feminism a hell of a lot. However, I am also bisexual [and midly transgendered] and I'm slightly worried about these homophobic elements that have been creeping into some MRA blogs recently.

4:00 AM

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=14979208&postID=5786940502623570485

Okay,so we can add gay,straight,bi and "transgendered" to the list.Will any of these people be able to form an cohesive unit to fight feminism effectively? I doubt it since things are too diverse. Diversity may be nice...but not in all cases.

Labels: ,

Shelf life

I've noticed that the shelf life for women is a lot different from that of men. Women tend to ripen at an earlier age but then again their beauty fades at an earlier age as well. To give some examples I've heard women in their 20's gush over older guys such as Tom Jones,Neil Diamond,Clint Eastwood and Harry Belefonte. I have yet to hear a guy say that Cloris Leechmen or Joan Rivers is hot. I saw Jane Seymour on tv the other day,man have her looks taken a dump as have Paula Abdul's. Paula Abdul recently tried to auction herself off on a date via the internet. There were no takers. If the internet had been around for mass consumption back in the '80's things might have been different for Abdul but then again she still had her looks and probably wouldn't have bothered with us internet geeks and instead would party with the bad boys during their most attractive years and when their looks fade they look for suckers nice guys who will take them in,along with any children and baggage they may have.

Men on the other hand,well we may take a little longer to mature physically but we shine for longer periods of time as the above examples show. Sure you may be unattractive to women now if you are a young man but as you mature you will see that you have the longer shelf life not the women so yes you may despair now but you will succeed later in life while women at that same age will not be so glamourous anymore. Think about it as that cheerleader who turned you down in high school now has her looks go to hell. Think about it and smile because you have a longer shelf life.

Labels:

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Dark side of prostitution-for men anyway

Perhaps one of the worst things for men concerning prostitution in the U.S. is accidently propositioning an undercover female cop and getting busted. This is the time it seems that every feminazi and mangina come out of the woodwork to shame your ass,possibly to coerce you to pay the fine (the reason they probably do this other than political ones),pay to get your car back and threaten to print you name in the paper. This is pretty fucked up,just to get a piece of ass. Serial killers,both accused and convicted,have gotten less harassment than johns do. It's pretty fucked up when you're busted instead of your nut. I would love to see some guy(s) fight this bullshit and clog up the court system and when they are interviewed by the press they have positive outlooks and say they are doing it for men's rights and they have become shameproof. I wonder what the femicunts and manginas are going to do then,probably pee in their panties as some real men stood up to them. The only places where prostitution is legal in the U.S. is certain counties in Nevada and even there I hear you pay up the ying yang. So if prostitution were so bad wouldn't it be illegal everywhere? Yes,it would.

I gone to shopping malls and seen cops,not security guards,but cops patrolling around. There is even a cop shop at one of the malls I've been in and I guess they are their to keep the troublemakers out. And on the other hand,there are vice cops arresting johns.

Women like to get thier gathering needs met so they go shopping. Men like to get their sexual needs met so they go to hookers.

So just where am I going with this?

Just here:

It seems that there is an army of cops out to make sure women get their needs met while making sure men don't get their's met and they call this a patriarchy? Bullshit.

Prostitution was legal back in the old west but then in 1910 some women's group,The Women's Temperance Union,who also made alcohol unconstitutional so that makes them 0-2,decided to illegalize prostitution and thus make men's lives a living hell for it and that is the situation we have today.

Labels:

Hi-welcome to my blog

On this board you can read my ramblings. Yes,they do have a militant edge to them and may come off as misogynistic to some but the way I see it is,did the feminists (or most women for that matter) ever complain about misandry? No,when they were running their mouths about it they were spreading it gleefully and have no problem with it,the last thing they would do is complain about it since they could use it to manipulate men into doing their bidding and they do this without a conscience or second thought. Hey,they didn't give a fuck about misandry so why should I give a fuck about misogyny. But hey,isn't that equality? Yep,sure is.

Labels: ,