Monday, August 24, 2009

Obama backstabs men and feminists theives do men in as well

Obama's betrayal of the working-class male

By Carey Roberts

It's no secret that men have been hit hard by the recession. From November 2007 to November 2008, the U.S. economy lost over 2 million jobs — 82% of those losses were male jobs and only 18% female jobs. The reason is because men are concentrated in the sectors devastated by the downturn: manufacturing and construction.

This employment gap prompted University of Michigan economist Mark Perry to dub the downturn a "man-cession in the lipstick economy."

So in his Inauguration speech, Barack Obama glowingly promised, "We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together."

Within days, the newly-installed president unveiled his stimulus proposal, vowing it would create millions of "shovel-ready" jobs. And on February 17, Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009.

That would get men back on the job and ready to rebuild the nation's infrastructure, persons assumed. And if you visit the government's ARRA website — recovery.gov — you'll see upbeat pictures of hard-hatted carpenters, energy-efficient courthouses, and gleaming hospitals.

But following passage of ARRA, unemployment continued to rise and the gender gap worsened. By May of this year, 10.5% of men, compared to eight percent of women, filled the ranks of the unemployed. That's the worst gender gap reported since 1948.

So where did the $787 billion economic stimulus package go wrong?

Part of the problem is the crass influence of pay-back politics. According to a July 8 USA Today report, counties that supported Obama in the November election received $69 per person, compared to $34 per capita in counties that voted Republican.

Another reason is the hefty outlay of stimulus money to state governments at the expense of local groups. "You don't fertilize a tree from the top down," quipped Democratic senator Tom Harkin of Iowa. "Too much of this is going to the top."

But far worse is the fact that the Obama Administration sold out to the feminists. Christina Hoff Sommers' recent exposé, "No Country for Burly Men," offers a stunning account of the legislative transmogrification: click here
As soon as Obama released his stimulus proposal, the National Organization for Women and other feminist groups swung into action. They knew the head of Obama's Council of Economic Advisors, Lawrence Summers, would be a push-over following the putsch at Harvard University.

So following a flurry of closed-door meetings, emails, petitions, and op-ed columns that derided Obama's "Macho Stimulus Plan," the White House staff set out to revamp the proposal. They released a report assuring that 42% of all jobs would go for females, openly admitting the new approach "skews job creation somewhat towards women."

When the final bill was signed into law, the feminists were ecstatic. NOW president Kim Gandy exulted how the law contained many of the "very specific proposals that we had made" with price tags carrying "numbers that started with a 'B' (as in billion)." And $325 million was allocated for family-busting domestic violence programs.

Less than four months later the Associated Press would report, "Most of the roughly $300 billion coming directly to the states is being funneled through existing government programs for health care, education, unemployment benefits, food stamps and other social services." In Georgia, two-thirds of the state government's stimulus money would pay social programs. In Mississippi, only 13% of the stimulus money is projected to go for road construction, according to the AP.

"We talked about 'shovel-ready' since September and assumed it was a whole lot of paving and building when, in fact, that's not the case," complained Chris Whatley of the Council of State Governments.

The irony is the male vote was a decisive factor in Obama's improbable quest to reach the White House. During the primary campaign, the white male vote propelled Obama to victory in 10 out of 17 states: www.renewamerica.com/columns/roberts/080624 . And last Nov. 4, males again played a crucial role, with 49% of men casting their vote for Obama, compared to 48% siding with McCain.

Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly believes the goal of the reverse discrimination that lards Obama's stimulus plan is to "make men, husbands, and fathers irrelevant as family providers." According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, over 7.5 million American males are now listed on the unemployment rolls. That's a lot of irrelevant men.

© Carey Roberts


Here was a plan to help the economy and these bitches just couldn't stay the fuck out of it. The economy is shit right now to begin with and these cunts just had to feed on the dying flesh that was once the American economy. Fucking feminist vultures.

Labels:

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Raped by Dr. Phil

Man-bashing psychologist Dr. Phil accused of sexual abuse!

By David Usher Aug 7, 2009


Sexual abuse claims that appear out of nowhere 25 years after the alleged abuse supposedly occurred against rich and famous men are impossible to aver — usually monetarily motivated — and a favorite con feminists apply to quickly elicit loads of hush money.

But this is one rare case we see no reason to investigate or defend.

Dr. Phil is a male-feminist psychologist who built an illegitimate empire improperly blaming men for women's feelings, problems, and personality disorders.

Unfortunately for Dr. Phil, being a shark does not protect him from being eaten alive by other sharks possessing the physical gender advantages he pretends to assume. Feminist women do not care which rich men they blackmail.

The man is getting what he truly deserves — a large dose of his own poison patent medicine. Perhaps this will jolt him to reality? If not, let the shadenfreude roll!


"DR. PHIL SEXUALLY ABUSED ME!"

"Dr. Phil is a monster!" Those are the angry words of a former patient of Dr. Phil McGraw, who is revealing the shocking story of the sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of the TV shrink!

Sara Morrison is speaking out in a world-exclusive ENQUIRER interview - divulging sickening details of how talk-show titan Oprah Winfrey's former protege repeatedly fondled her, sexually abusing her while she was being treated by him.

The 44-year-old mother of one also reveals authorities were called in to investigate the abuse, threatening Dr. Phil's career as a psychologist and his marriage to wife Robin, who was outraged by the charges.

"Not a single day has gone by when I haven't been affected by what Phil McGraw did to me," Sara told The ENQUIRER.

"He profoundly affected the course of my life. The world should know this man is a predator and a bully. He shouldn't be telling Americans how to live their lives, how to improve themselves."

Sara was a college sophomore home for the summer when she sought treatment from Dr. Phil in Wichita Falls, Texas, in 1984.

"I suffered from low self-esteem, and Iwas depressed, lonely and suicidal," recalled Sara. "Phil was extremely insistent that I call him all the time, and he would call me.

"He wanted to see me three or four times a week - as a patient."

While treating her that summer, Dr. Phil did nothing improper, she says. But his attitude changed completely the following summer when, in a highly unethical move, he paid Sara to work as his intern, while charging her as a patient at the same time.

"The first day I showed up for work, Phil had his hands all over me," she recalled.

At the time, the then 34-year-old psychologist and his second wife Robin had been married for eight years, but that didn't stop his sexually aggressive behavior, Sara said.

"Phil would pull me down to sit in his lap while he talked on the phone to patients, other doctors, even his wife! He'd be running his hand up and down the inside of my thigh all the way up to my panties."

For the full shocking story pick up the new ENQUIRER - now on sale!


Source:here and here

Saturday, August 1, 2009

A mangina on women

This is from some asshat who goes by the handle,"notworthit". I wouldn't be surprised if some woman gave him that handle and not just as a screen name:

Women are more important than men and we are more expendable. They are smarter and they also are responsible for reproduction. We don't carry that burden. Notice how much better girls do in school now that their potential has been realized. If we don't wise up and realize they are better than us, then the so called men haters will never like us. Come to reality, women are better than men. Look at your daughter why is it she is so much smarter than your son?

See if a single woman disagrees. Only insecure men get angry and fight about it. That shows you something. I am a man that is willing to admit it. Too bad more aren't so willing. The world would be a better place.


Source:here

Of course there's this:

Look at all the damage men have done to the world what is wrong with handing the power over to the better sex? Most men are not successful without a woman but a woman can succeed without a man despite the disadvantages they have. Why do girls score higher in school and are more likely to have a college degree? So tell me how women are no superior.

Source:here

Let's rip apart his arguements:

Women are more important than men and we are more expendable. They are smarter and they also are responsible for reproduction. We don't carry that burden. Notice how much better girls do in school now that their potential has been realized. If we don't wise up and realize they are better than us, then the so called men haters will never like us.

How are women more important than men? It takes a supercomputer to put replace a man but only blow up plastic to replace a woman. Can women reproduce independently of a man? (sperm donations still require a man) Men carry the financial burden whether they want to or not. Manginas like you gave women all the power. They do better because of lies furthered by feminists and manginas,such as yourself. Man haters love men just as nazis love jews.

See if a single woman disagrees. Only insecure men get angry and fight about it.

Because it fits their "blame men for every damn thing" when in reality if it weren't for males,especially white males she would be fighting coyotes for her food. One of us is insecure and it's not me junior. I'm quite comfortable in my masculinity.I'll bet your not and must appease feminists at all costs.

Labels:

Confessions of a user of men

OK. Time to put men out of your misery. Feminism was and is the biggest con in history. We talked endlessly about "equality" yet that was the last thing we wanted. You men have yet to realise that women never say what we mean. It is always shrouded in hyperbole and imagery.

So now, we are so close to having our cake and eating it. Here are just a few examples.

1) We can take you to the cleaners in divorce. No suggestion of equality there. We can have affairs and divorce you and we STILL get the house and maintenance for as long as we need. There is now absolutely no risk in a woman filing for divorce. You men don't even have the right to shag us any more. More and more women are making their husbands live celebate lives in marriage. Once we have that ring on our finger we rule! I am only 27. I have been married three times. Each one I stayed with for three years and then took for every penny I could get. You see, we only have to convince a judge of "irretreivable breakdown" of the relationship. And how is that determined? Easy. When ONE party does not wish the relationship to continue. My current husband needs another year I would say. The business he has built up is not quite where I need it to be yet. When it is, he will go the same way as the others. The house is already mine "for tazx reasons". At least thats what he thinks. I "allowed" my name to be put on the deeds, but he will find come the day that this just means the house is mine already. I tend to go for cash settlements with regard to maintenance which leaves me free to start again. Not that I need to now. By the time I have ditched this poor sap, I will have more than enough to live a very good lifestyle with for the rest of my life. Even if money starts to run short I can always do it again. It's not as if I have to have sex much either. I pick men who are on the way up building their buisnesses. The hours they put in mean they are usually too tired and if they have affairs with their secretaries, well, that just makes it easier for me.

2) We get far less severe prison sentences for the same crimes. We can even murder our new born children and it is written off as Post Natal Depression. Women's groups all over the world are working for the day when no woman will ever be sent to prison for any crime. ANd trust me, that day will come.

3) In the work place not only do we get paid for taking time off to have children, but now we even get pay rises while we are off, an absolute right in law to return to the job we left and in some cases now, we even get promoted while we are on leave. Employers have to invest in our training, but we are free to screw them over by taking all the training and qualifications we can get of of them and then leaving.

4) We now have senior politicians who advocate "positive descrimination" . In other words, if you are a white male, you are where you belong. At the bottom of the heap. Women are eased into top jobs and ministerial positions in Government. The Sisterhood is alive and well and working beautifully. The Labour Government, always breathtakingly stupid has actually gone as far as prohibiting the selection of male candidates in some wards. Fantastic.

And you poor men. What can one say? All you need is a little show of panty now and then and you are putty in our hands. You and you alone have allowed us to take this supremecy and you have done so without a whimper. When I joined the feminist movement, I didnt really buy into the more vitriolic mantras of "all men are pigs" and "the only good man is a doormat", but now I see you for what you are. A means of providing what I want.


Source:here

Labels: