Thursday, October 31, 2013

Let's go to Asia instead

Former heads of state urge EU to outlaw anti-feminism

Europe, October 28, 2013 By Robert O'Hara

Earlier this month in Rome a council comprised of former European heads of state called on the European Parliament to establish national surveillance units to monitor citizens suspected of anti-feminist leanings.

The European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR), a “tolerance watchdog”, which includes former presidents of the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Albania, Latvia, and Cyprus, and former prime ministers of Spain and Sweden, made the proposal in a report delivered during a 45-minute speech to the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties (LIBE).

The proposal, titled the Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance calls for “concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.”

Notice "sexism is not on the list. (sarcasm)I wonder why.(/sarcasm)

These “special administrative units,” the report says, “should preferably operate within the Ministry of Justice.”

“There is no need to be tolerant to the intolerant,” it states, especially “as far as freedom of expression is concerned.”

It also calls for actual criminal sanctions to be levied against offenders.

Congratulations. You have just eliminated basic freedoms and the economy of United Europe in one piece of legislation. Swift move.

European Dignity Watch, a civil rights watchdog group based in Brussels, has warned that this directive “aims to impose governmental control over the social and economic behavior of citizens in the widest possible sense.”

In a scathing critique, the group says that the ECTR Framework’s basic principles are flawed and that it “interferes in an unprecedented manner with citizens’ freedom and rights” and “distorts the concepts of ‘justice’ and ‘equality’.”

Finally some common sense at the end. Europe doesn't look too male friendly right now.


Sunday, October 20, 2013

Anti-male article from Time magazine

One of the most pernicious biases in the media is the bias against men. Time today published a piece by Jeffrey Kluger titled: “Women Make Better Doctors Than Men.”

In a new report released by the University of Montreal, investigators found that women outperformed men on certain metrics of patient care.

Kluger suggests, ironically, that the difference may be due to some of the oldest stereotypes of the sexes.

It’s possible the female doctors were simply more willing to devote more time to their patients.

No fear, though, because no anti-male, sexist article can be complete with out a bit of ageism thrown in for good measure.

…there’s hope for improvement. The younger the doctors in their study were, the narrower the divide between the sexes, suggesting that hurry-up male doctors are aging out of the system, being replaced by a newer, gentler generation.

One need not wonder whether a similar story might have appeared in Time had the results been inverted. A quick search of the Time online archives reveals the following titles:

"Women at the Auto Repair Shop: Better at Haggling, Yet More Likely to Get Ripped Off" – a piece that celebrates women for being good at shopping, and then blames men for their failure to protect themselves from being ripped off.

"Do Women Make Better Traders than Men?"

"What Stereotype? Women Are Better Than Men at Parking, Study Finds"

"Why Women Are Better at Everything"

"Study: Women Better at Using Social Media to Keep in Touch"

"Survey: Women More Satisfied With the College Experience"

All of these titles return on the first page of results. The search criteria: men better than women!

Not surprisingly, there were no exact returns for that criteria.

Source: click here

More bullshit at Crime uh er Time Magazine. Watch them become irrelevant. The same irrelevancy that the New York Times was looking at. In fact it got so bad at the NYT that they had to actually print genuine news stories without the usual liberal bias. They were looking at their finances going into the red. The same will happen with Time Magazine: it's either sink or swim.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

A Voice For Men at Queen's Park in Toranto

I'd like to turn this back on the feminists: We hear your here,we hear you're queer now how about you disappear.