There is an old saying,"all is fair in war and love" or is it? It seems that the rape of women is considered "war crimes" but castration and other crimes against men are not. Does this take into consideration that the females in question may also be combatants? If it does then doesn't it handicap you in a time of war to limit yourself while an enemy is not only allowed to use every weapon in her disposal but encouraged to do so. Under such conditions wouldn't it also benefit men to update their thinking upon engaging women today and throw out the old rule book since it is a detriment today. Perhaps "rape" rethought would show some justifiable uses for it,such as in war upon a female adversary. Women point out that vaginal and possible anal rape hurt tremendously pointing out that it would be a very effective weapon and since women don't limit themselves why should we? I can honestly say that the only WWII nation to have it right was the Soviet Union as they gave as good as they got and returned the favor to Germany. I was watching one of the Death Wish series movies and I noticed that the good guys don't rape female combatants while the enemy raped their women. The only thing it demonstrated to me was that the the so-called "good guys" are actually ball less wonders who were afraid of exploiting an advantage or returning the favor and visiting justice upon the enemy. Has removing the rapist from his natural environment caused other changes? Yes it has. Removing the rapist from his natural habitat has caused an even more uppity attitude in women.
As we can see those who try to thwart the rapists are the chivilaristic. Chivalry is an old outdated custom that has to become part of the scrapheap of the past. Chivalry is a practice that is killing the western nations and is encroaching upon the eastern world with help from the U.N.. Women outnumber men and women outlive men so the notion of chivalry is definitely outdated. Chivalry must be stamped out world wide for men to thrive,which we should be allowed considering we are the ones that built western civilizations. In course of every civilization there occurs change,in fact change is the only constant in the universe. In the changes of that society things that people took for granted are reexamined and possibly recatorgorized. Why not have "rape" be one of them? Rape sounds like an excellent means of subduing an female enemy but can it legally be done during peacetime in a domestic (as opposed to foreign) situation? Yes,in what I term "justifiable rape". "Justifiable rape"
can occur if the man were cock teased into sex and the woman at the last minute changes her mind "justifiable rape" would be allowed. Men who have been humiliated by women would also have this on their side as well. "Justifiable rape" laws would go a long way to evening out the scales of justice.
7 comments:
I don't think that rape is a method of subduing an female enemy as the feminists claim. On the contrary, the females are the spils of war, not the enemy combatants. The right to breed the females has always been a goal of warfare from the smallest primitive tribes to major armed conflicts. Ghenges Khan is said to have taken the best female from every city he conquered, and so he ended up with several hundred wives. Moses divided young females of conquered cities between his soldiers and being sold as sex slaves by the church.
The females have never really objected either. A female's children have a better evolutionary chance if their father is a conquering hero than if she mates with a loser wimp. Given a choice she's almost always breed the hero's kids. Maybe that's "rape." The lesbian feminists think so. But the females getting laid by conquering heros aren't usually screaming in pain. Its a biological advantage for her children and she's attracted to strong men.
As far as "rape" of a female who uses the fiction of "maybe sex" to extorte "free" dinner and entertainment or other gifts from a man has no complaint if he collects on her false promise. If she doesn't want to get laid she shouldn't be using an expressed or implied promise of sex to acquire benefits. Celtic law on "rape" held that a female who went willingly to a man's bed wasn't "raped" even if she cried out later. It was only "rape" if she was grabbed off the street and dragged to his bed. I think that was a better law than the feminist nonsense we have today.
The real intention of the Rape card played by Feminists is to make Men out to be Monsters. Femnags intent is to Divide and Conquer. Divide the Genders by creating suspicion. And to then drive women into the Arms of a willing and enabling Lesbian.
We now have Rape Laws declaring that when a Woman consumes Alcohol she cannot consent to Sex. This is an outrage. But it is the Law. In Several States. Rape is used as a weapon to attack Men. To keep us in our place. And the alcohol industry is in one it. Selling out their fellow man. For money.
And while it is true that there are Men who do Rape Women. And some of these Rapes are violent, even brutal (Aggravation Rape), others blur the line between consent and clumsy too persistent seduction.
Stop the inanity!
Feminism is an anti-men hate campaign. Whatever feminists are for, men should be against. Whatever feminists are against, men should be for. Feminists are against rape. Enough said.
"Celtic law on "rape" held that a female who went willingly to a man's bed wasn't "raped" even if she cried out later. It was only "rape" if she was grabbed off the street and dragged to his bed. I think that was a better law than the feminist nonsense we have today."
He shouldn't be punished for that either. He's taking a bold move at the very least, better then anything modern men would do. If she's not a whore maybe he just keep the girl after raping her. That will be his prize.
I wonder how much it matters if a female gets screwed? How valuable is her pussy in these days of overpopulation? Does it really matter if her feelings are hurt because some man humped her pathetic cunt?
Feminism figures that females are hugely important, and men are worthless scum. WRONG! Men are valuable citizens and cunts are useful breeders of little value. If a cunt is crying becuase some man pounded her pussy, tell her to shut up and deal with it. She's just a cunt. It's not a big deal.
Cathy Young of Reason Magazine has written an excellent piece entitled. Feminist Rape Hysteria. She points out that the Rape Accusation has become a Weapon to attack Men with and to destroy their reputations. Effectively it is a legal castration of Men. Just the accusation is enough to ruin careers, and Men's Lives.
That the level of False Rape Accusations is so great is evidence of how it is being misused. The Recent Conference on Domestic Violence in California re enforces my belief that the Domestic Violence Issue is a funding mechanism.
Feminists must continue to sow discord and fear to Women. To create mistrust and hatred of Men.
That is the real goal here. That the lines of seduction and Rape have become blurred is Proof Per Se, that the current Legal and Societal Definition of Rape must be revisited and reality reintroduced into the Debate. Men must step and speak up for themselves.
Cathy Young of Reason Magazine has written an excellent piece entitled. Feminist Rape Hysteria. She points out that the Rape Accusation has become a Weapon to attack Men with and to destroy their reputations. Effectively it is a legal castration of Men. Just the accusation is enough to ruin careers, and Men's Lives.
That the level of False Rape Accusations is so great is evidence of how it is being misused. The Recent Conference on Domestic Violence in California re enforces my belief that the Domestic Violence Issue is a funding mechanism.
Feminists must continue to sow discord and fear to Women. To create mistrust and hatred of Men.
That is the real goal here. That the lines of seduction and Rape have become blurred is Proof Per Se, that the current Legal and Societal Definition of Rape must be revisited and reality reintroduced into the Debate. Men must step and speak up for themselves.
Post a Comment