SB 967 has been amended again. I will give you the good,the bad and the ugly about these amendments:
The good: this amendment lost a sponsor and the word "women" was crossed out. The accuser can no longer be exempt from the anti-drinking rules on campuses.
The bad: it is more misandric allowing for more privileges given to women at the expense of men including third party reporting.
The ugly:a third party can turn you in on a sexaul assault,domestic violence and/or stalking complaint on and off campus. That's right. If this passes your college is no longer an institute for higher learning but a feminist inquisition out to crucify men for their alleged action(s)-regardless of where they took place. Just think: someone who doesn't like you can now swear out a complaint about you or they can do it just to be sadistic.
The rest of the amendment was just a semantic shell game and a waste of California tax dollars. I wonder how they feel about that.
This bitch is going to the Assembly Committee on Higher Education so let's let the Assembly members know where we stand.