Definitions

There have been a lot of definitions to MRA's,PUA's,MGTOWers,Masculinists and Masculists and they have been mutually exclusive. But what if they are not. What if they are not mutually exclusive but in fact stages. I believe that true MRA's (those that avoid feminism and leave the admin duties and editorial policy to the MEN there) and Masculinists/Masculists can get along. There are the pro-feminist stooges but they are not part of this discussion. Certainly both groups can combat misandry in the cultural and legal arenas of their respective societies. Certainly a lot of PUA's have adopted MRA/Masculinist tactics in standing up to women and chellenging them. A lot of guys before the PUA thing just played it nice. While it may be true that PUA's are avoiding the political arena it is also true that a lot of MRA's/Masculinists/Masculists have used PUA tactics to get women. MGTOWers may have or have not,depends. I believe they would be the last group to use PUA tactics but if they wanted to they would employ them. I'm not saying PUA's are the supreme way to go far from it but those tactics are used. If a PUA gets tired of the shallow bar scene and a lot of them do they may either become MGTOWers or MRA's/Masculinists/Masculists. If they want to make a difference on all levels: cultural,legal,social and societial in general then they'll embrace the latter definition. These are the various stages of the manosphere.