Ms. magazine is having a campaign to expand the definitions of rape and they lobbying the FBI and the US Attorney General to get them to expand the definition of "rape". Currently both agencies use "forcible rape" as the definition of "rape" which makes sense. The feminists are trying to change the definition to inflate the rape rate and make it sound like a bigger deal than it actually is. If they can get these agencies to expand the definition of "rape" to include a woman regretting her decision to have consensual sex,the woman is too drunk to give consent (who is going to define "too drunk" and how do we define it? Is one sip "too drunk"? Is half a cup? Slippery slope) and/or when the woman retracts consent in the middle of sex and the man takes a nanosecond too long withdrawing. They want to include these things as "rape" too. The reason they are doing this is too inflate the rape numbers and make it sound more widespread than it actually is. That is why we should counterattack and tell these agencies the truth about what the feminists are up to. The FBI cannot be contacted by email but the Attorney General can so when sending email to him let him know that these are the games feminists play. The faster we counteract the feminists the better so don't delay act today.
(UPDATE-Anonymous posted this and it deserves front page attention):
According to this source,
Myths about female sex ofenders
the FBI does not count *any* sexual assault on a man as rape:
"•Carnal knowledge is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th ed. as “the act of a man having sexual bodily connections with a woman; sexual intercourse.” There is carnal knowledge if there is the slightest penetration of the sexual organ of the female (vagina) by the sexual organ of the male (penis).
•Agencies must not classify statutory rape, incest, or other sex offenses, i.e. forcible sodomy, sexual assault with an object, forcible fondling, etc. as Forcible Rape
•By definition, sexual attacks on males are excluded from the rape category and must be classified as assaults or other sex offenses depending on the nature of the crime and the extent of injury."
Maybe we *should* insist that the defintion of "forcible rape" should be expanded to include women raping men, such as female caregivers attacking toddlers, and also men getting raped in prison.
Be careful what you wish for. ladies, you might get more than you bargained for.
6 comments:
According to this source,
http://www.articlesaboutmen.com/2010/09/top-ten-myths-about-female-sex-offenders-911/
the FBI does not count *any* sexual assault on a man as rape:
"•Carnal knowledge is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th ed. as “the act of a man having sexual bodily connections with a woman; sexual intercourse.” There is carnal knowledge if there is the slightest penetration of the sexual organ of the female (vagina) by the sexual organ of the male (penis).
•Agencies must not classify statutory rape, incest, or other sex offenses, i.e. forcible sodomy, sexual assault with an object, forcible fondling, etc. as Forcible Rape
•By definition, sexual attacks on males are excluded from the rape category and must be classified as assaults or other sex offenses depending on the nature of the crime and the extent of injury."
Maybe we *should* insist that the defintion of "forcible rape" should be expanded to include women raping men, such as female caregivers attacking toddlers, and also men getting raped in prison.
Be careful what you wish for. ladies, you might get more than you bargained for.
Dude that is excellent,I'm giving it front page attention.
A counterattack is a military battlefield tactic used by some or all of a defending force against their attackers.
A counterattack is a military battlefield tactic used by some or all of a defending force against their attackers.
Yes it is,we taking measures to defend ourrselves from feminist attack because the expanding defintion of "rape" is going to hurt a lot of men so that is why we are taking these steps.
Isn’t it nice? According to the FBI's new definition of rape, if a woman shoves her tongue inside a man’s urethra, or slightly penetrates his rectum while licking his ass, she is a rapist!?
Has no woman ever tried to shove her finger inside your ass hole without getting written consent beforehand? and she got her finger in 1/32th of an inch before you managed to protest? Well, she is a rapist. And if she did not do it, just allege she did.
And, did you, as a man, never orgasm and the women continued riding you against your explicit protests? Well, she raped you.
And a man alleging any such act without any proof will avail himself of rape shield laws?
And if accused of rape by a woman, he can counter-sue and claim she has tongue-raped him?
Or is it just me who thinks that the law will NOT be interpreted in favor of men. Never!?
I believe that they will be interpretted in a gender neutral way if:
1. Men are vigilant and attack misandry mercilessly,whether vocal or written. Especially if that misandry is written in bills to be considered.
2. Keeping misandrists out of power. Keep them out of both sectors of society,public and private.
Otherwise,forget it.
Post a Comment