Saturday, December 28, 2019
Friday, December 27, 2019
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
Women drugging men and robbing them
NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) - A Wilbraham, MA, resident is now the fifth man to confirm to News4 Investigates that he was drugged in downtown Nashville this year.
A police report narrative obtained by News4 Investigates shows the first indication of what has long been rumored: that men claim they were ro…
John Walsh Jr. filed a police report claiming on Nov. 19 he, his son and nephew were having drinks at The Diner on Third Avenue South.
After his son and nephew decided to go to a hookah bar, Walsh said he struck up a conversation with an unknown woman and had his third drink of the night. The next morning, he awoke in the Metro jail.
“The most devastating thing that's happened in my life,” Walsh said.
Walsh said he remembers nothing between that last drink at The Diner and waking up in the jail that morning.
“Around 1:00 in the morning, I have no memory from there,” Walsh said.
He would later learn that he was found asleep in a chair in a hotel miles away from where he was staying.
When police arrived, they described him as smelling of alcohol and could not form coherent sentences and took him to jail on a charge of public intoxication.
Walsh said when his son and nephew returned that morning, the door to the room where he was staying was closed, so they believed he was sleeping.
He called his son and explain that he needed to be picked up, and then filed a police report claiming he had been drugged.
News4 Investigates asked him the question you may be wondering yourself.
“Is it possibly you had too much to drink and someone took advantage of you?” asked News4 Investigates.
“Absolutely not. Never in my life. I don’t do drugs, and I don't drink to black out,” Walsh said.
Walsh said his debit and credit card, along with at least $500 and his phone were all stolen. Walsh provided a screen grab that shows how he was able to track his stolen phone, which traveled from Bordeaux to Murfreesboro and, at one point, back to downtown Nashville.
Metro Police Central Precinct Commander Gordon Howey confirmed to News4 Investigates that they believe women are targeting men downtown.
“These women know they've got a pretty good place to go hunting,” Howey said.
Howey said they believe unrelated groups of women, come coming from as far as Wisconsin and Minnesota, are traveling to downtown Nashville to find men who are out drinking, drug them and then rob them.
“Men are being targeted by women,” Howey said.
Howey said while police have been able to arrest women for stealing from men after a night of drinking, they have not yet been able to charge them with drugging them. Part of the problem, Howey said, is that men are failing to go to the hospital to get blood tests to confirm their suspicions. Walsh said he feels that’s exactly what police should have done: taken him to the hospital instead of the jail.
“I feel totally violated - in many ways. I feel law enforcement failed me,” Walsh said.
Howey said in Walsh’s case, which is further detailed in the police report, officers found him asleep with blood shot eyes, smelling of alcohol and unable to former coherent sentences, which was why he was taken to jail.
Howey said if Walsh had a medical condition, he would have been taken to the hospital. Howey did say, however, that the staff of The Diner had provided video from inside the bar that could aid in catching the person responsible.
Source
A police report narrative obtained by News4 Investigates shows the first indication of what has long been rumored: that men claim they were ro…
John Walsh Jr. filed a police report claiming on Nov. 19 he, his son and nephew were having drinks at The Diner on Third Avenue South.
After his son and nephew decided to go to a hookah bar, Walsh said he struck up a conversation with an unknown woman and had his third drink of the night. The next morning, he awoke in the Metro jail.
“The most devastating thing that's happened in my life,” Walsh said.
Walsh said he remembers nothing between that last drink at The Diner and waking up in the jail that morning.
“Around 1:00 in the morning, I have no memory from there,” Walsh said.
He would later learn that he was found asleep in a chair in a hotel miles away from where he was staying.
When police arrived, they described him as smelling of alcohol and could not form coherent sentences and took him to jail on a charge of public intoxication.
Walsh said when his son and nephew returned that morning, the door to the room where he was staying was closed, so they believed he was sleeping.
He called his son and explain that he needed to be picked up, and then filed a police report claiming he had been drugged.
News4 Investigates asked him the question you may be wondering yourself.
“Is it possibly you had too much to drink and someone took advantage of you?” asked News4 Investigates.
“Absolutely not. Never in my life. I don’t do drugs, and I don't drink to black out,” Walsh said.
Walsh said his debit and credit card, along with at least $500 and his phone were all stolen. Walsh provided a screen grab that shows how he was able to track his stolen phone, which traveled from Bordeaux to Murfreesboro and, at one point, back to downtown Nashville.
Metro Police Central Precinct Commander Gordon Howey confirmed to News4 Investigates that they believe women are targeting men downtown.
“These women know they've got a pretty good place to go hunting,” Howey said.
Howey said they believe unrelated groups of women, come coming from as far as Wisconsin and Minnesota, are traveling to downtown Nashville to find men who are out drinking, drug them and then rob them.
“Men are being targeted by women,” Howey said.
Howey said while police have been able to arrest women for stealing from men after a night of drinking, they have not yet been able to charge them with drugging them. Part of the problem, Howey said, is that men are failing to go to the hospital to get blood tests to confirm their suspicions. Walsh said he feels that’s exactly what police should have done: taken him to the hospital instead of the jail.
“I feel totally violated - in many ways. I feel law enforcement failed me,” Walsh said.
Howey said in Walsh’s case, which is further detailed in the police report, officers found him asleep with blood shot eyes, smelling of alcohol and unable to former coherent sentences, which was why he was taken to jail.
Howey said if Walsh had a medical condition, he would have been taken to the hospital. Howey did say, however, that the staff of The Diner had provided video from inside the bar that could aid in catching the person responsible.
Source
Women who rape men
Writing in Time, Cathy Young notices something interesting in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention figures on rape: Women rape a lot more than people think..
If the CDC figures are to be taken at face value, then we must also conclude that, far from being a product of patriarchal violence against women, " rape culture " is a two-way street, with plenty of female perpetrators and male victims.
How could that be? After all, very few men in the CDC study were classified as victims of rape: 1.7% in their lifetime, and too few for a reliable estimate in the past year. But these numbers refer only to men who have been forced into anal sex or made to perform oral sex on another male. Nearly 7% of men, however, reported that at some point in their lives, they were "made to penetrate" another person — usually in reference to vaginal intercourse, receiving oral sex, or performing oral sex on a woman. This was not classified as rape, but as "other sexual violence." And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being "made to penetrate" — either by physical force or due to intoxication — at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1% in 2010, and 1.7% and 1.6% respectively in 2011).
In short, men are raped by women at nearly the same rate women are raped by men.
According to a recent study from the University of Missouri, published by the American Psychological Association, male victims of sexual assault are often victimized by women: "A total of 43% of high school boys and young college men reported they had an unwanted sexual experience and of those, 95% said a female acquaintance was the aggressor, according to a study published online in the APA journal Psychology of Men and Masculinity."
This shouldn't be so surprising. Back in the old days, when talk of "rape" or "sexual assault" generally meant forcible penetration at the hands of a stranger, rape was unsurprisingly pretty much a male-committed crime.
But feminists pushed for a broader definition of rape, going beyond what Susan Estrich, in a very influential book, derisively called Real Rape, to encompass other forms of sexual coercion and intimidation. And so now the term "rape" as it is commonly used encompasses things like "date rape," sex while a partner is intoxicated, sex without prior verbal consent and even — at Ohio State University, at least — sex where both partners consent, but for different reasons.
Unsurprisingly, when the definition of rape — or, as it's often now called in order to provide less clarity, "sexual assault" — expands to include a lot more than behavior distinguished by superior physical strength, the incidence of rape goes up, and behavior engaged in by women is more likely to be included in the definition. (At juvenile detention centers nine out of 10 reporters of sexual assault are males victimized by female staffers.)
Thus, as Young points out, the CDC finds that men make up over a third of the victims of "sexual coercion," which can include such things as "lies or false promises, threats to end a relationship or spread negative gossip, or 'making repeated requests' for sex and expressing unhappiness at being turned down."
Students and staff protest against sexual violence.
Critics tend to dismiss these as trivial, suggesting that the men involved should just "man up." But, of course, there's no reason to think that such coercion is any more trivial where men are concerned than where women are concerned, unless you believe that women are such fragile flowers that they cannot possibly withstand things that men are supposed to ignore.
It will be interesting to see how college disciplinary boards handle this. If, in light of the data, women exhibit a similar predilection for sexual misbehavior to men, then surely the colleges should be punishing roughly as many women as men for such conduct. If they are not, the only possible explanation is some form of institutional sexism. That should be good news for Title IX attorneys, at any rate.
Finally, all this talk of rape on campus must be making college enrollment officers — already having trouble filling seats — even more nervous. Telling female students that they have a one-in-five chance of being raped (even if it's not true) isn't going to make them, or their parents, more likely to spend six-figure sums sending them to college. It might even push them toward online alternatives, as a YouTube parody video suggests.
With rape rates actually falling sharply, the current moral panic over campus rape seems more like political agitprop and mass hysteria than anything else. Like all such, this, too, will pass. But it will also do damage along the way. May reason assert itself sooner, rather than later.
Source
If the CDC figures are to be taken at face value, then we must also conclude that, far from being a product of patriarchal violence against women, " rape culture " is a two-way street, with plenty of female perpetrators and male victims.
How could that be? After all, very few men in the CDC study were classified as victims of rape: 1.7% in their lifetime, and too few for a reliable estimate in the past year. But these numbers refer only to men who have been forced into anal sex or made to perform oral sex on another male. Nearly 7% of men, however, reported that at some point in their lives, they were "made to penetrate" another person — usually in reference to vaginal intercourse, receiving oral sex, or performing oral sex on a woman. This was not classified as rape, but as "other sexual violence." And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being "made to penetrate" — either by physical force or due to intoxication — at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1% in 2010, and 1.7% and 1.6% respectively in 2011).
In short, men are raped by women at nearly the same rate women are raped by men.
According to a recent study from the University of Missouri, published by the American Psychological Association, male victims of sexual assault are often victimized by women: "A total of 43% of high school boys and young college men reported they had an unwanted sexual experience and of those, 95% said a female acquaintance was the aggressor, according to a study published online in the APA journal Psychology of Men and Masculinity."
This shouldn't be so surprising. Back in the old days, when talk of "rape" or "sexual assault" generally meant forcible penetration at the hands of a stranger, rape was unsurprisingly pretty much a male-committed crime.
But feminists pushed for a broader definition of rape, going beyond what Susan Estrich, in a very influential book, derisively called Real Rape, to encompass other forms of sexual coercion and intimidation. And so now the term "rape" as it is commonly used encompasses things like "date rape," sex while a partner is intoxicated, sex without prior verbal consent and even — at Ohio State University, at least — sex where both partners consent, but for different reasons.
Unsurprisingly, when the definition of rape — or, as it's often now called in order to provide less clarity, "sexual assault" — expands to include a lot more than behavior distinguished by superior physical strength, the incidence of rape goes up, and behavior engaged in by women is more likely to be included in the definition. (At juvenile detention centers nine out of 10 reporters of sexual assault are males victimized by female staffers.)
Thus, as Young points out, the CDC finds that men make up over a third of the victims of "sexual coercion," which can include such things as "lies or false promises, threats to end a relationship or spread negative gossip, or 'making repeated requests' for sex and expressing unhappiness at being turned down."
Students and staff protest against sexual violence.
Critics tend to dismiss these as trivial, suggesting that the men involved should just "man up." But, of course, there's no reason to think that such coercion is any more trivial where men are concerned than where women are concerned, unless you believe that women are such fragile flowers that they cannot possibly withstand things that men are supposed to ignore.
It will be interesting to see how college disciplinary boards handle this. If, in light of the data, women exhibit a similar predilection for sexual misbehavior to men, then surely the colleges should be punishing roughly as many women as men for such conduct. If they are not, the only possible explanation is some form of institutional sexism. That should be good news for Title IX attorneys, at any rate.
Finally, all this talk of rape on campus must be making college enrollment officers — already having trouble filling seats — even more nervous. Telling female students that they have a one-in-five chance of being raped (even if it's not true) isn't going to make them, or their parents, more likely to spend six-figure sums sending them to college. It might even push them toward online alternatives, as a YouTube parody video suggests.
With rape rates actually falling sharply, the current moral panic over campus rape seems more like political agitprop and mass hysteria than anything else. Like all such, this, too, will pass. But it will also do damage along the way. May reason assert itself sooner, rather than later.
Source
Sunday, November 3, 2019
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Woman exploits vulnerable men to commit suicide
'I would consider suicide if she would take herself with me': Victim tells of humiliation by teenage 'Poison Ivy', 17, who bullies 'weak' men into degrading themselves online before encouraging them to kill themselves
New Zealand teen Hanna, or 'Poison Ivy, grooms unstable men online
Lures 'socially awkward guys' into sexually degrading themselves
Hanna, 17, later entices the vulnerable men to commit suicide claim some of her followers
YouTube video has surfaced calling for victims to report Hanna
Her Twitter is flooded with photos from men declaring their love
One lover exclusively said he would consider suicide if she did the same
Do you know who Poison Ivy is? Email nelson.groom@mailonline.com
By NELSON GROOM FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA and PADDY DINHAM FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 09:48 EDT, 25 October 2016 | UPDATED: 22:51 EDT, 27 October 2016
A woman known as 'Poison Ivy' is grooming unstable men into sexually degrading themselves online before enticing them to commit suicide, it has been claimed.
Hanna, 17, from New Zealand, reportedly seeks vulnerable men in online gaming communities before 'bullying' them into sexually humiliating themselves in the public eye.
A chilling YouTube video has surfaced shedding light on Hanna's seemingly sinister activities and calling for victims to put an end to the abuse.
Hanna, 17, finds vulnerable men in online gaming communities before blackmailing them into humiliating themselves sexually
Hanna later encourages her vulnerable victims to commit suicide, it has been claimed by some men +13
Hanna later encourages her vulnerable victims to commit suicide, it has been claimed by some men
The clip claims: 'She encourages guys to do disgusting acts, via webcam on a live screen, like showing their genitals, spreading their butt cheeks on camera and sticking objects up their a**.'
He said the teenager chooses 'weak, socially awkward guys who have never had a girlfriend or a social life' before luring them into debasing themselves.
The YouTube video, uploaded by user MarsRPG, claims her goal is for her victims to 'kill themselves for her as an act of love.'
'This girl will not stop until these guys kill themselves. She grooms them for months. We need to report her,' he says.
Hanna's Twitter bio reads: 'I treat all men like s*** because they are weak and they deserve it. I bully the weak to make them weaker as I simultaneously grow stronger.'
Her account, which has over 900 followers, is flooded with images of men around the world declaring their love for her.
Her Twitter accounts is flooded with images and footage of men around the world declaring their love for her
A YouTube user has claimed Hanna seeks 'weak, socially awkward guys who have never had a girlfriend or a social life' before luring them into degrading themselves
Many of the men appear emotionally unstable, bursting into tears while begging for forgiveness
She also convinced one man to shave off his hair and eyebrows
Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, one of her lovers said he has no problem sharing her with other men, despite the fact she punishes them for talking to other girls.
Her grip on the man, from Corpus Christi, Texas, is so strong that he said he would actually think about killing himself if she was to do the same.
'I would consider suicide if she would take herself with me,' he said.
He added: 'We basically share her. I'm OK with it. But a few others take it too far. She tells me what she wants me to do over Skype. I love to Skype see... So yeah I do some pretty weird stuff for her but it's worth it cause she gives me attention.
'I don't get much attention. I've always been a loner. I dig dirt for a living, making holes in the ground to make swimming pools. So I don't get out much.
Alleged examples of conversations between Hanna and a man online
'I see myself as inferior to her so the rules don't necessarily apply to her. I know it sounds crazy but if you're in the situation and get the kind of attention you've never experienced before you overlook the hypocrisy.
'I'd never question her motives for fear that she'd stop talking to me.'
Poison Ivy has even convinced him to pour vinegar down the hole of his penis.
Many of the men appear emotionally unstable, bursting into tears while begging for forgiveness.
She convinces one man to shave off his beard and eyebrows, saying it will 'look hot' but once he does it and insecurely asks if she likes it, she replies 'Do you want me to be honest? No.'
She adds: 'I just wanted to see what you look like with no eyebrows.'
She also encourages him to put his head down the toilet in another video.
Just some of the men who have posted images of themselves with 'Hanna' written on them
A man who said he was in a relationship with Hanna posted this image to social media with the caption: 'I'm so sorry Hanna. Please take me back'
Hanna, who appears to be of Asian heritage, has several tweets explicitly glamourising suicide.
'And the only way to do is properly is for a couple to suicide together, because that way they will have been together forever, as they surely promised each other.'
However, Hanna refutes claims she has encouraged men to commit suicide.
'I do not, under any circumstances, encourage others to commit suicide. My intention was only to troll men responsible for harassing me online,' Hanna told Daily Mail Australia.
'Others have encouraged me to commit suicide,' insists the woman known as Poison Ivy.
The online temptress further says her Twitter statement which appears to glamourise suicide, was intended as nothing more than an 'inside joke among her friends'.
Hanna has detailed her full response in a video posted to YouTube.
For confidential support call the Samaritans on 116123 or visit a local Samaritans branch, see www.samaritans.org for details.
For confidential help, call Lifeline at 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue on 1300 224 636
Source
Feminism has led to.the destruction of men. By removing the father from the home and eliminating positive male role models and influences from our culture. It has led to led to a misandric environment where females can exploit and destroy men at will. Western society has given women special rights that men do not enjoy and as a result, women and a misandric society do not value men. They see men as disposable or worst yet,to be purposely destroyed for the continuation of their misandric society.I'm not going to post the photos of the guys that went through this hell. If you want to see them click on the link. What we are seeing is evil women who use and exploit vulnerable men through emotional manipulation by playing on their desire for a girlfriend and their desire to be loved and accepted. A natural human need exploited for evil purposes. It is because of these evil purposes that society exploits and magnifies that need through the media that men are nothing without a girlfriend or wife. That they are incomplete without one. This is the same media that tells women they don't need a man and encourage them to be evil and destroy men. This has to stop. Society has to take this shit seriously. There is however a redeeming factor and that is this: Hanna wrote that she is hoping to meet the male version of her. On that, we are on the same page because I hope she does meet the male version of her and I hope he does to her what she has done to these men.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Thursday, September 12, 2019
Wednesday, September 4, 2019
Trump levels the playing field
Let's thank President Trump for taking this heroic stance in reinstating men's rights at the executive level. The more of us he hears from the better.
Saturday, August 10, 2019
Terrence Popp's message to Donald Trump
Let's make sure President Trump gets the message. Tell him your opinion on how this needs to be addressed right away. In fact also contact your Congressional Representative and Senators and let them know as well. The more of us they hear from the better.
Sunday, August 4, 2019
New law protects prostitutes and gives them special rights
What about the men? Are the rights of johns observed or are they still subject to arrest and asset forfeiture? I'm betting on the latter. Look for drug addicts or otherwise sick and/or fucked up bitches to set men up or falsely accuse men of a crime. MGTOW is one thing but fighting back is even better. Resistance is successful as long as you have room to get away. When you no longer have that room and are pushed into a corner then it's time to fight back. That is why it is essential to be an MRA/MGTOW.
Saturday, August 3, 2019
Male student at USC takes on title ix
To help Kursat Christoff Pekgoz click here.
This young man is engaging in activism. He is going about it in the right way. Let's support him.
Sunday, July 28, 2019
British woman who alleged gang rape in Cyprus arrested on suspicion of making a false allegation
A British woman who claimed she was gang-raped in Cyprus has been arrested on suspicion of making a false accusation as police released seven Israeli tourists from custody.
The 19-year-old woman had claimed that 12 Israeli teenagers raped her on July 17 at a hotel in the popular holiday resort of Ayia Napa.
The teenagers were remanded in custody the following day. Five were sent home hours before their second scheduled court hearing last Thursday after no evidence was found against them.
The other seven were released on Sunday after the woman reportedly changed her story after being shown video evidence by investigators.
The woman told investigators she initially filed a rape report after feeling "angry and insulted" that some of the Israelis had filmed her having sex with them, according to the state-run Cyprus News Agency.
“I went down from the room and met two of my friends. I told them what had happened and they immediately told me to file a complaint with police,” Israeli media outlet Channel 12 quoted her as saying.
The suspects told the outlet that the woman agreed to be filmed and "everything was consensual."
"She wanted sex," one of them said.
During a custody hearing last week, investigators told a court in the town of Paralimni that the woman was in a relationship with one of the seven suspects and had sexual contact with some of the other six over several days, according to Yiannis Habaris, a Cypriot lawyer representing two of the suspects.
"As I have argued throughout the process, there was no rape in Cyprus," said Nir Yaslovitzh, an Israeli lawyer representing some of the remaining suspects. "The young men who went on a vacation that became a nightmare will go home today."
On their release the young men were greeted outside the police district headquarters in Paralimni by jubilant family members.
The 12 Israelis had come to Ayia Napa in three separate groups, some on holiday before being inducted into the army, and did not know each other, said Mr Yaslovitzh.
On his release from custody, the Israeli teen considered the prime suspect said, "the truth has been revealed."
“God will punish her. We don’t care whether she is prosecuted, the main thing is that she has been arrested,” he told the Times of Israel. “All the teenagers coming to Ayia Napa need to be careful.”
The UK provides Cyprus with its biggest tourist market, with over 1.3 million British tourists visiting the eastern Mediterranean island last year, according to official Cypriot statistics.
Cyprus is also a major destination for Israeli tourists, with more than 230,000 visiting in 2019.
Ayia Napa Mayor Yiannis Karousos told Israel’s Channel 13 news that legal action would be taken against anyone involved in the false allegation, including the woman herself.
“In the following days, the council of ministers will approve the installation of CCTV cameras around the city of Ayia Napa, the first of their type in Cyprus,” he added. “Because tourists don’t just have to be safe, they have to feel they are safe."
Source
I'm glad there are still countries that have men in charge. Unlike America and the rest of the anglosphere that is too pussy ass scared to prosecute female false accusers Cyprus actually has the guts to hold women accountable. I'm glad to see there are places where real men rule. With the exception of President Trump, girlie men run America and that has to change.
The 19-year-old woman had claimed that 12 Israeli teenagers raped her on July 17 at a hotel in the popular holiday resort of Ayia Napa.
The teenagers were remanded in custody the following day. Five were sent home hours before their second scheduled court hearing last Thursday after no evidence was found against them.
The other seven were released on Sunday after the woman reportedly changed her story after being shown video evidence by investigators.
The woman told investigators she initially filed a rape report after feeling "angry and insulted" that some of the Israelis had filmed her having sex with them, according to the state-run Cyprus News Agency.
“I went down from the room and met two of my friends. I told them what had happened and they immediately told me to file a complaint with police,” Israeli media outlet Channel 12 quoted her as saying.
The suspects told the outlet that the woman agreed to be filmed and "everything was consensual."
"She wanted sex," one of them said.
During a custody hearing last week, investigators told a court in the town of Paralimni that the woman was in a relationship with one of the seven suspects and had sexual contact with some of the other six over several days, according to Yiannis Habaris, a Cypriot lawyer representing two of the suspects.
"As I have argued throughout the process, there was no rape in Cyprus," said Nir Yaslovitzh, an Israeli lawyer representing some of the remaining suspects. "The young men who went on a vacation that became a nightmare will go home today."
On their release the young men were greeted outside the police district headquarters in Paralimni by jubilant family members.
The 12 Israelis had come to Ayia Napa in three separate groups, some on holiday before being inducted into the army, and did not know each other, said Mr Yaslovitzh.
On his release from custody, the Israeli teen considered the prime suspect said, "the truth has been revealed."
“God will punish her. We don’t care whether she is prosecuted, the main thing is that she has been arrested,” he told the Times of Israel. “All the teenagers coming to Ayia Napa need to be careful.”
The UK provides Cyprus with its biggest tourist market, with over 1.3 million British tourists visiting the eastern Mediterranean island last year, according to official Cypriot statistics.
Cyprus is also a major destination for Israeli tourists, with more than 230,000 visiting in 2019.
Ayia Napa Mayor Yiannis Karousos told Israel’s Channel 13 news that legal action would be taken against anyone involved in the false allegation, including the woman herself.
“In the following days, the council of ministers will approve the installation of CCTV cameras around the city of Ayia Napa, the first of their type in Cyprus,” he added. “Because tourists don’t just have to be safe, they have to feel they are safe."
Source
I'm glad there are still countries that have men in charge. Unlike America and the rest of the anglosphere that is too pussy ass scared to prosecute female false accusers Cyprus actually has the guts to hold women accountable. I'm glad to see there are places where real men rule. With the exception of President Trump, girlie men run America and that has to change.
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Dave Futrelle lies about MGTOW
I was at Dave Futrelle's website where he was ragging on the great MGTOW movement that is waking men up to the realities of feminism. Futrelle's lies are well known throughout the manosphere and we find his ineptness quite comical. Then again Dave has always been an unintentional comedian. Anyway, I left the following comment on his website. Let's see if he has the manhood to publish it:
As usual, Dave has no idea what he is talking about. MGTOW, along with the Men's Rights Movement, are very justified in their positions. It is feminism that is illegitimate and dangerous. It is brave men who stood up to these feminist monsters and for that these men are heroes.
Very sincerely,
Masculist Man-Masculist/Men's Rights Activist and Man Going His Own Way
BTW, the pet store is having a sale on cats but only if you buy in bulk which I'm sure you will. So while you are renewing your restraining orders against Dave you can go buy 50 cats at a time.
As usual, Dave has no idea what he is talking about. MGTOW, along with the Men's Rights Movement, are very justified in their positions. It is feminism that is illegitimate and dangerous. It is brave men who stood up to these feminist monsters and for that these men are heroes.
Very sincerely,
Masculist Man-Masculist/Men's Rights Activist and Man Going His Own Way
BTW, the pet store is having a sale on cats but only if you buy in bulk which I'm sure you will. So while you are renewing your restraining orders against Dave you can go buy 50 cats at a time.
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
Sunday, June 30, 2019
Polls Show that a Majority of Women Now Support Socialism
New poll reports show that a majority of women between the ages of 18 and 54 prefer to live in a socialist country over a capitalist country.
Specifically, 55 percent of women between the ages of 18 and 54 approve of certain socialist policies. This new trend of socialism’s rising approval was highlighted in a Harris poll for “Axios on HBO.”
On the other hand, a majority of men disagreed with embracing socialism and preferred to live in a capitalist society instead.
The Harris poll revealed that “the public has varying levels of agreement on what exactly constitutes a socialist political system.”
Trending: NEW SCANDAL: NSA Caught Red-handed Spying on Americans Again
The poll detailed the following responses to what people considered as socialism:
Universal healthcare: 76%
Tuition-free education: 72%
Living wage: 68%
State-controlled economy: 66%
State control and regulation of private property: 61%
High taxes for the rich: 60%
State-controlled media and communication: 57%
Strong environmental regulations: 56%
High public spending: 55%
Government “democratizes” private businesses — that is, gives workers control over them — to the greatest extent possible: 52%
System dependent on dictatorship: 49%
Workers own and control their places of employment: 48%
Democratically-elected government: 46%
Axios’s Alexi McCammond observed on “Axios on HBO”:
We’ve seen this pattern of behavior where women are turning out in higher numbers as voters and as candidates than we’ve ever seen. They’re getting elected in higher numbers than before. They’re pushing the conversation in different ways.
The political reporter continued, “They’re looking for someone, a candidate on either side, who’ll support this idea of a socialist country that they want to live in.”
Within the Democratic party, socialism has become more popular since 2016. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders gave a speech on June 19, 2019 defending his preferred brand of socialism, “democratic socialism.”
For the younger generations, Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez has become a leading figure in the fight to normalize radically leftist ideas.
This trend will likely continue as business, cultural institutions, and educational venues embrace leftist political culture.
Source
Women do look up to Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez as a leader so this is most likely a very accurate poll. That is why if you want to preserve capitalism then it is best to vote pro-male. Pro-Male=Pro-Capitalism=Pro-Democracy.
Specifically, 55 percent of women between the ages of 18 and 54 approve of certain socialist policies. This new trend of socialism’s rising approval was highlighted in a Harris poll for “Axios on HBO.”
On the other hand, a majority of men disagreed with embracing socialism and preferred to live in a capitalist society instead.
The Harris poll revealed that “the public has varying levels of agreement on what exactly constitutes a socialist political system.”
Trending: NEW SCANDAL: NSA Caught Red-handed Spying on Americans Again
The poll detailed the following responses to what people considered as socialism:
Universal healthcare: 76%
Tuition-free education: 72%
Living wage: 68%
State-controlled economy: 66%
State control and regulation of private property: 61%
High taxes for the rich: 60%
State-controlled media and communication: 57%
Strong environmental regulations: 56%
High public spending: 55%
Government “democratizes” private businesses — that is, gives workers control over them — to the greatest extent possible: 52%
System dependent on dictatorship: 49%
Workers own and control their places of employment: 48%
Democratically-elected government: 46%
Axios’s Alexi McCammond observed on “Axios on HBO”:
We’ve seen this pattern of behavior where women are turning out in higher numbers as voters and as candidates than we’ve ever seen. They’re getting elected in higher numbers than before. They’re pushing the conversation in different ways.
The political reporter continued, “They’re looking for someone, a candidate on either side, who’ll support this idea of a socialist country that they want to live in.”
Within the Democratic party, socialism has become more popular since 2016. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders gave a speech on June 19, 2019 defending his preferred brand of socialism, “democratic socialism.”
For the younger generations, Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez has become a leading figure in the fight to normalize radically leftist ideas.
This trend will likely continue as business, cultural institutions, and educational venues embrace leftist political culture.
Source
Women do look up to Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez as a leader so this is most likely a very accurate poll. That is why if you want to preserve capitalism then it is best to vote pro-male. Pro-Male=Pro-Capitalism=Pro-Democracy.
Thursday, June 27, 2019
A little something from Onyx and Biohazard
Here's a hardcore song by some hardcore motherfuckers. In your face proud to be men hardcore metal.
Lyrics:
Slam! (duh duh duh, duh duh duh - Let the boys be boys!) [x2]
[Verse 1:]
Well, it's another (What!?) In the gutter (What!?) Ghetto runnin' 'em
Troublesome - Extra double dum; I come to beat 'em
Defeat 'em and mistreat 'em - so what if that I'm cheatin'?
Now everyone wanna say I'm grimy (Yeah, I know!)
I'm-a show ya' how; Come on! (All in together now!)
Yeah, ooh, yeah - YEAH! - That's how it's gotta be, so
Stop tryin' to be loud as me, 'cause you can't do that!
Think about it! Playin' Russian roulette with an automatic,
I put my ass against the line, the last bullet is first - on line
Toughest step, and I rep and I run; Packin' a weapon is wild!
Peace to the brothers on Ryker's Isle - Toughen up; A-tremble-em-ba-lin
Like a crimin-a-million puffs I took: I - ooh, my God, I'm so high!
Just they say, "Hey, Rodney, " say, "You look like a -
- Grem-a-lin!" A What!? Just they say to make a kid
Make a million children slam! Slam! SLAM!
Slam! (duh duh duh, duh duh duh - Let the boys be boys!) [x4]
[Verse 2:]
I'm the mean 'n nasty, greedy-smashing, ever-slow-gasser (Ooh!)
Strictly swift blast of the raspy-rasp basher (Aah!)
That I provide - I provide that you was cheap!
Beside the ghetto vibe make me flip like Jeckle and Hyde (Of Course!)
I come across with the pure, for sure
Un-adult-a-rated, un-conformed
Disgusted! Busted! You wanna touch it! Too hot!
You forgot, you're not ready! Your head could get ruptured!
Hit between the eyes; I plan to vandalize
I supply the static (I roll with the bad guys!)
The villians (Yup), Crooks (HA), biters and the fighters!
See the big wreck? Could ya' if ya' look inside of
My mind: It's graphic. Expressed it. Grasp it.
So, kill the copy cat - I can't: It's all mastered!
Directed it. When ya' least expected it
And thought it was safe, ONYX hit you in the face, so SLAM!
Slam! (duh duh duh, duh duh duh - Let the boys be boys!) [x4]
[Verse 3: Sticky Fingaz]
I'm a b-boy
Standin in my b-boy stance
Hurry up and give me the microphone before I bust in my pants
The mad author of anguish; my language, polluted
Onyx is heavyweight ([Sonsee:] And still undisputed!)
He took the words right out my mouth and walked a mile in my shoes
I've paid so many dues, I feel used and abused
And I'm... so confused
Umm, excuse me, for example
I'm the inspiration, for a WHOLE generation
And unless you got 10 Sticky Fingers
It's straight immitation
A figment, of your imagination
But but but but wait it gets worse!
I'm not watered down so I'm dyin of thirst
Comin thru with a scam, a foolproof plan
B-boys make some noise, and just, JUST SLAM!
Slam! (duh duh duh, duh duh duh - Let the boys be boys!) [x8]
SLAM!
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
AOC Blames Man for “Sexist” Article…Written by Women
U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez issued a confusing tweet last week accusing a male CNN journalist of sexist reporting on a story that was actually penned by a pair of women.
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, popularly known as “AOC” by her followers and critics alike, replied to a tweet by CNN reporter Andrew Kaczyknski. The tweet linked to an article about U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren which revealed that the Democratic presidential candidate staged a lucrative side career as an attorney during her pre-Senate career as a Harvard law professor.
AOC took this as an offense. In a bizarre reply, the progressive lawmaker suggested that this was not only worth reporting on all, but to do so was akin to sexism. She also included jabs at Wall Street and Big Pharma, in line with her progressive persona.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
✔
@AOC
BREAKING NEWS: Lady Had A Job, Got Paid More Than Me
Nice work. Now do the amount of Wall Street, Big Pharma, & Fossil Fuel 💰 presidential candidates accepted over their careers & how much they’re taking now.
andrew kaczynski
✔
@KFILE
While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/while-teaching-elizabeth-warren-worked-on-more-than-50-legal-matters-charging-as-much-as-675-an-hour/2019/05/22/9ce56840-7ce0-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html …
110K
5:42 AM - May 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
20.5K people are talking about this
The tweet here suggests that Kaczynski is simply upset that Warren, a woman, made more money than him. The senator was reportedly making around $675 per hour with her legal work during her tenured career at Harvard.
Apparently, the New York native overlooked a couple of things. First, the article in question was penned not by Kaczynski, but rather by two female researchers writing for the Washington Post. Elise Viebeck and Annie Linskey found that Warren dealt with at least 50 legal matters at the time.
The original story in question undercuts Warren’s image as some sort of working-class champion. Like AOC, Warren is typically perceived to be among the Democratic Party’s hard-left wing. This doesn’t stack up well considering Warren’s career as both an elite Ivy League professor as well as a very prolific attorney.
Obviously, there really isn’t anything sexist happening here — either by the Washington Post’s writers or by the CNN reporter. But, it portrays a far-left female politician in a negative light, and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez can’t have that. Shooting past the clear conclusion that Warren’s credentials as a pure progressive may be less than genuine, AOC is claiming that a sexist male is just trying to downplay a strong woman’s accomplishments.
This isn’t the first time Ocasio-Cortez enthusiastically pulled the “sexism” card where no sexist behavior took place. Earlier in her political career — which followed a bartending gig — the then-candidate for Congress accused conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro of “catcalling” her by challenging her to an on-air debate. Of course, the prospective representative would have had every right to simply say “no”, but she had to take it a step further.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
✔
@AOC
Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions.
And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one.
188K
6:32 PM - Aug 9, 2018
57.7K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez remains a favorite among American progressive circles. Her proposed “Green New Deal”, which included far-reaching goals to rebuild every single building in the United States as well as ban air travel, has been embraced by Democratic Party ideologues and presidential candidates, including Elizabeth Warren.
Source
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, popularly known as “AOC” by her followers and critics alike, replied to a tweet by CNN reporter Andrew Kaczyknski. The tweet linked to an article about U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren which revealed that the Democratic presidential candidate staged a lucrative side career as an attorney during her pre-Senate career as a Harvard law professor.
AOC took this as an offense. In a bizarre reply, the progressive lawmaker suggested that this was not only worth reporting on all, but to do so was akin to sexism. She also included jabs at Wall Street and Big Pharma, in line with her progressive persona.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
✔
@AOC
BREAKING NEWS: Lady Had A Job, Got Paid More Than Me
Nice work. Now do the amount of Wall Street, Big Pharma, & Fossil Fuel 💰 presidential candidates accepted over their careers & how much they’re taking now.
andrew kaczynski
✔
@KFILE
While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/while-teaching-elizabeth-warren-worked-on-more-than-50-legal-matters-charging-as-much-as-675-an-hour/2019/05/22/9ce56840-7ce0-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html …
110K
5:42 AM - May 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
20.5K people are talking about this
The tweet here suggests that Kaczynski is simply upset that Warren, a woman, made more money than him. The senator was reportedly making around $675 per hour with her legal work during her tenured career at Harvard.
Apparently, the New York native overlooked a couple of things. First, the article in question was penned not by Kaczynski, but rather by two female researchers writing for the Washington Post. Elise Viebeck and Annie Linskey found that Warren dealt with at least 50 legal matters at the time.
The original story in question undercuts Warren’s image as some sort of working-class champion. Like AOC, Warren is typically perceived to be among the Democratic Party’s hard-left wing. This doesn’t stack up well considering Warren’s career as both an elite Ivy League professor as well as a very prolific attorney.
Obviously, there really isn’t anything sexist happening here — either by the Washington Post’s writers or by the CNN reporter. But, it portrays a far-left female politician in a negative light, and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez can’t have that. Shooting past the clear conclusion that Warren’s credentials as a pure progressive may be less than genuine, AOC is claiming that a sexist male is just trying to downplay a strong woman’s accomplishments.
This isn’t the first time Ocasio-Cortez enthusiastically pulled the “sexism” card where no sexist behavior took place. Earlier in her political career — which followed a bartending gig — the then-candidate for Congress accused conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro of “catcalling” her by challenging her to an on-air debate. Of course, the prospective representative would have had every right to simply say “no”, but she had to take it a step further.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
✔
@AOC
Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions.
And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one.
188K
6:32 PM - Aug 9, 2018
57.7K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez remains a favorite among American progressive circles. Her proposed “Green New Deal”, which included far-reaching goals to rebuild every single building in the United States as well as ban air travel, has been embraced by Democratic Party ideologues and presidential candidates, including Elizabeth Warren.
Source
Sunday, April 28, 2019
Black men are the problem
Today's black man is the world's biggest simp. Today yes but not always. Back in the late '80's he had it more together than his Caucasian counterparts. Especially with Mike Tyson and his break up with wife Robin Givens. The black men stated that Givens and other women were trying to take Tyson's money,correctly labeling them as "hoes" while their white counterparts were saying "He can't do that to the little lady. That's not right". Now fast forward to today. Things have shifted. Today black men are more likely to "high miss lady" while their white counterparts go MGTOW. The black word "ho" has been replaced by the white word "skank" and skank is used a lot. Don't deny it I see it everyday and it's pitiful when they either get shot down or ignored altogether. I even seen it in politics. Today a young black woman,Candace Owens,is leading a pro-Trump black revolt against the Democratic Party. She is telling other black people especially black men to go against the Democrat slave plantation mentality. What she is saying is not new. In fact a conservative black man,Jesse Lee Peterson,has been telling black people especially black men the same thing for decades. Peterson even operates a program to help men in these perilous times. All Owens does is talk. Yet Owens is heeded and Peterson ignored. Owens has yet to reach her 30th birthday while Peterson has been around prior to the civil rights movement. Peterson has more life experience than Owens has but because Owens is a young woman while Peterson is an older gentleman she is heard while he is ignored. This is going to continue until men stop letting women lead them around. In the United States and the rest of the anglosphere that means it will never end.
Thursday, April 18, 2019
A victim of Cardi B steps forward
Cardi B's drugging scandal just got worse. A man has come forward to claim that he was once drugged by Cardi B, and robbed. And a new hashtag has been created to highlight Cardi victimizing men- #SurvivingCardiB.
A man has come forward claiming that he was drugged by Cardi, then he was beaten and robbed by Cardi and her gang.
Before the alleged first victim came forward this morning, Cardi B was working overtime to thwart the pending 'drugging' scandal.
Yesterday Cardi was forced to speak out and defend herself against detractors who watched the Instagram video showing Bardi recalling that she drugged and robbed men when she worked as a stripper.
The scandal popped off this weekend, when a three-year-old video that was shared on social media over the weekend, Cardi, whose real name is Belcalis Almanzar, explained that she drugged men and then robbed them. Cardi claimed that she was "forced" to rob the men in order to make it in the music industry and secure studio time.
The rapper originally posted the video in response to someone who said she did not deserve her success. She said she would drug and rob men who wanted to have sex with her during her time as a stripper in New York.
The Grammy-winning rapper initially brushed off the social media backlash in separate tweets on Sunday and Monday.
But she addressed the controversy in a lengthy post on Tuesday and said that she has not glorified her past behavior or referred to it in her music because she is not proud of it.
"I made the choices I did at the time because I had very limited options," she said. "I was blessed to have been able to rise from that but so many women have not."
Source
A man has come forward claiming that he was drugged by Cardi, then he was beaten and robbed by Cardi and her gang.
Before the alleged first victim came forward this morning, Cardi B was working overtime to thwart the pending 'drugging' scandal.
Yesterday Cardi was forced to speak out and defend herself against detractors who watched the Instagram video showing Bardi recalling that she drugged and robbed men when she worked as a stripper.
The scandal popped off this weekend, when a three-year-old video that was shared on social media over the weekend, Cardi, whose real name is Belcalis Almanzar, explained that she drugged men and then robbed them. Cardi claimed that she was "forced" to rob the men in order to make it in the music industry and secure studio time.
The rapper originally posted the video in response to someone who said she did not deserve her success. She said she would drug and rob men who wanted to have sex with her during her time as a stripper in New York.
The Grammy-winning rapper initially brushed off the social media backlash in separate tweets on Sunday and Monday.
But she addressed the controversy in a lengthy post on Tuesday and said that she has not glorified her past behavior or referred to it in her music because she is not proud of it.
"I made the choices I did at the time because I had very limited options," she said. "I was blessed to have been able to rise from that but so many women have not."
Source
This is so fucked up
Judge tells banned drink-driver who caused massive crash: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'
Victoria Parry smashed into three cars and had to be pulled from her burning Fiat
A judge told a banned drink-driver who smashed into three other vehicles that she would have been jailed if she were a man.
Judge Sarah Buckingham said "alcoholic" Victoria Parry would have been "straight down the stairs" to prison had her sex been different.
The 30-year-old, who already had two previous convictions for drink-driving was dragged from her Fiat Stilo after the car caught fire following the pile-up on the A46 last May.
Victoria Parry was told she would have been jailed if she were a man.
Victoria Parry was told she would have been jailed if she were a man.
READ MORE:
Judge faces probe after telling drink-driver: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'
Tests showed she was almost three times over the drink-drive limit, while Warwick Crown Court heard she had been drinking up to two bottles of wine a day.
Parry - left with a "considerable drink problem" after a 15-year abusive relationship - had also been banned from driving for three years in July 2015 for her second excess alcohol offence.
But - after calling the case "shocking" - the judge delayed sentencing Parry for three months after she admitted a charge of dangerous driving.
READ MORE:
Judge furiously blasted after telling drink-driver: 'I'd have jailed you if you were a man'
And the judge said: “If Miss Parry was a man, there is no question it would have been straight down the stairs, because this is a shocking case of dangerous driving against a background of two previous convictions for excess alcohol.
“But this offence was committed in May 2018 and she has not been in trouble since. She has clearly got an alcohol problem. She is, whether she admits it or not, an alcoholic.”
The crash happened at around 6.50pm on May 23 after Parry overtook in the middle of the road in the face of oncoming traffic on the A46 Stratford by-pass.
She smashed into a van, a Vauxhall Insignia and wrote off a BMW.
Her Fiat then plunged down an embankment and burst into flames in woodland.
Thomas Cook flight outfit row passenger sparks fierce This Morning row after being branded 'pathetic'
Parry, of Grange Road, Bearley, Stratford-upon-Avon, told an off-duty police officer who rushed to help that she had drunk a bottle of wine and "shouldn't be driving", the court heard.
Tim Sapwell, prosecuting, said Parry was arrested, and when she took a breath test at the police station almost two hours later, the reading was only just under three times the legal limit.
Lucy Tapper, defending, said: “There is deep and genuine regret on her part.
“Having a crash presents its own consequences in terms of what you’ve done, and to have your car burst into flames is quite terrifying. She says she thought she was going to die.
“This has been a very salutary lesson to her. I would ask that she be spared immediate custody, if at all possible.”
Miss Tapper said Parry had been in an abusive relationship for 15 years, and for the last five years had found herself with a considerable drink problem.
“She was unable to tackle that after the first offence and after the second offence, but since this matter she has all but stopped drinking.”
Judge Buckingham remarked: “All but! So she hasn’t stopped.”
Miss Tapper said Parry had ‘got it under control,’ and was no longer drinking two bottles of wine a day, and was out of the relationship and in a job where she had stepped down from a management role but was now working her way back up.
The judge commented: “If Miss Parry was a man, there is no question it would have been straight down the stairs, because this is a shocking case of dangerous driving against a background of two previous convictions for excess alcohol.
“But this offence was committed in May 2018 and she has not been in trouble since. She has clearly got an alcohol problem. She is, whether she admits it or not, an alcoholic.”
Deferring sentence, Judge Buckingham told Parry: “You richly deserve an immediate custodial sentence of 18 months. I want to see whether you can really address the issues rather than paying lip service.”
Schoolboy hospitalised after violent hammer attack in Lightwoods Park, Bearwood
Parry was ordered to abstain from alcohol, attend meetings of a body such as Alcoholics Anonymous, and to pay for private counselling to tackle her alcohol problem.
The judge told her: “If you succeed, I will not make the custody immediate. If you don’t comply, I will conclude that you are not worthy of the chance.”
Source
Saturday, April 6, 2019
Matriarchy goes after fair minded judge
New Jersey Superior Court Judge John F. Russo Jr. is facing a possible three-month suspension without pay for asking an alleged sexual assault victim whether she tried closing her legs to prevent the assault.
The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct overseeing the case say he has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct with this line of questioning in addition to numerous other instances in recent years, the Washington Post reports.
In 2016, Russo was overseeing a case where a woman was seeking a restraining order against the father of her child, who she claims raped her and threatened her life. In the transcript from the hearing, Russo began a line of questioning by asking, “Do you know how to stop somebody from having intercourse with you?” According to the transcript, the judge had the woman list out ways to prevent an assault. She suggested attempting to physically harm her assailant, saying no, and running away. When asked if there was anything else she could have done, the woman responded, “That’s all I know.” To which, Russo asked, “Block your body parts? Close your legs? Call the police? Did you do any of those things?”
The committee found Russo’s line of questioning to be “unwarranted” and “egregious given the potential for those questions to re-victimize the plaintiff, who sought redress from the court under palpably difficult circumstances.” According to the committee’s report, Russo denied the woman’s request for a restraining order, citing her answers to his line of questioning as reason for his decision.
Russo stands by his line of questioning, saying that it was necessary to “demonstrate the element of force or coercion used during the assault.” He denies that the questions were inappropriate; however, the committee claims that Russo has agreed to not ask those types of questions in the future. In March 2018, Russo’s lawyer, David F. Corrigan, made a statement to the local NBC News station, saying, “Judge Russo looks forward to a public hearing in which he will be able to respond to the allegations against him.” This was right after the complaint was filed.
The committee's investigation into the matter includes interviews with Russo and two dozen other individuals. The recommendation for his suspension, a 45-page document, was released earlier this week. According to the New York Times, the New Jersey Supreme Court has set a hearing for July to determine what disciplinary actions will be taken.
Source
The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct overseeing the case say he has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct with this line of questioning in addition to numerous other instances in recent years, the Washington Post reports.
In 2016, Russo was overseeing a case where a woman was seeking a restraining order against the father of her child, who she claims raped her and threatened her life. In the transcript from the hearing, Russo began a line of questioning by asking, “Do you know how to stop somebody from having intercourse with you?” According to the transcript, the judge had the woman list out ways to prevent an assault. She suggested attempting to physically harm her assailant, saying no, and running away. When asked if there was anything else she could have done, the woman responded, “That’s all I know.” To which, Russo asked, “Block your body parts? Close your legs? Call the police? Did you do any of those things?”
The committee found Russo’s line of questioning to be “unwarranted” and “egregious given the potential for those questions to re-victimize the plaintiff, who sought redress from the court under palpably difficult circumstances.” According to the committee’s report, Russo denied the woman’s request for a restraining order, citing her answers to his line of questioning as reason for his decision.
Russo stands by his line of questioning, saying that it was necessary to “demonstrate the element of force or coercion used during the assault.” He denies that the questions were inappropriate; however, the committee claims that Russo has agreed to not ask those types of questions in the future. In March 2018, Russo’s lawyer, David F. Corrigan, made a statement to the local NBC News station, saying, “Judge Russo looks forward to a public hearing in which he will be able to respond to the allegations against him.” This was right after the complaint was filed.
The committee's investigation into the matter includes interviews with Russo and two dozen other individuals. The recommendation for his suspension, a 45-page document, was released earlier this week. According to the New York Times, the New Jersey Supreme Court has set a hearing for July to determine what disciplinary actions will be taken.
Source
Monday, April 1, 2019
Tell Sen. Patty Murray: 'Due process IS America'
From SAVE Services:
Tomorrow morning, the Senate HELP Committee will hold a hearing on "Addressing Campus Sexual Assault and Ensuring Student Safety and Rights."
In the past, Sen. Patty Murray, who is the highest ranking Democrat on the Committee, has often pushed the "one in five" fake statistic in order to justify the existence of the campus Kangaroo Courts.
Somehow, Murray has forgotten that all Americans, including college students, are guaranteed due process by the Constitution.
So please telephone Murray's office at (202) 224-2621. Tell her, "Due process IS America!"
Better yet, tell her to watch the attached video, "Due Process Goes to School:"
Sincerely,
The SAVE Team
Or if you prefer to email her you can do that. The more of us she hears from the better.
Saturday, March 30, 2019
No more passes for Joe Biden
Democrat Lucy Flores was preparing to give one of her final stump speeches in a race for lieutenant governor in Nevada when she felt two hands on her shoulders. She froze. “Why is the vice-president of the United States touching me?” Flores wondered.
Flores recounts her experience with Joe Biden in a first-person essay for New York Magazine, describing an incident in 2014 where Biden came up behind her, leaned in, smelled her hair, and kissed the back of her head.
“Biden was the second-most powerful man in the country and, arguably, one of the most powerful men in the world. He was there to promote me as the right person for the lieutenant governor job. Instead, he made me feel uneasy, gross, and confused.”
New York Magazine reached out to a Biden spokesperson, who declined to comment. After the story ran, a Biden spokesman Bill Russo said the vice president and his staff do not recall the incident Flores described.
Flores’s experience isn’t unique. It is no secret in Washington that Biden has touched numerous women inappropriately in public. It’s just never been treated as a serious issue by the mainstream press.
Biden’s been caught on camera embracing a female reporter from behind and gripping her above her waist, just below her bust. At a swearing-in ceremony for Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Biden put his hands on the shoulders of Stephanie Carter, Carter’s wife, and then leaned in and whispered into her ear. (He’s whispered into many women’s ears.) He’s also touched women’s faces and necks during other photo ops. Once at a swearing-in ceremony for a US senator, he held the upper arm of the senator’s preteen daughter, leaned down and whispered into her ear, as she became visibly uncomfortable. Then he kissed the side of her forehead, a gesture that made the girl flinch.
It’s all out in the open. News outlets wrote about these incidents. But the stories ran under light-hearted headlines like, “Photo of famously friendly Joe Biden goes viral” or “Here’s Joe Biden being Joe Biden with Ash Carter’s wife” or “Joe Biden: Sex symbol?,” a piece that I edited and now regret.
Ideological media outlets did write some critical pieces during the Obama era. At the Federalist, Mollie Hemingway questioned whether liberals would tolerate the same conduct from a conservative. At Talking Points Memo, Alana Levinson criticized liberals for giving him a pass.
But, overall, Biden got a pass from the political media.
Times have changed. Reporters now would look twice at a new politician who is handsy on camera. They’d ask questions about it and likely look into his private conduct. And women like Flores are taking big risks and speaking out.
Biden avoided scrutiny in the past, but if he wants to be the next president he’ll face pressure to account for his actions.
Joe being Joe
The Onion satirized Biden in 2009 in a viral article that cemented Biden’s image of a lovable everyman.
Real Biden remembers his working-class Scranton roots. Onion Biden washes his Trans Am on the White House lawn. Real Biden is handsy with women. Onion Biden is a womanizer: ‘Hey, hot stuff, looking good,’ [Onion] Biden told a passing aide. ‘Would you know where I could get a little bucket and sponge action? My mean machine needs to be cleaned.’
The images bled together over the years into the persona of Uncle Joe. When he dropped an F-bomb on a live mic, it was a classic Joe moment. When he made one of his many gaffes, it got added to numerous lists written in good fun. And when he did kind of creepy things to women at public events, well, that was just Joe being Joe, too.
All of those frames made appealing pitches just a few years ago. Editors would be happy to get a “lovable Uncle Joe strikes again” story. The environment is not the same now. Certainly the media is not nearly perfect when it comes to covering gender and power. But in the era of #MeToo, there is far less appetite for a story that makes light of a candidate behaving badly toward women.
As Flores writes, this conduct matters. “I’m not suggesting that Biden broke any laws, but the transgressions that society deems minor (or doesn’t even see as transgressions) often feel considerable to the person on the receiving end. That imbalance of power and attention is the whole point — and the whole problem.”
This is especially true in a context where Biden will be running against several women as well as defending a decades-long record of policymaking that’s involved past positions at odds with current Democratic Party orthodoxy.
Biden once said a woman should not have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body”
Biden, 76, arrived in Washington at the age of 30. His substantial public record includes a mixed history on women’s issues, a legacy that makes his in-person conduct even more worthy of discussion.
Lisa Lerer unpacked his history on abortion for the New York Times, reporting that Biden, who is now pro-abortion rights, has not been a solid liberal on the issue for his whole career.
In the Reagan era, Biden voted for a bill in committee that the National Abortion Rights Action League called “the most devastating attack yet on abortion rights.” Biden, who is Catholic, said at the time: “I’m probably a victim, or a product, however you want to phrase it, of my background.” He called the decision “the single most difficult vote I’ve cast as a U.S. senator.”
Biden also held the opinion that the Supreme Court went “too far” in deciding Roe v. Wade. In an interview in 1974, he said he did not think a woman should have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body.”
Biden declined to speak with Lerer for her article, so we don’t know exactly how and why he evolved on Roe. A spokesperson for Biden did not respond to an email asking for comment.
In his years in Washington, though, Biden has voted for pro-abortion rights bills. He’s championed the Violence Against Women Act. And he’s spoken forcefully about the problem of sexual violence.
Democrats need to figure out whether they want to clean house
If Biden runs, he’ll occupy a lane in the Democratic primary as the “normal” candidate — a likable white guy who won’t lose it on Twitter, or pander to Russia, or throw children in cages at the border.
As Democrats grapple with the intense desire to beat Trump in 2020, many are anxious that a woman will have a tough time beating him because of sexist attitudes still held by some voters. Perhaps, the thinking goes, it’s better to go with the kind of leader that Americans are used to. Biden, who was in office for eight years under Obama, could fit that bill.
But Biden would still have to present a clear contrast to Trump. While Biden has not been accused of sexual assault (as Trump has a dozen times) and there are no tapes of Biden on the Internet joking about grabbing women by the genitals, there are tapes of Biden behaving inappropriately. One man’s behavior is far worse, but that doesn’t excuse the other.
Democrats are conflicted about what to do about this category of behavior. It’s not the same as what other men of the #MeToo movement have bee accused of, but it’s also not what liberals want to endorse. Sen. Al Franken’s resignation is still controversial for this reason. Some Democrats feel the party is putting itself at a disadvantage against Republicans, who let the president get away with far worse than any accusation Franken faced.
Flores confronts the issue of whether some bad behavior is okay, forcing us to consider what these seemingly small incidents are really like. “The vice-president of the United States of America had just touched me in an intimate way reserved for close friends, family, or romantic partners — and I felt powerless to do anything about it.”
The Democratic Party is more than half women. More women than ever in history ran as Democrats in the 2018 elections — and won. They outperformed their male peers. They were central to Democrats retaking the House. Women are leading the sustained resistance to Trump. The party should be committed to making sure that women and girls participate in government and politics to their fullest potential. The party needs them.
The question is whether the party needs a president who disrespects them.
Source
This is the same media that gave Trump a bunch of bullshit about touching women inappropriately when he never did but looked the other way when Biden did the same thing. They've falsely accused numerous Republicans and/or conservatives of sexual harassment from Clarence Thomas to Brett Kavanaugh yet when Biden or Teddy Kennedy did it they were given a pass. As Reverend Jeremiah Wright has so famously stated "the chickens are coming home to roost". The Democrats have a conontrom because it is time for Joe Biden to do some reckoning. The democrat who has bullied everyday men for so long now has it thrusted in his face. Let's see how he handles it.
Flores recounts her experience with Joe Biden in a first-person essay for New York Magazine, describing an incident in 2014 where Biden came up behind her, leaned in, smelled her hair, and kissed the back of her head.
“Biden was the second-most powerful man in the country and, arguably, one of the most powerful men in the world. He was there to promote me as the right person for the lieutenant governor job. Instead, he made me feel uneasy, gross, and confused.”
New York Magazine reached out to a Biden spokesperson, who declined to comment. After the story ran, a Biden spokesman Bill Russo said the vice president and his staff do not recall the incident Flores described.
Flores’s experience isn’t unique. It is no secret in Washington that Biden has touched numerous women inappropriately in public. It’s just never been treated as a serious issue by the mainstream press.
Biden’s been caught on camera embracing a female reporter from behind and gripping her above her waist, just below her bust. At a swearing-in ceremony for Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Biden put his hands on the shoulders of Stephanie Carter, Carter’s wife, and then leaned in and whispered into her ear. (He’s whispered into many women’s ears.) He’s also touched women’s faces and necks during other photo ops. Once at a swearing-in ceremony for a US senator, he held the upper arm of the senator’s preteen daughter, leaned down and whispered into her ear, as she became visibly uncomfortable. Then he kissed the side of her forehead, a gesture that made the girl flinch.
It’s all out in the open. News outlets wrote about these incidents. But the stories ran under light-hearted headlines like, “Photo of famously friendly Joe Biden goes viral” or “Here’s Joe Biden being Joe Biden with Ash Carter’s wife” or “Joe Biden: Sex symbol?,” a piece that I edited and now regret.
Ideological media outlets did write some critical pieces during the Obama era. At the Federalist, Mollie Hemingway questioned whether liberals would tolerate the same conduct from a conservative. At Talking Points Memo, Alana Levinson criticized liberals for giving him a pass.
But, overall, Biden got a pass from the political media.
Times have changed. Reporters now would look twice at a new politician who is handsy on camera. They’d ask questions about it and likely look into his private conduct. And women like Flores are taking big risks and speaking out.
Biden avoided scrutiny in the past, but if he wants to be the next president he’ll face pressure to account for his actions.
Joe being Joe
The Onion satirized Biden in 2009 in a viral article that cemented Biden’s image of a lovable everyman.
Real Biden remembers his working-class Scranton roots. Onion Biden washes his Trans Am on the White House lawn. Real Biden is handsy with women. Onion Biden is a womanizer: ‘Hey, hot stuff, looking good,’ [Onion] Biden told a passing aide. ‘Would you know where I could get a little bucket and sponge action? My mean machine needs to be cleaned.’
The images bled together over the years into the persona of Uncle Joe. When he dropped an F-bomb on a live mic, it was a classic Joe moment. When he made one of his many gaffes, it got added to numerous lists written in good fun. And when he did kind of creepy things to women at public events, well, that was just Joe being Joe, too.
All of those frames made appealing pitches just a few years ago. Editors would be happy to get a “lovable Uncle Joe strikes again” story. The environment is not the same now. Certainly the media is not nearly perfect when it comes to covering gender and power. But in the era of #MeToo, there is far less appetite for a story that makes light of a candidate behaving badly toward women.
As Flores writes, this conduct matters. “I’m not suggesting that Biden broke any laws, but the transgressions that society deems minor (or doesn’t even see as transgressions) often feel considerable to the person on the receiving end. That imbalance of power and attention is the whole point — and the whole problem.”
This is especially true in a context where Biden will be running against several women as well as defending a decades-long record of policymaking that’s involved past positions at odds with current Democratic Party orthodoxy.
Biden once said a woman should not have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body”
Biden, 76, arrived in Washington at the age of 30. His substantial public record includes a mixed history on women’s issues, a legacy that makes his in-person conduct even more worthy of discussion.
Lisa Lerer unpacked his history on abortion for the New York Times, reporting that Biden, who is now pro-abortion rights, has not been a solid liberal on the issue for his whole career.
In the Reagan era, Biden voted for a bill in committee that the National Abortion Rights Action League called “the most devastating attack yet on abortion rights.” Biden, who is Catholic, said at the time: “I’m probably a victim, or a product, however you want to phrase it, of my background.” He called the decision “the single most difficult vote I’ve cast as a U.S. senator.”
Biden also held the opinion that the Supreme Court went “too far” in deciding Roe v. Wade. In an interview in 1974, he said he did not think a woman should have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body.”
Biden declined to speak with Lerer for her article, so we don’t know exactly how and why he evolved on Roe. A spokesperson for Biden did not respond to an email asking for comment.
In his years in Washington, though, Biden has voted for pro-abortion rights bills. He’s championed the Violence Against Women Act. And he’s spoken forcefully about the problem of sexual violence.
Democrats need to figure out whether they want to clean house
If Biden runs, he’ll occupy a lane in the Democratic primary as the “normal” candidate — a likable white guy who won’t lose it on Twitter, or pander to Russia, or throw children in cages at the border.
As Democrats grapple with the intense desire to beat Trump in 2020, many are anxious that a woman will have a tough time beating him because of sexist attitudes still held by some voters. Perhaps, the thinking goes, it’s better to go with the kind of leader that Americans are used to. Biden, who was in office for eight years under Obama, could fit that bill.
But Biden would still have to present a clear contrast to Trump. While Biden has not been accused of sexual assault (as Trump has a dozen times) and there are no tapes of Biden on the Internet joking about grabbing women by the genitals, there are tapes of Biden behaving inappropriately. One man’s behavior is far worse, but that doesn’t excuse the other.
Democrats are conflicted about what to do about this category of behavior. It’s not the same as what other men of the #MeToo movement have bee accused of, but it’s also not what liberals want to endorse. Sen. Al Franken’s resignation is still controversial for this reason. Some Democrats feel the party is putting itself at a disadvantage against Republicans, who let the president get away with far worse than any accusation Franken faced.
Flores confronts the issue of whether some bad behavior is okay, forcing us to consider what these seemingly small incidents are really like. “The vice-president of the United States of America had just touched me in an intimate way reserved for close friends, family, or romantic partners — and I felt powerless to do anything about it.”
The Democratic Party is more than half women. More women than ever in history ran as Democrats in the 2018 elections — and won. They outperformed their male peers. They were central to Democrats retaking the House. Women are leading the sustained resistance to Trump. The party should be committed to making sure that women and girls participate in government and politics to their fullest potential. The party needs them.
The question is whether the party needs a president who disrespects them.
Source
This is the same media that gave Trump a bunch of bullshit about touching women inappropriately when he never did but looked the other way when Biden did the same thing. They've falsely accused numerous Republicans and/or conservatives of sexual harassment from Clarence Thomas to Brett Kavanaugh yet when Biden or Teddy Kennedy did it they were given a pass. As Reverend Jeremiah Wright has so famously stated "the chickens are coming home to roost". The Democrats have a conontrom because it is time for Joe Biden to do some reckoning. The democrat who has bullied everyday men for so long now has it thrusted in his face. Let's see how he handles it.
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
CEO has disagreement with his wife
One point take down. Even though I can't stand his employer (the San Francisco Giants because I am a Los Angeles Dodgers fan) I can certainly understand how things get heated and a man is forced to take that route. I base this on my experience in observing these type of relationships and I can assure you the woman is not the angelic princess Lifetime makes her out to be. A lot of times these women egg a man on. Do I know what I wrote is the actual truth? No,but it is feasible and you don't become a CEO by crumbling easy. I am just doing what every other MLB observer does and that is playing the odds. Because that is what it comes down to in baseball.
Monday, March 25, 2019
Final Victory For Vladek Filler!
March 22, 2019 by Robert Franklin, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization
Call it Everyman’s “Shawshank Redemption.” Vladek Filler has won again (Bangor Daily News, 3/16/19). His victory is now complete. On March 12, federal Judge John Woodcock issued his ruling awarding Filler $1.77 million in damages for his illegal and immoral persecution by various authorities of the cities of Gouldsboro and Ellsworth, and Hancock and Washington counties. (The award is against a single person, Linda Gleason. Filler previously settled out of court with other defendants.) Perhaps more important than that award though was this statement in open court by Judge Woodcock:
And this is really, from a judicial perspective, it's just appalling. I can't say how sorry I am to you that you had such a terrible experience with the criminal justice system in this country and in this state. There's no excuse for what happened to you. I know that you were born in Kiev. Not far from Kiev is Prague. In Prague, there was an author named Franz Kafka, and he wrote a book called The Trial about a man who is subjected to a malicious and befuddling and horrific trial system, and, unfortunately, you're a living embodiment of what Franz Kafka wrote about. And I'm just terribly sorry it happened to you; there is just absolutely no excuse."
The final message of Filler’s story is that a person can, by being right, strong, calm and persistent, prevail over seemingly insuperable odds, over a system of state power that’s rigged against him.
I won’t reprise the facts of Filler’s case. I’ve written about it numerous times before. But here are a few of the people and “powers that be” over whom he prevailed:
His ex-wife who, fearing the loss of custody of their kids, leveled false allegations of sexual abuse and child abuse at him. Filler proved her allegations to be false and won sole custody of the children.
One assistant district attorney who prosecuted him for rape knowing him to be innocent of the charge. Filler proved himself to be innocent of the charge despite ADA Mary Kellett having lied to the police, lied to the judge, lied to the jury, lied to the press and violated the rules of procedure, the rules of evidence and at least seven ethical requirements for prosecutors. Filler’s persistence caused Kellett to resign her job as ADA and become the first and only prosecutor in the history of the state to be disciplined by the state bar association.
Numerous police officers who worked hand-in-glove with Kellett to try to railroad an innocent man into prison. Filler demonstrated their malfeasance in his civil suit against them. Rather than face a jury, the police settled that case out of court.
Filler prevailed in two attempts to find him guilty of criminal wrongdoing. He forced the state bar to discipline an assistant District Attorney and won significant money damages from numerous individuals and state entities. He is completely exonerated and they are disgraced. The only irony remaining is that the only person to yet apologize to Filler is Judge Woodcock, a man who’s never wronged him.
The criminal justice system is in many ways stacked against defendants. Even the innocent sometimes go to prison. But Vladek Filler proved that an innocent man can defeat the power of the state.
The family court system too is in many ways stacked against fathers, particularly when sexual assault allegations (i.e. the “silver bullet) are made against them. But Vladek Filler has proven that being in the right plus strength and perseverance can win the day.
For all those things, he stands as a beacon of hope to every innocent person who must confront and fight judicial systems that sometimes seem Kafkaesque.
Source
Vladek Filler took on the system and won. The same system that was designed to crush men like him. For that Vladek is a hero. He took on a corrupt system that hopefully is being disconnected and rendered useless. To prosecute,imprison and carry out sentences upon those at all levels of the organizations involved. We at the Men's Rights Blog salute Vladek Filler for taking on the gynocrisy and winning.
Call it Everyman’s “Shawshank Redemption.” Vladek Filler has won again (Bangor Daily News, 3/16/19). His victory is now complete. On March 12, federal Judge John Woodcock issued his ruling awarding Filler $1.77 million in damages for his illegal and immoral persecution by various authorities of the cities of Gouldsboro and Ellsworth, and Hancock and Washington counties. (The award is against a single person, Linda Gleason. Filler previously settled out of court with other defendants.) Perhaps more important than that award though was this statement in open court by Judge Woodcock:
And this is really, from a judicial perspective, it's just appalling. I can't say how sorry I am to you that you had such a terrible experience with the criminal justice system in this country and in this state. There's no excuse for what happened to you. I know that you were born in Kiev. Not far from Kiev is Prague. In Prague, there was an author named Franz Kafka, and he wrote a book called The Trial about a man who is subjected to a malicious and befuddling and horrific trial system, and, unfortunately, you're a living embodiment of what Franz Kafka wrote about. And I'm just terribly sorry it happened to you; there is just absolutely no excuse."
The final message of Filler’s story is that a person can, by being right, strong, calm and persistent, prevail over seemingly insuperable odds, over a system of state power that’s rigged against him.
I won’t reprise the facts of Filler’s case. I’ve written about it numerous times before. But here are a few of the people and “powers that be” over whom he prevailed:
His ex-wife who, fearing the loss of custody of their kids, leveled false allegations of sexual abuse and child abuse at him. Filler proved her allegations to be false and won sole custody of the children.
One assistant district attorney who prosecuted him for rape knowing him to be innocent of the charge. Filler proved himself to be innocent of the charge despite ADA Mary Kellett having lied to the police, lied to the judge, lied to the jury, lied to the press and violated the rules of procedure, the rules of evidence and at least seven ethical requirements for prosecutors. Filler’s persistence caused Kellett to resign her job as ADA and become the first and only prosecutor in the history of the state to be disciplined by the state bar association.
Numerous police officers who worked hand-in-glove with Kellett to try to railroad an innocent man into prison. Filler demonstrated their malfeasance in his civil suit against them. Rather than face a jury, the police settled that case out of court.
Filler prevailed in two attempts to find him guilty of criminal wrongdoing. He forced the state bar to discipline an assistant District Attorney and won significant money damages from numerous individuals and state entities. He is completely exonerated and they are disgraced. The only irony remaining is that the only person to yet apologize to Filler is Judge Woodcock, a man who’s never wronged him.
The criminal justice system is in many ways stacked against defendants. Even the innocent sometimes go to prison. But Vladek Filler proved that an innocent man can defeat the power of the state.
The family court system too is in many ways stacked against fathers, particularly when sexual assault allegations (i.e. the “silver bullet) are made against them. But Vladek Filler has proven that being in the right plus strength and perseverance can win the day.
For all those things, he stands as a beacon of hope to every innocent person who must confront and fight judicial systems that sometimes seem Kafkaesque.
Source
Vladek Filler took on the system and won. The same system that was designed to crush men like him. For that Vladek is a hero. He took on a corrupt system that hopefully is being disconnected and rendered useless. To prosecute,imprison and carry out sentences upon those at all levels of the organizations involved. We at the Men's Rights Blog salute Vladek Filler for taking on the gynocrisy and winning.
Thursday, March 14, 2019
The SPLC eats its own
The Southern Poverty Law Center has fired co-founder Morris Dees, the group announced Thursday.
“As a civil rights organization, the SPLC is committed to ensuring that the conduct of our staff reflects the mission of the organization and the values we hope to instill in the world,” SPLC president Richard Cohen said in a statement. “When one of our own fails to meet those standards, no matter his or her role in the organization, we take it seriously and must take appropriate action.”
Dees, 82, co-founded the SPLC in 1971 and was its chief litigator.
The Montgomery Advertiser, reporting on the Alabama-based organization in 1994, flagged concerns about its practices in an eight-part series that later earned a Pulitzer nomination.
The SPLC tracks hate groups in the U.S. and works to prevent discrimination against minorities, but the Advertiser‘s series aired allegations of discrimination against black employees, who “accused . . . Dees, the center’s driving force, of being a racist.”
Dees was also criticized in the Advertiser‘s reports of being “more focused on raising money than fighting injustice” even though he was also “a figure seen as heroic by some.” The organization had $450 million in assets in 2017, according to tax records.
By Thursday the group had removed Dees’s biography from their website, but his name and a description of his role remain in the summary of the organization’s history.
The group promised to take “a number of immediate, concrete next steps,” including having a third party conduct a “comprehensive assessment of our internal climate and workplace practices.” It did not specify what Dees had done to prompt his firing.
Source
“As a civil rights organization, the SPLC is committed to ensuring that the conduct of our staff reflects the mission of the organization and the values we hope to instill in the world,” SPLC president Richard Cohen said in a statement. “When one of our own fails to meet those standards, no matter his or her role in the organization, we take it seriously and must take appropriate action.”
Dees, 82, co-founded the SPLC in 1971 and was its chief litigator.
The Montgomery Advertiser, reporting on the Alabama-based organization in 1994, flagged concerns about its practices in an eight-part series that later earned a Pulitzer nomination.
The SPLC tracks hate groups in the U.S. and works to prevent discrimination against minorities, but the Advertiser‘s series aired allegations of discrimination against black employees, who “accused . . . Dees, the center’s driving force, of being a racist.”
Dees was also criticized in the Advertiser‘s reports of being “more focused on raising money than fighting injustice” even though he was also “a figure seen as heroic by some.” The organization had $450 million in assets in 2017, according to tax records.
By Thursday the group had removed Dees’s biography from their website, but his name and a description of his role remain in the summary of the organization’s history.
The group promised to take “a number of immediate, concrete next steps,” including having a third party conduct a “comprehensive assessment of our internal climate and workplace practices.” It did not specify what Dees had done to prompt his firing.
Source
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Tucker Carlson stands his ground
Some bullshit tapes about how Tucker Carlson spoke his mind about women recently surfaced. Feminists who have said horrid things about men are demanding Tucker apologize. Unlike Greg Gutless,Tucker stood his ground and told them to go fuck themselves. In an age where conservative men like Sean Hannity play the white knight Tucker is a man and a realist. For that Tucker Carlson we at the Men's Rights Blog salute you.
Sunday, March 3, 2019
Saturday, March 2, 2019
Gutfeld and his guests weigh in on the draft and the NCFM
On tonight's Greg Gutfeld Show (March 2,2019) the subject of the draft came up with the National Coalition For Men
and their victory in this case. One of the guests Emily Campagno,federal prosecutor and Raiderette cheerleader. Shot down the idea of women being drafted. Host Greg Gutfeld also mocked it. In that case perhaps women shouldn't have civil liberties if they are going to act like arrogant bitches. If women don't want to serve their country then perhaps they should not work outside the home and do as men tell them.
Gutfeld is scared of his wife so that is expected. One of the guests did surprise me in his reaction. That is Tyrus. I thought Tyrus would be sympathetic to the man's rights cause.
Sunday, February 24, 2019
Feminist's son accused in sexual assault
Hollywood Feminist CEO Quits ‘Believing the Women’ After Son Accused of Sexual Assault
By Pluralist | Feb 24, 2019
“All of our actions were fully guided by our support for survivors.”
The CEO of a prominent new anti-sexual harassment organization abruptly resigned after her own son was accused of sexual assault.
Lisa Borders stepped down last week within 24 hours of telling the leadership of Time’s Up about the allegations against her 36-year-old son. The president and first CEO of the group, which came out of the #MeToo movement, she had been on the job for just three months.
Borders and Time’s Up announced that she was leaving in a joint statement posted to Instagram Monday, but they did not mention the reason. Only on Thursday, after the Los Angeles Times reported on the sexual assault allegations, did Time’s Up release a second statement admitting why Borders had resigned.
“All of our actions were fully guided by our support for survivors,” the second statement said.
Borders, a former WNBA president, told Time’s Up that she planned to aggressively defend her son, which put her at odds with the group’s stated ethos of believing women who claim sexual abuse, according to The Washington Post.
An unnamed Santa Monica woman told the Los Angeles Times that Borders’ son, a self-described life coach named Garry “Dijon” Bowden Jr., gave her a sexually inappropriate “healing session,” which left her surprised and feeling “violated.” She accused him of touching her genitals, kissing her neck, and brushing his erect penis against her body through his clothes.
Bowden Jr.’s lawyer, Alan Jackson, disputed the woman’s version of events. He shared with The Post text messages that Bowden and the woman exchanged after the session in which the woman thanked his client for the “gentle and authentic loving.”
In an interview with InStyle last month, Borders described her son as her version “2.0,” a “better version [of me] than I would ever be: more competent, confident and compassionate.”
Times’s Up, which has its own hashtag, was founded last year by women in the increasingly woke entertainment industry . The group been touted by Hollywood actresses at awards shows, with some walking the red carpet wearing black and a Time’s Up pin accompanied by survivors of sexual assault.
The Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, housed by the National Women’s Law Center Fund, has helped employees and McDonald’s and Walmart file sexual harassment claims and dispersed about $750,000 in grants to nonprofits that work with low-wage workers who have alleged sexual harassment and workplace retaliation.
In January, the group launched an initiative – #TimesUpX2 and #4PercentChallenge – to get Hollywood studios to commit to hiring women as directors and to double the number of female leaders in other industries.
Source
That reminds me of this.I wonder if they are the same case?
By Pluralist | Feb 24, 2019
“All of our actions were fully guided by our support for survivors.”
The CEO of a prominent new anti-sexual harassment organization abruptly resigned after her own son was accused of sexual assault.
Lisa Borders stepped down last week within 24 hours of telling the leadership of Time’s Up about the allegations against her 36-year-old son. The president and first CEO of the group, which came out of the #MeToo movement, she had been on the job for just three months.
Borders and Time’s Up announced that she was leaving in a joint statement posted to Instagram Monday, but they did not mention the reason. Only on Thursday, after the Los Angeles Times reported on the sexual assault allegations, did Time’s Up release a second statement admitting why Borders had resigned.
“All of our actions were fully guided by our support for survivors,” the second statement said.
Borders, a former WNBA president, told Time’s Up that she planned to aggressively defend her son, which put her at odds with the group’s stated ethos of believing women who claim sexual abuse, according to The Washington Post.
An unnamed Santa Monica woman told the Los Angeles Times that Borders’ son, a self-described life coach named Garry “Dijon” Bowden Jr., gave her a sexually inappropriate “healing session,” which left her surprised and feeling “violated.” She accused him of touching her genitals, kissing her neck, and brushing his erect penis against her body through his clothes.
Bowden Jr.’s lawyer, Alan Jackson, disputed the woman’s version of events. He shared with The Post text messages that Bowden and the woman exchanged after the session in which the woman thanked his client for the “gentle and authentic loving.”
In an interview with InStyle last month, Borders described her son as her version “2.0,” a “better version [of me] than I would ever be: more competent, confident and compassionate.”
Times’s Up, which has its own hashtag, was founded last year by women in the increasingly woke entertainment industry . The group been touted by Hollywood actresses at awards shows, with some walking the red carpet wearing black and a Time’s Up pin accompanied by survivors of sexual assault.
The Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, housed by the National Women’s Law Center Fund, has helped employees and McDonald’s and Walmart file sexual harassment claims and dispersed about $750,000 in grants to nonprofits that work with low-wage workers who have alleged sexual harassment and workplace retaliation.
In January, the group launched an initiative – #TimesUpX2 and #4PercentChallenge – to get Hollywood studios to commit to hiring women as directors and to double the number of female leaders in other industries.
Source
That reminds me of this.I wonder if they are the same case?
Forcing only men to sign up for Selective Service has been ruled as gender discrimination against men
The National Coalition For Men (NCFM) is pleased with the court’s decision in NCFM v. Selective Service. Forcing only males to register is an aspect of socially institutionalized male disposability and helps reinforce the stereotypes that support discrimination against men in other areas such as child custody, divorce, criminal sentencing, paternity fraud, education, public benefits, domestic violence services, due process rights, genital autonomy, and more.
“Women are now allowed in combat, so this decision is long overdue,” said Marc Angelucci, attorney for NCFM. “After decades of sex discrimination against men in the Selective Service, the courts have finally found it unconstitutional to force only men to register. Even without a draft, men still face prison, fines, and denial of federal loans for not registering or for not updating the government of their whereabouts. Since women will be required to register with the Selective Service, they should face the same repercussions as men for any noncompliance.”
Source
Then there is this:
Only Drafting Men in War Is Gender ‘Discrimination,’ Federal Judge Rules
By Pluralist | Feb 25, 2019
“They’re hollering they don’t have equal ‘rights.'”
A federal judge in Texas ruled Friday than an all-male military draft is unconstitutional given that women can now serve in combat roles just as men do.
Judge Gray H. Miller of Federal District Court in the Southern District of Texas noted that the Supreme Court’s 1981 ruling in favor of excluding women from the draft was based on the fact that women could not be combat soldiers. But the Pentagon opened up all military roles to women in 2015.
“While historical restrictions on women in the military may have justified past discrimination, men and women are now ‘similarly situated for purposes of a draft or registration for a draft,’” Judge Miller wrote in his ruling. “If there ever was a time to discuss ‘the place of women in the Armed Services,’ that time has passed.”
Miller said Congress has never fully examined whether men are physically better able to serve than women. In fact, he noted in a footnote, “the average woman could conceivably be better suited physically for some of today’s combat positions than the average man, depending on which skills the position required. Combat roles no longer uniformly require sheer size or muscle.”
Miller’s ruling was declaratory, and it did not specify any action that the government must take to comply. It comes as an 11-member advisory panel, the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service, is studying the draft system, considering whether it should continue and whether women should be included.
The case was brought by a men’s right group, and two men who argued an all-male draft violates the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection clause. Although there has not be a US military draft in 40 years, men who fail to register with the Selective Service System at their 18th birthday can be denied public benefits such as federal employment and student loans. Women cannot register for Selective Service.
The group, called the National Coalition For Men, cheered the ruling.
“We think it’s about time since women are allowed in combat,” Marc E. Angelucci, a lawyer for the National Coalition for Men, said. “If we have draft registration, both sexes should have to register. There’s really no more excuse to require only men to register.”
Many conservatives called the decision a logical result of the feminist campaign for equal rights, which in the #MeToo era has focused on combating workplace inequality.
Source
“Women are now allowed in combat, so this decision is long overdue,” said Marc Angelucci, attorney for NCFM. “After decades of sex discrimination against men in the Selective Service, the courts have finally found it unconstitutional to force only men to register. Even without a draft, men still face prison, fines, and denial of federal loans for not registering or for not updating the government of their whereabouts. Since women will be required to register with the Selective Service, they should face the same repercussions as men for any noncompliance.”
Source
Then there is this:
Only Drafting Men in War Is Gender ‘Discrimination,’ Federal Judge Rules
By Pluralist | Feb 25, 2019
“They’re hollering they don’t have equal ‘rights.'”
A federal judge in Texas ruled Friday than an all-male military draft is unconstitutional given that women can now serve in combat roles just as men do.
Judge Gray H. Miller of Federal District Court in the Southern District of Texas noted that the Supreme Court’s 1981 ruling in favor of excluding women from the draft was based on the fact that women could not be combat soldiers. But the Pentagon opened up all military roles to women in 2015.
“While historical restrictions on women in the military may have justified past discrimination, men and women are now ‘similarly situated for purposes of a draft or registration for a draft,’” Judge Miller wrote in his ruling. “If there ever was a time to discuss ‘the place of women in the Armed Services,’ that time has passed.”
Miller said Congress has never fully examined whether men are physically better able to serve than women. In fact, he noted in a footnote, “the average woman could conceivably be better suited physically for some of today’s combat positions than the average man, depending on which skills the position required. Combat roles no longer uniformly require sheer size or muscle.”
Miller’s ruling was declaratory, and it did not specify any action that the government must take to comply. It comes as an 11-member advisory panel, the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service, is studying the draft system, considering whether it should continue and whether women should be included.
The case was brought by a men’s right group, and two men who argued an all-male draft violates the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection clause. Although there has not be a US military draft in 40 years, men who fail to register with the Selective Service System at their 18th birthday can be denied public benefits such as federal employment and student loans. Women cannot register for Selective Service.
The group, called the National Coalition For Men, cheered the ruling.
“We think it’s about time since women are allowed in combat,” Marc E. Angelucci, a lawyer for the National Coalition for Men, said. “If we have draft registration, both sexes should have to register. There’s really no more excuse to require only men to register.”
Many conservatives called the decision a logical result of the feminist campaign for equal rights, which in the #MeToo era has focused on combating workplace inequality.
Source
Sunday, February 10, 2019
Feminazism-literally
PASADENA, Calif. – Alyssa Milano isn't giving up an inch of the progress women in Hollywood have made since the #MeToo era began.
The actress, who helped spread the hashtag in the wake of sexual harassment and assault allegations against film mogul Harvey Weinstein, spoke Sunday to reporters at the Television Critics Association along with other female Lifetime actors, producers and directors, about the state of the industry. When asked what happens when men accused of misconduct re-enter the workplace, Milano wasn't concerned.
"That’s going to happen," she said, when a reporter asked about reports that ousted CBS chairman Leslie Moonves has set up a new production company. "We can’t expect that not to happen. We can’t put all these men on an island and expect them to eat themselves. They’re going to get jobs again. We have to figure out (what) re-entering into the workplace looks like. ... We have to set policies."
Milano advocated for strong contracts and internal resources to curb the power of these men.
"I also think that’s contractual as well," she said. "If you’re funding Les Moonves or working with him, I think you need have an ironclad contract." She also suggested using human-resources experts that are "maybe external not internal. ... I think if anything we have proved if you speak up you can hold people accountable for their abuses of power."
Milano isn't worried that progress made since #MeToo began will be undone.
"I won’t allow anyone to go back."
Source
This is Nazism. This is Fascism. This Italiana reminds me of an Italiano by the name of Benito Mussolini. She has declared war on men I say we take steps to maximize our safety. I will not elaborate beyond that.
If I read that right she is endorsing gendercide. She is endorsing concentration camps and prisons like Devil's Island. She is Benita Mussolini. I definitely see a parallel between her vile and the Nuremberg Laws which stripped Jews of their rights. I say we defend ourselves. Do not underestimate metoo.
The actress, who helped spread the hashtag in the wake of sexual harassment and assault allegations against film mogul Harvey Weinstein, spoke Sunday to reporters at the Television Critics Association along with other female Lifetime actors, producers and directors, about the state of the industry. When asked what happens when men accused of misconduct re-enter the workplace, Milano wasn't concerned.
"That’s going to happen," she said, when a reporter asked about reports that ousted CBS chairman Leslie Moonves has set up a new production company. "We can’t expect that not to happen. We can’t put all these men on an island and expect them to eat themselves. They’re going to get jobs again. We have to figure out (what) re-entering into the workplace looks like. ... We have to set policies."
Milano advocated for strong contracts and internal resources to curb the power of these men.
"I also think that’s contractual as well," she said. "If you’re funding Les Moonves or working with him, I think you need have an ironclad contract." She also suggested using human-resources experts that are "maybe external not internal. ... I think if anything we have proved if you speak up you can hold people accountable for their abuses of power."
Milano isn't worried that progress made since #MeToo began will be undone.
"I won’t allow anyone to go back."
Source
This is Nazism. This is Fascism. This Italiana reminds me of an Italiano by the name of Benito Mussolini. She has declared war on men I say we take steps to maximize our safety. I will not elaborate beyond that.
If I read that right she is endorsing gendercide. She is endorsing concentration camps and prisons like Devil's Island. She is Benita Mussolini. I definitely see a parallel between her vile and the Nuremberg Laws which stripped Jews of their rights. I say we defend ourselves. Do not underestimate metoo.
Thursday, February 7, 2019
The First Marijuana Hearing Of The New Congress Has Been Scheduled
Has been moved to my Among Other Things blog.
Monday, January 21, 2019
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
The new shipment just came in
I'm looking forward to seeing it in action. You could use it immediately but in the event that you don't just give it to someone you don't like.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)