Los Angeles, CA -- On June 15, at the Los Angeles Law Library, Dennis Ettlin and Daniel Cooper announce the filing of 8 civil law suits against 8 Los Angeles County judges. The 8 civil suits seek $38 million for civil rights violations and damages for prejudice against fathers. The lawsuits highlight judicial bias bought by L.A. County bribes and begin a fourth prong in the campaign to stop judicial bribes in California. The first effort by Judicial Watch succeeded with the Sturgeon I and II cases in getting the bribes ruled un-constitutional. The second effort, on April 13th, was the Judicial Watch demand for District Attorney Steve Cooley to seek the return of $350 million to the county.
The third prong is a legal challenge to void the orders of bribed judges.
The Appellate Court, in its Sturgeon II decision, called for this fourth effort. This first wave of law suits holds the judges personally liable for the loss of constitutional rights and for damages from the specific biases favoring Los Angeles County. All citizens of California are the victims of this “fraud on the court” and the biases perpetrated by judges.
The eight civil lawsuits name 5 L.A. Superior Court judges and 3 Appellate Court judges. Damages are sought for denial of the constitutional rights to due process and for specific damages due to biases in family law, traffic fines,domestic violence and gender discrimination. Our goal is to have a citizen jury re-affirm the illegality of the judicial bribes and to begin the process of compensating the victims. Further info is located at:click here
Original press release:click here
Way to go NCFM-LA,this is indeed good news and I never tire of reading good news. Congrats again because you guys deserve it. For the table listing the judges ,their bribes and the money they got sued for click next to "original press release".
1 comment:
I am so glad to hear of this lawsuit. NH has some of the worst corruption within the family court system and is extremely biased against fathers. I hope that NH can soon follow suit here. Visit the blog “NH Attorney Jaye Rancourt An Unethical Attorney” at http://unethicalattorney.blogspot.com/ to see the amount of corruption that goes on in family court.
A good majority of biased decisions are against men. What it boils down to is the family court is a multibillion dollar business. Every time the state collects money for child support, they receive funds from the federal government for their actions. This gives the judges a good reason to order support and not to have shared custody.
Traditionally men have been the bread winners of the household so the judges tend to target them for support. Child support helps to fund the states corrupt practices as a source of income for these people. They are essentially funding themselves.
Imagine if every time you went to your bank and made a deposit, the federal government matched your deposit dollar for dollar. Wouldn’t you have an incentive to make deposits into your local bank? That is what states like NH are doing at the cost of our children. This needs to stop.
Post a Comment