U.S. Senate candidate goes through misandric system

Maine Senate GOP Challenger: Domestic Violence Conviction Shows Integrity
Daniel Strauss – January 3, 2014, 2:15 PM EST12827

A conservative candidate running against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) in the Republican primary argued that his decision to fight his domestic violence conviction in court showed his integrity.

The candidate, Erick Bennett, a consultant in Portland who worked on the anti-marriage equality push in 2012, made the argument Monday at a press conference. He discussed his Senate campaign, his time serving for Maine Gov. Paul LePage's (R) campaign in 2010 and his domestic violence conviction.

"The fact that I have been jailed repeatedly for not agreeing to admit to something I didn’t do should speak to the fact of how much guts and integrity I have," Bennett said. "I've noticed some people questioning that."

In 2003 Bennett was convicted of attacking his then-wife. A district court convicted him of Class D Assault. Bennett fought the conviction but in 2004 a Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the lower court "sufficient evidence does exist in the record to support his conviction," according to the Bangor Daily News. At the press conference Bennett stressed his innocence.

Bennett went on to say that that his time in jail demonstrates how much character he has.

"If I go to D.C., I'm going to have that same integrity in doing what I say, and saying what I do, when it comes to protecting people's rights, as well as their pocketbooks," Bennett continued, according to the Daily News.

Source

To contact Erick Bennett

Erick Bennett video

From Fatherless America:

Published on Jan 25, 2014

The feminist apparatchiks are out to silence and destroy this man whose message threatens their hegemony. Erick Bennett is a U.S. Senate candidate from Maine who 10 years ago was falsely accused and convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence charge. He set out to fight for change and unlike the mainstream media he has been telling it how it is. The mainstream media's response? Hit job after hit job after hit job calling him names and telling people again and again to just "ignore" him. Amanda Marcotte at Salon attacked Bennett for even challenging his false conviction and for making claims that men get railroaded in court. Erika Eichelberger at Mother Jones apparently made Bennett feel comfortable enough to grant her an interview before she turned around and published a hit piece titled "I will kill you" and going so far as to publish his ex-wife's ludicrous 10 year old statement/fable to police as if somehow that makes it a fact. What the media is really saying is don't pay any attention to that man telling the truth from behind the curtain about how things really work.

Source

AVFM Radio with guest Erick Bennett

I was listening to A Voice For Men Radio when Erick Bennett who is running for U.S. Senate from Maine was a guest on the show. In fact I wrote about Bennett here. I thought James Huff and Robert O'Hara did a good job interviewing Bennett. I thought it was very good. It's refreshing to see a candidate for public office that is not hyped up on misandry and/or in NOW's pocket. If you haven't listened do so it is a good talk radio show and gives us hope that those of us who believe in the truth will prevail over those that spread lies and terror.

Reminder about the Maine Republican primary

The Maine Republican primary is coming up and pro-male candidate Erick Bennett needs your help. He is running against incumbent Senator Susan Collins. If he gets the votes he will be the first pro-MRA candidate in the race for Senate. I don't need to tell you this is big. But he won't go anywhere without your vote. If you are registered to vote in the State of Maine on June 10 and are able to vote for Bennett in the primary then by all means do so. The faster we get a pro-MRA into the Senate the faster we can turn the misandry around. For more information about Erick Bennett: click here

The hit piece on JTO that should have never been published

I was at A Voice For Men and I was reading an article which state that JTO is a traitor. I always thought JTO was a loyal MRA so this can't be true. I read the article,links and everything. If you haven't read this then by all means do read it. The article is by Diana Davison. So if you haven't read it then do so. Now that you've read the article you can see why I'm not too fond of this. First of all JTO is innocent of the charges against him and he was falsely accused by a drama queen. The point is this should have never been published. What was the purpose? You were bored and wanted to stir shit up? That is how we got here: bored women who wanted to stir shit up. One of the posters there echoed what I've been saying about women in the movement and this proves it. I noticed the women on A Voice For Men are blaming men for not understanding it is satire. Again men are attacked for "not getting it". Where have we heard that before? The point is the article does nothing but cause division and division at this time is not good for the movement.

Update: Here is Diana Davison's response to those that "misinterpret" her article. It is either she wanted to go after JTO,had second thoughts and is now trying to play this off as a joke or she sucks as a writer. Read the following:


Diana Davison says

February 1, 2014 at 1:37 PM

“the canyon of my despair”
“a flimsy staple gun that is somehow shooting

seven inch nails.”
“Why, John?…For the love of all good things,

WHY?”
“What are they paying you, John? And was it

worth your soul?”
“I am still too mortified and embittered to

feign the proper etiquette.”
“there is a small chance John the Other is not

dead to us.”
“It is entirely feasible that JtO hasn’t

actually abandoned the ship for a douche canoe

after all.”

“Run, John, run!”

Those are just a few of the reasons this is obvious satire. If anyone doesn’t see that, there isn’t much I can do to help them. It would be like trying to teach Borat to use the word “NOT!”

If feminists want to try and use this article to claim the MRM is falling apart it would be the funniest thing that could happen. I hope they do.

Source

No,it is not obvious. A lot of questions being asked by those outside of AVFM are being attacked. Blame and deflect. Typical feminist's tactics. I wouldn't trust these women for anything. It's all about them and if AVFM let them these same female "allies?" will put knives in the backs of those white knights and manginas that they will have a major WTF moment.

Update: this article is published after the interview with pro-male candidate Erick Bennett (see preceeding post) who is running to be U.S. Senator for Maine. I find it very interesting that this piece was published after that interview. An interview that gained ground and now this piece is published. A piece that is divisive. Notice how the women are defending each other and discounting what the men have to say. Like usual a lot of guys are playing white knight/mangina games by agreeing with the women. AVFM appears to have been infiltrated by the feminists.Coincidence? I don't think so. At Least that is what the circumstantial evidence shows.

Tomorrow is the Maine Primary election

Tomorrow is the Maine primary election and there is a pro-male candidate,Erick Bennett,in the running. More information here.