The Obama-Kagan connection

I received an email that details very shocking information about this administration; its cronymism and Chicago style politics. It would also shed light on how Elena Kagan became a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. Here it is:

Received In An Email
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 11:39 PM


----- Original Message -----

Subject: FW: SNOPES AND OBAMA-KAGAN RELATIONSHIP EXPOSED


Obama is crooked as a snake. He should not have appointed this conflict-of-interest Kagan to the Supreme Court, and Congress surely should have picked up on this relationship and denied Obama this Kagan appointment!


Subject: fw:SNOPES EXPOSED
Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011, 7:20 PM


I heard years ago that Snopes was a left-wing operation and found it odd that there was absolutely nothing negative to be found there about Obama when he was running for President. I should have known that George Sorros was behind them, too.


Most of us have gone to Snopes for verify information that we were not sure about. Now, come to find out, Snopes is not the paragon of truth we thought it was. I just eliminated them as a source of honesty and integrity.



Please read and pass on to your email friends.
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a huge financial supporter of Obama!


In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have
suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check out "Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets." Snopes said there were no such dockets, so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what?



Yep you got it. Snopes lied. Everyone of those dockets are there. So Here is what I wrote Snopes:



Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:

The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Court's website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to.

I have long suspected that you really slant things but
this revelation is really shocking. You exist behind a veil of half truths and distorted facts.


Hoping you will be honest and forthcoming in the future is probably expecting too much.
That being said, if you really didn't know THIS then your
investigative reporting is a sham;
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now that he has appointed her to the Suprene Court , she may help rule on them! Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics--and the beat goes on and on and on...


Once again the US Senate sold us out! Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.



Pull up the Supreme Court's website, go to the docket and search for Obama. Kagan was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her
big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard! It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It all comes down to payback
time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no right to even be there.


Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: When you look up some of these hearings, guess what?Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:



http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search..aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


If you are not interested in truth or justice,
delete this. However, If you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by God and the U.S. Constitution, by all means, please PASS IT ON. I DID MY PART!

So did I. This is big and it certainly explains a lot. Journalistic integrity seems to be an oxymoron these days. The only way for any journalist with integrity to get their views known to the public is on the internet and more people are turning to the net in record numbers. When you look at what passes for "news" these days you'll want to get on the net PDQ and is it any wonder? Not to me.