On matriarchal society

Let's take a look at today's society. A few days ago some women did a sting on planned parenthood in which they asked the abortionist if they could abort the child because it was a girl and the abortionist said that was no problem. This organization got a lot of media exposure and comparing what was on the video to China and their preference for male children. What about male children? I wonder how many boys have been aborted because of their gender? Everyone points to China and its large male population but forget about America and its large female population. Certainly not all the men died in wars others died in other ways perhaps some of those were boys who were never given a chance at life. I sure the abortionist would have aborted a boy if asked but that wouldn't be done,certainly not by this organization because of its female preference. This story got exposure on O'Reilly which gave O'Reilly a chance to play white knight once again. But that brings us back to the original question: what about boys? Would some organization send in someone posing as a radical feminist who wanted to abort her unborn son? We are inundated by some so-called "war on women" that we forget the very real war on men. This blog is dedicated to exposing that war and fighting misandry. To give an example let's take the case of Desmond Hatchett,the man who fathered 30 children and has trouble paying child support. The reaction to Hatchett's situation has been extreme some even calling for Hatchett's castration. No one blames the women who had unprotected sex with Hatchett and to the best of my knowledge he hasn't been accused of rape so it appears the women were willing. On the other hand when Sandra Fluke demanded that we all pick up the tab for her birth control no one said to give her a hysterectomy. Rush Limbaugh made a comment that he didn't think the taxpayers should pick up the tab and for that he was crucified. So let me get this straight. A man who states he doesn't want to pay for someone else's birth control is worse than women who make castration threats? Sounds very loopy to me. What we have in America is a matriarchy that is basically one big S&M trip. With the women as the queen bees and men as the eunuch workers. The queens issue the orders and the pussywhipped enforcers carry out those orders. It's dominatrix/slave trip that the matriarchy has imposed upon us.

NOW protests Limbaugh

The full force of NOW (National Organization for Wretched Hags) is coming down on Rush Limbaugh. Yep,all 7 NOW members plus Sandra Fluke so that makes 8 pissed off femihags coming after Rush. The funny part is that NOW claims to be 500,000 members strong. What happened to the rest of the 499,993? Did ACORN oversee the NOW membership drive? ACORN believes why should voting be limited to real,living citizens? Why can't the dead vote? Why can't imaginary creatures and illegal aliens? I'm sure they used these methods to inflate the membership of NOW. Let's take a look at the NOW gang,all 7 of them. I'm sure Fluke is with them in spirit or maybe she's putting her birth control to work. Who knows.



Notice the spokeswoman has no problem owning up to the fact that her gender makes most of the purchasing decisions. That didn't sound like the victimization we usually hear from NOW. No it sounded like a tool of empowerment. A tool in which they can imply the following: do as we say and nobody gets hurt. But that's the problem. Even time NOW does something men and boys get hurt and that has to change.

Thanks to Christian J for hipping me to this:click here.

Just say no to Jane and Gloria

Jane Fonda with the Viet Cong in Viet Nam

Jane Fonda and Gloria Steinem want to censor Rush Limbaugh for his comments concerning Sandra Fluke. First of all Rush has the right to say what he wants as the 1st Amendment gives him that right,whether Fonda or Steinem like it or not. If these two are such champions of "doing the right thing" then perhaps Hanoi Jane can do some time for her treasonous acts against the United States during a time of war, specifically the Viet Nam War. If a man has done what Hanoi Jane did he would have been sentenced for treason and quite possibly dead by now. If Steinem has no problem with censorship then she doesn't mind if feminist forums and blogs are censored. After all there is a lot of evil things said on these forums and blogs,the Agent Orange files prove this. So how about it you two? Do you want to play censorship where both sides are shut down or do you just want to continue to talk out of your asses,demonstrating your hypocrisy? I already have a feeling I know which one you'll choose.