Lying feminist senator caught lying

From our California correspondent:

I was reading at Senator Barbara Boxers' website that women earned less than men. I wrote to her to let her know that that is not true. Here is that letter:

Greetings Senator Boxer,

I read your tweet where you stated: "Women have to work more than 3 extra months to match what men earn every year. That’s unacceptable. Time to close the pay gap." http://www.boxer.senate.gov/

That is incorrect,Senator. Dr. Warren Farrell has proven in his book,"Why Men Earn More" that feminists have fudged the numbers. They were comparing women's part time work to men's full time work and calling them the same. Farrell has also pointed out there are cases where women have earned more however the feminists are silent when this is brought up. In fact here is a link to that book: http://www.amazon.com/Why-Men-Earn-More-Startling/dp/0814472109#reader_0814472109

In fact Farrell points out that there is a wage gap that favors women over men. That is unacceptable.

Thank you for your time concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX,
Men's Rights Activist,Registered Voter
and Concerned Citizen

Good work,bro. We have to keep them honest and correcting them when they make statements that are out of line. The pay gap myth that disfavors women doesn't exist meanwhile the one that discriminates against men is very real.

My take on the University of Toranto MRA situation

I was watching one of the videos on A Voice For Men where John The Other is talking with one of the protesters and that protester said We were going all Merriam Webster on him. Sounds like to me he said to throw the dictionary out the window. Fine. Let's do that. When they were calling AVFM personnel "rape apologists" they must have meant "these are great people fighting for a legitimate cause". I mean if there is no definitions they mean the same thing? Right? When you get down to it "male feminist" could easily mean "child rapist". Is there a difference? No dictionary,no difference. A lot of the protesters also wore disguises. Why? To instigate violence? Perhaps. That is how they operate through intimidation and violence. At the original protest one man who was trying to makes sense of his friends' suicide by listening to Warren Farrell is instead labeled a "rapist scumbag" by some twobit whore whose personality is so acerbic that it could dissolve petrified wood. She's the type of woman that could make a man make a commitment-to remain a bachelor. Also at Farrell's event a male protester is a stoned out asshole. If you're going to take 17 bonghits and still act like you have a stick up your ass then you are a fucked up asshole to the bone,especially if you are going to serve evil and feminism is evil. Then there is big red: ultra obnoxious feminist cunt. This is the type that could turn an unbias man into a misogynist. She's also the type to have a lot of cats,no dates and has vibrator repair on speed dial.

JTO and other AVFM personnel go into the belly of the beast

Join John The Other and other people from AVFM as they attempt to talk to the feminist protesters aka the Toranto Terrorists. One of the Terrorists would like to see harm come to JTO which would make that feminist are true terrorist. Anyway click here for more.

New Jared White video

NCFM sues over anti-male bias in selective service requirements

NCFM SUES SELECTIVE SERVICE FOR REQUIRING ONLY MEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT

April 4, 2013
By NCFM

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Marc Angelucci, Esq., NCFM Vice President, marcangelucci@hotmail.com 626-319-3081

Or, Steven Svoboda, Esq., NCFM PR Director, arc@post.harvard.edu 925-395-2065

NATIONAL COALITION FOR MEN SUES SELECTIVE SERVICE FOR REQUIRING ONLY MEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT

Lawsuit Asserts Department of Defense’s Recent Repeal of Ban on Women in Combat Removes Lone Legal Obstacle for Requiring Women to Register for Draft

Los Angeles (4/4/13) – The National Coalition For Men (NCFM) is a non-profit educational organization that advocates for equal rights for men and women.

NCFM has filed a lawsuit that challenges the legality of requiring only males to register for the military draft. The lawsuit was filed against the U.S. Selective Service System in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on April 4, 2013, Case Number 2:13-cv-02391-DSF-MAN .

The 1981 U.S. Supreme Court equal protection case of Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981) held that men and women were not similarly situated in the U.S. military because women were excluded from combat, therefore women did not have to register for the draft. Dissenting Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote, “The Court today places its imprimatur on one of the most potent remaining public expressions of ‘ancient canards about the proper role of women’.”

In January, U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced that women will be allowed to enter all combat positions in all branches of the U.S. military, thereby removing the sole legal basis for requiring only males to register for the draft.

NCFM’s complaint alleges that because men and women are now similarly situated in the military, Selective Service’s requirement that only males must register for the draft violates the rights of both men and women to equal treatment under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and under United States Code, Title 28, Section 1983.

Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief, calling for the Selective Service to stop discriminating against men and women by requiring both men and women to register for the draft, or by requiring neither to register for the draft.

Men failing to register for the draft can be fined up to $250,000, sentenced to up to five years in prison, and denied eligibility for federal and state benefits including jobs, financial aid, citizenship, loans, and job training. Only men now face these harsh penalties.

NCFM calls on the Obama Administration and Congress to end the institutional sex discrimination that requires only men to register for the draft. The ancient canard is gone, because women are now eligible for combat roles in all branches of the U.S. military. There is no longer any legal justification for continuing the unequal treatment of our draft age population based solely on their gender. The Selective Service System should treat men and women equally, including imposing penalties against both men and women for failing to register.

Read the complaint here

Source: click here

Go NCFM Go. I've been waiting a long time for this and I'm glad it has happening. Why should men be the only ones to die in a war. If women want rights they should fight for them as any man would. Fair is fair.

Right back at fooltrelle

I see Dave Fooltrelle doesn't leave well enough alone. While it's true I've known about his hit piece on my post Why the militancy ? for a while I didn't get to post it is because there were more serious issues to men to deal with,more serious than fooltrelle. I try to save the jokes or absurdities until last and now it's "last" time so here we go. First of all fooltrelle's crowd is either lesbian feminists or wannabes like fooltrelle. What is the first thing they did? They magnify the fuck out of an insignificant misspelling. Never once did they debate my decision with rational thought. There were some that said my math skills are questionable but keep in mind that I wrote Why the militancy in 2007. Fooltrelle did his hit piece in 2012. Now who's the idiot. Dave,do you know I wrote a Follow-up to Why the militancy? Why didn't you include it? Fear? It must be,it's in your eyes. The only poster there that made any sense was a guy by the screenname from Montreal who exposed a bigger mangina than fooltrelle. Yeah,I didn't think that would be possible either but it's true. Anyway if fooltrelle's crowd wants it that way.

To those that think I'm exaggerating about feminazis read here and here. Dispute those quotes,if you can.

Here is your fearless leader:

Re-elect Mitch McConnell

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell

Why am I mentioning Senator McConnell? Because he is one of the 22 Senators that stood up to the feminazi bullies and voted against VAWA. He remembered us now it is time we help him. If you are an MRA and a resident of Kentucky or allowed to vote there re-elect Mitch McConnell. Not only that but McConnell is big supporter of the other Senator from Kentucky,Rand Paul. Like I said if McConnell is defeated then some liberal Obama-loving,feminist loving democrat will take his place. You want that? I don't. So like I said if you are able to do so re-elect Mitch McConnell.