Saturday, November 17, 2007

What's next,the electric chair?

Marc H. Rudov
Don't Tase Me, Babe!
November 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm · Filed under Vox Populi

Presumptive Predators

In case you didn't know, October was “Domestic Violence Awareness Month,” during which Americans were startled to learn that women are just as likely as men to commit domestic violence. Mention this at a party, and you'll find yourself standing alone at the punchbowl for the rest of the night: people just don't want to hear it. Sugar and spice, remember?

Because of VAWA (Violence Against Women Act), American men are presumptively and, therefore, unconstitutionally tagged as predators. Men must face a feminist justice system of proving innocence, instead of being protected by the US Constitution, which requires prosecutors to prove guilt. They have Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) to thank for this -- just ask the three exonerated lacrosse players from Duke University. And, what happened to Crystal Gail Mangum, the woman who was protected by an unconstitutional rape-shield law after she falsely accused them of rape? The same thing that happens to all fraudulent rape accusers: nothing. What do the feminist presidential candidates (Hillary and the men) have to say about this: nothing. How many of you men in Delaware will reelect Joe Biden?

The misandrist climate doesn't end there. Because of IMBRA, the unconstitutional law that Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) sponsored, American men are considered dangerous to foreign women. That's right, foreign women in foreign countries now have more American rights than American men living in America. Because of IMBRA, foreign women now have the power to demand unilateral background checks on American men before dating them. Worse, they can do whatever they want with this confidential information. How many of you men in Kansas will reelect Sam Brownback?

The Shocking Truth

Enter the “Taser for ladies,” available in metallic pink for $350 from Taser International, Inc., in Scottsdale, AZ. A news item on Fox News described the latest fad: women having Taser parties, redolent of Tupperware parties, where they get each other to purchase these weapons. Do women sometimes find themselves in dangerous situations where they need protection? Absolutely.(Of course the term "dangerous" is left for the woman to exclusively define and act upon. I'm sure Mary Winkler thought it would be "dangerous" for her husband to find out she wrote bad checks so to "protect" herself she murdered him.) Because of VAWA, do women have the potential to fraudulently use Tasers, with impunity -- in arguments, in rages, out of jealousy, for spite, in revenge, etc. -- to commit legal assault and battery on innocent men? You bet they do!

A Taser purchaser must register with and get approval from the company. What about training, though? If she uses it, where on a man's body will she aim it? Is she liable for any harm to him? Is she obligated to get him medical attention? According to the company Website: TASER® energy weapons are not considered firearms — they're legal to carry in most states without permits (including California). They are restricted from citizen use in MA, RI, NY, NJ, WI, MI, HI, IL, and certain cities and counties. According to a German consultant to the company, Tasers, as consumer products, are currently illegal in Europe.

If Taser weapons are not considered firearms, what are they considered? This presents yet another challenge to our hypocritical, gynocratic “legal” system. I don't know what Tasers are considered, but I can guess: in the name of protecting women -- translation: getting the female vote -- our male legislators and judges will ignore the issue until men force them to deal with it. This is the shocking truth, folks.

Here's a scenario to ponder: If a maniacal wife attacks her husband, as so often happens, and he tases her, what do you suppose would happen to him? Ha! How many lawyers would it take to defend him, to “prove his innocence”? Not to mention being pilloried by the media as a wimp (when a woman attacks a man, it is just emotion; let it go).

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

I counsel every man to ask a new paramour, before becoming sexually involved with her, about: her use of birth control, her willingness to terminate an accidental pregnancy, and her carriage of STDs. Now, there is a new question to add: Do you own a Taser? If she does, and logic and perspective don't appear to be her strongsuits, stay far, far away from her.

Remember Biden & Brownback: they have convinced their Senate and House colleagues to give women the preponderance of civil and criminal rights. They are responsible for creating the Department of Justice's unconstitutional Office on Violence Against Women. And, they will be responsible for women indiscriminately tasing men.
There are many things you might want to say during a romantic evening gone badly, but the last one is: “Don't tase me, babe!”


Source: here

51 comments:

Bob said...

Bob has previously observed that a man is not safe within 500 yards of a female. Now it's good to notice that 500 yards is out of range for her Taser.

Of course there are the blue gun thugs. A recent video shows a man being Tasered to death by the blue gun thugs at the Vancover airport.

Anonymous said...

A woman uses her Taser against her husband only in self-defense.

Tasers should be sold only to women, so that they can defend themselves against predators.

The tased man can then be easily thrown into jail by police and the wife can divorce and gets the house.

The man will hopefully pay alimony, as it is his duty and she deserves it. Remember: She sacrificed her career for him.

The use of a Taser should become a prove that the man has been violent.

Husbands are extremely violent: it starts when he is not working enough and tries to steal her money by restricting her purchases.

Men need to be tased!

Women will never ever use a taser without reason! How dare you think otherwise?!
Domestic violence is a great concern for many wives.

Nicole

Bob said...

A Taser in the back while he's asleep may be slightly better than a shotgun in the back as women do today. But its only better if 20 years of indentured servitude (slavery) after losing your family is prefereable to a quick death.

Anonymous said...

"I counsel every man to ask a new paramour, before becoming sexually involved with her, about: her use of birth control, her willingness to terminate an accidental pregnancy, and her carriage of STDs. Now, there is a new question to add: Do you own a Taser? If she does, and logic and perspective don't appear to be her strongsuits, stay far, far away from her."

This is GREAT advice, Masculist Man. Do you have a form that we could use to give our paramour before sexual relations that covers these things? If not, do you know of someone who does? Or could put one together?

You refered to men you counsel. Do you provide counseling or mentoring services to young guys? Have you ever thought of producing a dating guide? Have you written a book? I'd buy it and know a lot of guys who should.

eMasculist said...

"Have you ever thought of producing a dating guide? Have you written a book? I'd buy it and know a lot of guys who should."

Right on, bro. I'd buy it to. How much is it?

Masculist Man said...

A woman uses her Taser against her husband only in self-defense.


Somehow I'm not buying that as I've seen too many instances where that is not the case. Women have attacked their husbands or boyfriends with no provocation.

Tasers should be sold only to women, so that they can defend themselves against predators.

So men are on our own and don't count. That seems to be the feminist mindset. How can a man defend himself against an armed female assailant?

The tased man can then be easily thrown into jail by police and the wife can divorce and gets the house.

So basically all the wife has to do is tase the guy,make up a story that he attacked her,divorce him and take the house and it's all legally sanctioned thanks to feminists such as yourself.

The man will hopefully pay alimony, as it is his duty and she deserves it. Remember: She sacrificed her career for him.

Somehow I don't believe that her quitting her job at McDonald's as much of a "career sacrifice". Since she is getting money from him without anything in return what is he getting? Besides the shaft. Alimony is legalized slavery. Women who demand responsibilities from men are "asserting themselves" meanwhile men who demand responsibilities from women are called "sexist pigs". See the two standards?

Then there are the euphemisms that feminists have changed such as "policeperson" but left others alone such as "bad guy".

But back to Nicole's crap:

The use of a Taser should become a prove that the man has been violent.

Actually the use of a taser only proves the woman is violent.

Husbands are extremely violent: it starts when he is not working enough and tries to steal her money by restricting her purchases.


According to the objective evidence that I've read women commit domestic violence at the same rate or greater than men but if a man tased his violent wife I'm sure you would be with the rest of the feminsts screaming for his blood.

If she can't handle a credit card it would be in both of their interests to get it away from her before she plunges them into bankruptcy.

Men need to be tased!

That statement alone speaks about how you feel about men.

Women will never ever use a taser without reason! How dare you think otherwise?!
Domestic violence is a great concern for many wives.


A "reason" to women could be boredom or setting him up for a fat divorce settlement. Yes,I dare to think otherwise. As long as DV in its currently held belief of "man bad,woman good" a lot of unscrupleous women are going to use that to their advantage.

Masculist Man said...

Anonymous November 18, 2007 10:04 AM,

A book perhaps. I'll keep that in mind.

Anonymous said...

Off Topic: Why does Chris Key sorta take the side of elfprincess on his forum when ElfPrincess reported mikeusa to the FBI and threatens to ban mikeusa for making "threats" (which were not threats). Why isn't ElfPrincess banned for trying to bring harm to a man in real life (she wishes for mikeusa to be put in prison and be raped by homosexuals, as many women wish. Women like homosexual and want men to know the joys of them!)

Why does Chris Key say that the "MRM" needs to get rid of all mysoginy in "it".

Anonymous said...

Don't worry: Nicole was me, it wasn't meant seriously.
But: there are enough women who seriously believe such things.

Masculist Man said...

Anonymous November 19, 2007 3:55 AM,

I've asked myself the same thing.

Anonymous said...

Masc, why not ask Chris Key himself?

And you should check Emasculist blog, as she is mocking you.

Masculist Man said...

And you should check Emasculist blog, as she is mocking you.

I've seen it. It's just Steele's attempt to parody me and this site. I look at it as I'm being effective. If you are effective they jump on you. If not they ignore you. This tells me I being effective and that I've stepped on some feminist toes,which is a good thing.

Besides the material she's using on her blog is old and stale. She's hitting someone with the "gay" and/or "loser" label and that label is 30 years old. Nothing original here and it makes me yawn everytime I see it and I'm sure I'm not alone on that.

Anonymous said...

Check out what ChrisKey just said (your thoughts?):

http://www.mens-rights.net/forum/index.php/topic,2883.0.html
ChrisKey Said:
---------------------------------------
Quote from: mike_of_the_usa on Today at 12:32:49 AM
ChrisKey: She reported me to the FBI.
That is not a threat, it is worse, it is action.

Why don't you ban her? She is attempting to have me put in prison.
-----------------------------

Your incitement of terrorism gave her a logically-sound reason to report you to the FBI. I am not going to punish her for taking offence to your extremism.

If you don't like being reported to the FBI, then do not say or do anything that will give people a reason to report you to the FBI. It's a matter of taking responsibility for your actions. You need to accept that your extreminism can land you into a lot of trouble. You're not a victim of anything other than your refusal to accept that the fact that you cannot do as you please in today's society.

Anonymous said...

Very interesting Anonymous (above, I think it's Mikee). I read some stuff over at Chris Keys website and I think your being silenced by mras is unfair. Everyone should be able to talk openly, but why do mras want to be all nicey nicey? thats what manginas do. And what does masculist man make of all this??? is chris a mangina too?

Anonymous said...

Anon: Most MRAs are pro-women's rights. They're selling us the same bill of goods we've been sold in the past (gender equality). We need something new, like Men ruling and girls obeying.

Masculist Man said...

I've made my displeasure about EP becoming moderator at Men's Rights Net (Chris' board)known here.

Bob said...

I've been frequenting Chris Key's forum lately to check out this discussion. I find that Elfbitch isn't the only feminist moderator on the forum. I just disagreed with another mod who did a "blame the nearest available man" to excuse a vow breaking female. Feminism is so insideious in the Men's Movement its hard to eradicate. So many young men have learned feminist dogma with their mother's milk that they all live and breath it now.

Bob said...

Speaking of the Taser II, I just heard a radio commecial for it on a conservative talk radio station. The bitch voice suggested buying your wife one for an Xmas gift. And just kiss your ass goodbye no doubt.

Blessings

Bob

Bob said...

"Anon: Most MRAs are pro-women's rights. They're selling us the same bill of goods we've been sold in the past (gender equality). We need something new, like Men ruling and girls obeying."

Yes, most so-called MRAs are actually promoting and advocating classic feminism. They are the antithesis of Men's Rights Advocates. And what’s worse, they learned all that feminist dogma from mom at a very young age so they think it’s just normal morality. They are a pack of wolves in sheep's clothing.

Anonymous said...

Tazer stuff: Conservatives want to "conserve" our current society.

Robin Steele said...

If rapists don't care for Tasers, they're really not going to like the RAPEX
I am opposed to this barbaric device. Let's work together to get the word out about it before South Africans start selling them on ShEbay. Take my poll and send a message to legislators: No RAPEX in the U.A.!

Anonymous said...

Women only act in Self Defense? I wonder if Phil Hartmann's Orphaned Children agree with that. His Drug using Third Wife who he planned to leave for her Cocaine use and violence. Murdered him in his sleep and then killed herself.

Women are as every bit as capable of violence as Men. And do the majority of Child Abuse in this country. Which can no longer be hid, as they have Primary custody. Due to Family Court judges.

The Right to self Defense is a Natural Right. The Right or entitlement to abuse others and torture them is not.

Mary Winkler murdered her Husband. Two Women Attorneys including an ex Judge (Woman) agreed that she got away with Murder. She is also a Check Kiter and was involved in a Nigerian Bank Fraud scheme.

Anonymous said...

I absolutely think RAPEX should be sold here. It will finally do what Men have been unable to do. Take the Beer goggles off the Eyes of Men who enable Feminism. Men should finally tell American Women that our Social Contract is invalid. And refuse to have anything to do with the.

It is simply an indication that Feminists reserve the right to arbitrarily mutilate and torture Men. It will do more harm to Women. Men who are thus Mutilated Will Kill Women who abuse them this way.

Hate bounces. Feminists are too stupid to realize they are overplaying their hand. I say let them reap the harvest the full harvest of their hatred.

It is considered entertainment to torture Men now. Hostel, Hard Candy, Saw are all examples of Sex connected to torture and murder. This is now considered entertainment.

This will further erode the relations between Men and Women. Which are already severely damaged.
Women in their zeal to destroy the love and trust Men had for them are doing themselves further long term damage.

Anonymous said...

Masculist Man, the link you gave to Chris' website did not work. It says 'log in' yet I am using a college computer and do not want to risk signing in and then being expelled (feminists are very anti mens rights at my college).

Please could you copy and paste the interaction?

Also, don't believe Robin Steele, she is trying to worm her way into mra affections now by pretending to care about rapex. Please make sure she is never trusted Masculist Man, you are a hero to us little guys.

Robin Steele said...

Anonymous said I absolutely think RAPEX should be sold here... It is simply an indication that Feminists reserve the right to arbitrarily mutilate and torture Men.
I think that RAPEX is brutal and should be unnecessary in a civilized society. However, it's hardly arbitrary. Those who would suffer mutilation would be rapists. By saying it's arbitrary, you're implying that all men are rapists.

Anonymouse said ...Masculist Man, you are a hero to us little guys.
Masculist Man: Any particular reason you're an inspiration to the "little guys"? Maybe RAPEX wouldn't work on Masculist Man and the wee lad.

Anonymous said...

Robin, shut up. I am entering adulthood (almost 18) and I wish I had a role model like Masculist Man when I was growing up. Masculist Man is like a surrogate father figure to a lot of us younger guys who are in our teens or twenties, and I can relate to Luke respecting Masculist Man because I know I do.

Masculist Man should hold gatherings because he is a talented man and has lots of wisdom about feminist hate against men and can also tear you feminazis a new one and he does so time and time again in his blog posts. Go away Robin Steele, you are not welcome to trawl mra boards pretending to hate rapex, because we know you love it really.

Anonymous said...

Based on what I know of Chris Key and his site www.mens-rights.net, I believe he wanted ElfPrincess on his site in order to offset some of the more extreme posters by allowing someone who would typically be an outsider input into these posts. Based on what I've seen of her posts, I think this was a mistake but then that isn't my call to make. He DOES own the board and can do as he sees fit. At any rate, I am registered on his board. I base my posts on my own personal experiences and perceptions. I strive to avoid personal attacks but I WILL take exception to posts I have reason to object to. But not to the poster themselves. That simply chews up bandwidth to no good purpose.

Luke Skywalker said...

Masculist Man,

This is off topic, but important:

I think I sent you a message about Mancast before, but anyway, just in case you didn't get it, I'll tell you now:

It would inspire a lot of people if you were on Mancast, which is the MGTOW podcast. All you'd have to do is make a short speech and then that would be it.

Please think about it.

Masculist Man said...

Thanks for the kudos,anonymous November 20, 2007 7:42 PM

Masculist Man said...

I've been frequenting Chris Key's forum lately to check out this discussion. I find that Elfbitch isn't the only feminist moderator on the forum.

Who was that?

Masculist Man said...

And what does masculist man make of all this???

Right now I'm going to take a "wait and see" attitude about it.

Masculist Man said...

Please could you copy and paste the interaction?

Sure.

Chris Key's comments follow:

elfprincess's criticism of the board and the Men's Movement is invaluable, as it allows us to understand how we're perceived by onlookers who are unaware of feminism's corrupt history. Analysing her criticisms of the board is practical, as it gives us the ability to understand the effectiveness of our tactics. elfprincess's insight is beneficial to us, as the majority of her criticisms are substantiated. Only a few of her criticisms are devoid of reason.

I gave her the right to moderate some of the forums because of her understanding of logical fallacies and argumentation. Her objectivity on gender issues is as sound as I have seen from any one. There are times when she has made a couple of generalisations that are logically fallacious, but the majority of her arguments are logically sound and substantiated. Therefore, I believe she is the right person to moderate the "Forum Rules", "Good Female Behaviour" and "Bad Female Behaviour" sections of the board.


You're kidding,right? She comes off like a feminist. I've seen it,DCM has seen it,Luke Skywalker has seen it and Raider has seen it and we've all called her on it. She is trying to make herself right even though the facts dictate otherwise. Just because she sprinkles some nice things about men here and there doesn't erase the fact that she comes off sounding like a feminist most of the time. She's asked for evidence of her feminist attitude and how she contradicts herself from me and I've provided it. I'll agree with Bob on this one and that she should not be a moderator.

Bob said...

Chris Key's forum has become like K-Rights forum/group and the Men's News Daily forum. All of them have feminist female mods. Its bad enough dealing with quisling men all the time. But a feminist female mod really puts a damper on free speech among men.

I note that Ms. Elfcunt is not the only feminist advocate mod on Chris's forum. But the others seem to be men who have been taught feminist values as young lads. There is at least some chance that the feminist men can eventually unlearn the crap their mothers taught them. Not so with Ms. Elfcunt.

Blessings

Bob

Anonymous said...

Bob: The only way women's rights will be destroyed and men have liberty is through violence. Even the majority of men in the men's movement are infavor of women's rights so a mass movement to get rid of women's rights is impossible. When one is a minority violence or coercion is the only answer. How can it happen?

Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Political theory suggests that a successful revolution takes only 10% of the population actively supporting it. You also need 20% passively supporting and 20% who really don't care.

Female suffrage will lead to the eventual total collapse of western nations as higher and higher taxes are levied to pay for the benefits that females feel that they deserve. If left alone the US will go the way of the former Soviet Union.

It is a question whether or not men can recapture it before it collapses and comes apart.

Blessings

Bob

Anonymous said...

What's next is IMBRA 2. Where you will be charged with unlawfully going to a Nation where there are Non Feminized Women, for Sex. Men who travel outside the US are now being grilled as to their purpose. If you are a US Citizen whose business is it?

Already the Visa problems and fees are growing for US Men to marry Foreign Women and bring them into the US. The Feminists know that if the rejection of Women by US Men grows and continues their Movement will collapse. As there are not enough Lesbians to keep their movement going.

Feminist Radicals are promoting "Intergenerational Sex", pedophilia with Minor Girls. Saying that Girls as young as 8 can consent to have Sex with Women. If they "choose" to have Sex with Women. The same Feminists who accuse Men of being Rapists who are attracted to younger Women.

The Feminist Double Standard at work. Feminists did not object to the Fulsom Street Fair. And to the S&M Culture and Deviant Sexual practices promoted there.

Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
I don't think that an open centrally controlled revolution would work. I suspect that there will be an increase in the number of individual men fighting back. There will be more prosecutors, judges, lieyers, legislators, pigs, college hate professors, and feminist leaders who quietly disappear or are just killed by persons unknown. There will concurrently be more public counter attacks such as the "DC Sniper," the Virginia Tech assasin, etc. The media will pander to the feminist / gun thug mentality of course, until the very end.

When the econcomic colapse comes men should be ready.

Bob said...

Masculist Man quoted Bob, "I've been frequenting Chris Key's forum lately to check out this discussion. I find that Elfbitch isn't the only feminist moderator on the forum."

Masculist Man asked, "Who was that?"

Bob replies: The TV show "Hateline" has become widely known for entrapping normal men by pretending to be teenage marriageable age women, and then luring the man into an arranged meeting with the blue gun thug who posed as a young breeding age female -- all done with spewing hate about how evil men are for meeting young females on-line.

A feminist character who calls himself “raider67” on Chris Key’s forum recently quoted Hateling on some topic. When I asked him why he watches and quotes a program that so often attacks men he responded with the following:

raider67
"I watch Dateline because it is a very fair and balanced news program without any left-wing bent whatsoever and all the informative stories they run about men being good and feminism being bad. I also watch Katie Couric religiously as I find her to be a strong and empowered woman who cares about how we feel. I Tivo Oprah and I'm voting for Hillary Clinton because we need a woman in the whitehouse to promote equality."


It is obvious to Bob that “raider67” is a card carrying feminist who spends his time promoting feminist issues and dogma on Chris Key‘s forum.

Blessings

Bob

Anonymous said...

bob said: "Female suffrage will lead to the eventual total collapse of western nations as higher and higher taxes are levied to pay for the benefits that females feel that they deserve. If left alone the US will go the way of the former Soviet Union." and "When the econcomic colapse comes men should be ready."

Is this the best plan we can come up with? Be ready when everything collapses? And just hope we find each other in the smoldering rubble? Or after we're taken over by some waiting nation?

I am a bit disappointed. I have been reading your and Masculist Man's blogs thinking that I was witnessing the emergence of leadership. I mean this with no disrespect, but if this is the best solution we've got then I guess all these grand ideas amount to nothing but hot air. How depressing.

Bob said...

Note to anonymous: The FBI and other agencies monitors all Internet trafic. Bob is not going to advocate any revolution, insurrection, or any other criminal acts on the Internet. Any Men's Advocate who does so will quickly be taken down by the blue gun thugs. The FBI has a hisotry of illegal assaults on religioius groups and activist groups.

The power and real threat of the Men's Movement is that there is no particular leader they can point to and destroy. It is a political force and an active force but there isn't a chain of command or even correspondence between men who take decisive individual action and Men's Advocates.

Men need to use models such as the Rainbow Family who held annual gatherings in the National Forest in the face of decades of government attempts to find and arrest leadership. There succeeded by not haveing any organizaiton or identifiable leadership. The Men's Movement is like that. We have no official leaders. We are growing in numbers, political clout, and independent action.

Blessings
Bob

Anonymous said...

Bob said: "Men need to use models such as the Rainbow Family who held annual gatherings in the National Forest in the face of decades of government attempts to find and arrest leadership. There succeeded by not haveing any organizaiton or identifiable leadership. The Men's Movement is like that. We have no official leaders. We are growing in numbers, political clout, and independent action."

The Men's Movement is like a bunch of stoned out hippy deadheads with zero political clout whatsoever.

Tell me you are freaking kidding.

Anonymous said...

The lack of political clout seems true. Peace accomplishes nothing.

Anonymous said...

If you support Hillary Clinton for President, you are NOT an MRA.

If you believe that tasers are being given to women as a rape prevention measure and not as a tool of husband murder, you are NOT an MRA.

If you think that Saudi Arabia should be bombed for having a female rape victim whipped, you are NOT an MRA.

If you automatically believe ANY woman who claims to have been abused then you are definitely NOT an MRA.

Anonymous said...

A Canadian Man recently Tazed and sprayed with Pepper Spray has died. This is not an accident but an escalation in the War on Men and Boys. It will have a reverse effect. Men who in the past would protect Women will angrily and violently turn on them and kill them. It seems Women have lost their survival instincts. As decent Men continue to withdraw from US Skank Women.

Bob said...

The latest Dem polling in Iowa shows that Ms. Hitllary is neck and neck with a couple of men. It seems that since her little feminist speech about "the Men's club" a lot of Dems have pegged her as a men hating feminist. Half of the Dem's wouldn't vote for her under any circumstances either.

Masculist Man said...

I thought the dems loved man-haters.

Robin Steele said...

I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wring. I just read about the size and power of the Men's rights Rally in CA and admit I stand corrected. Not that size matters.

MRM Displays Power, Professionalism at Rally!

Bob said...

Robin Steele said..."I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wring."

Isn't this the babe who whines about men's spelling?

Anonymous said...

Tammy Bruce former President of the Los Angeles Chapter of NOW. Stated that the Protectors of Women and Children in the Middle East is not Feminists. NOW has done nothing to protect them. Who is?

Their symbol is an Anchor, Globe and Eagle. Yes the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS. Those Ueber Masculine, butt kicking, no BS hyper masculine Men.

There is no virtues without courage. The Roman Senator Cicero made that statement Millenia ago. He declared "Courage is the first virtue it enables all others."

A Man in Scotland protecting his wife from the Abuses of the Occupying English. William Wallace led a rebellion that freed Scotland from English Occupation. Even though he did not live to see it.

Men are hard wired to support Order, Reason, Truth, justice. We are not emotive creatures swayed by our feelings of the moment. And while we are imperfect We have been the protectors of Women and Children for as long as our species has been on this planet.

In the last 40 years. An Elitist movement of privledged White Women has sought to dismantle the Family, destroy the Trust between genders and to remake society. What is the outcome?

Marriage is dying, birth rates are plummeting. Our Prisons are full of the product of Single Mother homes.
Our children are being abused and even murdered in record numbers. Because their protectors their Biological Fathers by the millions have been removed from their homes.

The Legacy of Feminism is a massive Social Failure. Whose primary product is the elimination of Human Freedom and increasing dependence on Nanny Government. Men hate dependency and crave freedom.

My hope is before it is too late. Women will wake up reject this insane Lie, and stand next to us. We complement each other. And have been partners through this Vale of Tears we call life. Women have alot to do to make up for the damage they have caused.

Khankrumthebulgar

Anonymous said...

Women have never stood by Men when not forced to.

Bob said...

"Tammy Bruce former President of the Los Angeles Chapter of NOW. Stated that the Protectors of Women and Children in the Middle East is not Feminists. NOW has done nothing to protect them. Who is?"

If there was ever a good use for a Bushmaster.....